Tuesday, October 25, 2016

Sewage with My Salad?

The fruits and vegetables you feed your family may have been grown in re-purposed sewage filled with pharmaceuticals, heavy metals, and other contaminants. Action Alert!

Hundreds of thousands of tons of sewage sludge are spread each year on America’s forests and agricultural lands. This is commonly done with great secrecy. If you want to know where it has been dumped, in at least one state, you have to drive to the state capitol and ask for files. You can only view the files; they can’t be photocopied. Somebody is working very hard to prevent the public from knowing which farms or forests contain this sludge.

Sewage sludge is just what it sounds like—municipal sewage that has been processed to obtain “clean” water, leaving behind a concentrated sludge full of contaminants. This used to be dumped into the ocean until the practice was banned in 1988 because it was too toxic.

As we’ve reported before, sewage sludge—euphemistically referred to as “biosolids” after it is treated with lime—is often riddled with pharmaceutical drugs and personal care products containing endocrine disruptors that interfere with hormones such as thyroid, estrogen, and testosterone. Contaminants can persist in the soil for decades if not longer.

The sheer volume of contaminants presents researchers with significant challenges. High concentrations of brominated flame retardants are found in sludge, including 209 polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs). Each has its own toxicology, and the toxicity of combinations hasn’t even been considered. Research shows that PBDEs cause thyroid hormone disruption, delayed puberty, learning impairments, and behavioral changes, and other toxicities in animals.

Sewage sludge also contains polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). PCBs were banned in 1979 because of their extreme toxicity to humans and the environment. Among other things, they cause cancer and birth defects. There are also 209 versions of these chemicals, each with its own toxicity.

And the list goes on. Pharmaceutical drugs, including birth control pills and heart medications, heavy metals, pesticides, and every kind of industrial toxin you can think of is concentrated in sewage sludge.

As is too often the case, regulators are covering up the dangers. One of the leading experts in the field, David Lewis, was run out of the agency after revealing the true toxicity of sewage sludge in scientific publications. Among other things, he showed that it caused the death of hundreds of dairy cows in Georgia. Dr. Lewis transferred to the University of Georgia, where the EPA continued its assault on his integrity. In an effort to prove Lewis wrong about the cattle deaths, the university, with the help of the EPA, eventually published monitoring data that was found by a federal judge to be fabricated.

Action Alert! Write to your governors and state legislators. Tell them to stop allowing the use of repurposed sewage on our soil. Demand more transparency about what sewage is being dumped where, and tell them we need more studies on the long-term affects of current sewage use practices. Please send your message immediately.

Take-Action

 

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2eCngVZ via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2erGoDL

Good and Bad News in the War on Compounded Natural Medicine

The FDA listens to ANH mebers and other critics in final rule.

The agency, in its final rule governing the removal of medicines from a list of permitted compounded drugs, has agreed to notify interested parties in advance, as required by law. This is a victory, in that the agency’s original proposal from 2014 was to drop public notification, despite notification being required by the government’s standard rulemaking procedure.

The aim of the 2014 proposal was clearly to drop public input, and at least for now, your efforts and those of our allies have helped to stop this. Whether the FDA will try again is uncertain. It says that its decision is made “at this time,” which clearly signals that it may only be a temporary retreat.

Temporary or not, it is good news, and it is in addition to the other good news we have already reported on—that the agency is defining “transdermal and topical delivery systems,” which are likely to be banned from compounding, to exclude creams and gels, but instead to include patches only.

As we pointed out, creams are absolutely essential to the proper delivery of many natural hormones among other drugs, so we will be watching this very closely. With luck, the FDA will not go after creams in the future. This is, however, far from certain.

Big Pharma is moving into the bioidentical hormone area. Although it does not like selling creams, it likes selling patches. This is not necessarily in the best interest of consumers, because patches contain penetrating agents that pose their own risks. But if Big Pharma has control of bioidentical hormone tablets and patches, it then might move against creams through the FDA. In our efforts to protect creams, we have had the help of many allies, and we would especially like to thank our friends at the International Association of Compounding Pharmacists for their hard work on these issues.

Using arcane or overly broad language, or burying important information in long, complex documents—all of these are familiar FDA tactics. Remember, this is how the agency tried to impose a backdoor ban on natural folate. For that reason, we and our allies have to maintain constant vigilance.

There is some bad news, too: adenosine monophosphate (AMP), -diphosphate, and -triphosphate have been banned from compounding.

AMP is currently available in supplement form, but unfortunately the most robust benefits (see below) of this substance have been demonstrated when it is injected intramuscularly. As far as we can tell, injectable AMP was only available through compounding pharmacies, meaning that doctors and patients will no longer be able to use this natural remedy.

AMP is used by integrative doctors for a number of purposes. It has been shown to be an effective treatment for multiple sclerosis and herpes labialis (cold sores). Testimonials also indicate its potential effectiveness in the treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome and muscle fatigue. One patient told us:

I have been using AMP [under the care of a natural physician because I] suffer from chronic fatigue and muscle fatigue when carrying out simple tasks like hanging out the wash, brushing my teeth and making the bed.…[AMP] provides significant relief from muscle fatigue. It doesn’t take away all fatigue but it helps me to function and do tasks that I would struggle with otherwise.

We believe the FDA is trying to restrict compounding pharmacies to protect their allies in Big Pharma, and the attack on compounded versions of drugs has only started. Congress does not understand these kinds of technical issues, so the involvement of the public is crucial.

Other articles in this week’s Pulse of Natural Health:

Sewage with My Salad?

CDC Corruption: Scientists on the Inside Slam the Agency

 

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2e7z39o via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2erDRcF

CDC Corruption: Scientists on the Inside Slam the Agency

More evidence of extensive crony ties. Action Alert!

Recently we’ve reported on the crony ties between top US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) officials and beverage giant Coca-Cola. New evidence suggests that the cronyism at the CDC goes far deeper.

A group calling itself CDC Scientists Preserving Integrity, Diligence, and Ethics in Research (CDC SPIDER) recently submitted a letter to the CDC chief of staff expressing grave concerns about special interest influence being exerted on the agency’s leaders.

It’s worth quoting the beginning of the letter:

We are a group of scientists at CDC that are very concerned about the current state of ethics at our agency. It appears that our mission is being influenced and shaped by outside parties and rogue interests. It seems that our mission and Congressional intent for our agency is being circumvented by some of our leaders. What concerns us most is that it is becoming the norm and not the rare exception. Some senior management officials at CDC are clearly aware and even condone these behaviors. Others see it and turn the other way. Some staff are intimidated and pressed to do things they know are not right [emphasis added].

The scientists then provide examples of this behavior, including the recently exposed ties to Coca-Cola.

It’s worth considering what other CDC issues are poisoned by these “outside parties and rogue interests.” Are vaccine manufacturers influencing CDC leaders concerning childhood vaccinations, as we’ve long believed? Are potential whistleblowers being threatened and silenced to protect industry interests? How can we put our children’s health in the hands of an agency that has this level of corruption being reported by its own scientist employees?

Action Alert! Write to your legislators in Congress and urge them to launch an investigation of the CDC to see how far this corruption goes. Please send your message immediately.

Take-Action

Other articles in this week’s Pulse of Natural Health:

Sewage with My Salad?

Good and Bad News in the War on Compounded Natural Medicine

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2e7xf0g via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2erGnzU

Sewage with My Salad?

The fruits and vegetables you feed your family may have been grown in re-purposed sewage filled with pharmaceuticals, heavy metals, and other contaminants. Action Alert!

Hundreds of thousands of tons of sewage sludge are spread each year on America’s forests and agricultural lands. This is commonly done with great secrecy. If you want to know where it has been dumped, in at least one state, you have to drive to the state capitol and ask for files. You can only view the files; they can’t be photocopied. Somebody is working very hard to prevent the public from knowing which farms or forests contain this sludge.

Sewage sludge is just what it sounds like—municipal sewage that has been processed to obtain “clean” water, leaving behind a concentrated sludge full of contaminants. This used to be dumped into the ocean until the practice was banned in 1988 because it was too toxic.

As we’ve reported before, sewage sludge—euphemistically referred to as “biosolids” after it is treated with lime—is often riddled with pharmaceutical drugs and personal care products containing endocrine disruptors that interfere with hormones such as thyroid, estrogen, and testosterone. Contaminants can persist in the soil for decades if not longer.

The sheer volume of contaminants presents researchers with significant challenges. High concentrations of brominated flame retardants are found in sludge, including 209 polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs). Each has its own toxicology, and the toxicity of combinations hasn’t even been considered. Research shows that PBDEs cause thyroid hormone disruption, delayed puberty, learning impairments, and behavioral changes, and other toxicities in animals.

Sewage sludge also contains polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). PCBs were banned in 1979 because of their extreme toxicity to humans and the environment. Among other things, they cause cancer and birth defects. There are also 209 versions of these chemicals, each with its own toxicity.

And the list goes on. Pharmaceutical drugs, including birth control pills and heart medications, heavy metals, pesticides, and every kind of industrial toxin you can think of is concentrated in sewage sludge.

As is too often the case, regulators are covering up the dangers. One of the leading experts in the field, David Lewis, was run out of the agency after revealing the true toxicity of sewage sludge in scientific publications. Among other things, he showed that it caused the death of hundreds of dairy cows in Georgia. Dr. Lewis transferred to the University of Georgia, where the EPA continued its assault on his integrity. In an effort to prove Lewis wrong about the cattle deaths, the university, with the help of the EPA, eventually published monitoring data that was found by a federal judge to be fabricated.

Action Alert! Write to your governors and state legislators. Tell them to stop allowing the use of repurposed sewage on our soil. Demand more transparency about what sewage is being dumped where, and tell them we need more studies on the long-term affects of current sewage use practices. Please send your message immediately.

Take-Action

 



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2eCngVZ via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2erEsem

Good and Bad News in the War on Compounded Natural Medicine

The FDA listens to ANH mebers and other critics in final rule.

The agency, in its final rule governing the removal of medicines from a list of permitted compounded drugs, has agreed to notify interested parties in advance, as required by law. This is a victory, in that the agency’s original proposal from 2014 was to drop public notification, despite notification being required by the government’s standard rulemaking procedure.

The aim of the 2014 proposal was clearly to drop public input, and at least for now, your efforts and those of our allies have helped to stop this. Whether the FDA will try again is uncertain. It says that its decision is made “at this time,” which clearly signals that it may only be a temporary retreat.

Temporary or not, it is good news, and it is in addition to the other good news we have already reported on—that the agency is defining “transdermal and topical delivery systems,” which are likely to be banned from compounding, to exclude creams and gels, but instead to include patches only.

As we pointed out, creams are absolutely essential to the proper delivery of many natural hormones among other drugs, so we will be watching this very closely. With luck, the FDA will not go after creams in the future. This is, however, far from certain.

Big Pharma is moving into the bioidentical hormone area. Although it does not like selling creams, it likes selling patches. This is not necessarily in the best interest of consumers, because patches contain penetrating agents that pose their own risks. But if Big Pharma has control of bioidentical hormone tablets and patches, it then might move against creams through the FDA. In our efforts to protect creams, we have had the help of many allies, and we would especially like to thank our friends at the International Association of Compounding Pharmacists for their hard work on these issues.

Using arcane or overly broad language, or burying important information in long, complex documents—all of these are familiar FDA tactics. Remember, this is how the agency tried to impose a backdoor ban on natural folate. For that reason, we and our allies have to maintain constant vigilance.

There is some bad news, too: adenosine monophosphate (AMP), -diphosphate, and -triphosphate have been banned from compounding.

AMP is currently available in supplement form, but unfortunately the most robust benefits (see below) of this substance have been demonstrated when it is injected intramuscularly. As far as we can tell, injectable AMP was only available through compounding pharmacies, meaning that doctors and patients will no longer be able to use this natural remedy.

AMP is used by integrative doctors for a number of purposes. It has been shown to be an effective treatment for multiple sclerosis and herpes labialis (cold sores). Testimonials also indicate its potential effectiveness in the treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome and muscle fatigue. One patient told us:

I have been using AMP [under the care of a natural physician because I] suffer from chronic fatigue and muscle fatigue when carrying out simple tasks like hanging out the wash, brushing my teeth and making the bed.…[AMP] provides significant relief from muscle fatigue. It doesn’t take away all fatigue but it helps me to function and do tasks that I would struggle with otherwise.

We believe the FDA is trying to restrict compounding pharmacies to protect their allies in Big Pharma, and the attack on compounded versions of drugs has only started. Congress does not understand these kinds of technical issues, so the involvement of the public is crucial.

Other articles in this week’s Pulse of Natural Health:

Sewage with My Salad?

CDC Corruption: Scientists on the Inside Slam the Agency

 



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2e7z39o via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2eOGfs8

Action Alert: Investigate the CDC!

Related article: CDC Corruption: Scientists on the Inside Slam the Agency

Trouble Taking Action? Click here.

.errordiv { padding:10px; margin:10px; border: 1px solid #555555;color: #000000;background-color: #f8f8f8; text-align:center; width:500px; }
var ai_iframe_width_iframe3054 = 0; var ai_iframe_height_iframe3054 = 0;var aiIsIe8=false;var aiReadyCallbacks = ( typeof aiReadyCallbacks != ‘undefined’ && aiReadyCallbacks instanceof Array ) ? aiReadyCallbacks : [];var onloadFirediframe3054 = false; function aiShowIframe() { jQuery(“#iframe3054”).css(“visibility”, “visible”);} function aiShowIframeId(id_iframe) { jQuery(id_iframe).css(“visibility”, “visible”);} function aiResizeIframeHeight(height) { aiResizeIframeHeight(height,iframe3054); } function aiResizeIframeHeightId(height,width,id) {aiResizeIframeHeightById(id,height);} http://ift.tt/2erxiXIvar ifrm_iframe3054 = document.getElementById(“iframe3054”);
var hiddenTabsDoneiframe3054 = false;
function resizeCallbackiframe3054() {}

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2eOv5DU via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2dG4hDt

Action Alert: No Sewage In My Dinner!

Related article:  Sewage with My Salad?

Trouble Taking Action? Click here.

.errordiv { padding:10px; margin:10px; border: 1px solid #555555;color: #000000;background-color: #f8f8f8; text-align:center; width:500px; }
var ai_iframe_width_iframe3051 = 0; var ai_iframe_height_iframe3051 = 0;var aiIsIe8=false;var aiReadyCallbacks = ( typeof aiReadyCallbacks != ‘undefined’ && aiReadyCallbacks instanceof Array ) ? aiReadyCallbacks : [];var onloadFirediframe3051 = false; function aiShowIframe() { jQuery(“#iframe3051”).css(“visibility”, “visible”);} function aiShowIframeId(id_iframe) { jQuery(id_iframe).css(“visibility”, “visible”);} function aiResizeIframeHeight(height) { aiResizeIframeHeight(height,iframe3051); } function aiResizeIframeHeightId(height,width,id) {aiResizeIframeHeightById(id,height);} http://ift.tt/2ervGxcvar ifrm_iframe3051 = document.getElementById(“iframe3051”);
var hiddenTabsDoneiframe3051 = false;
function resizeCallbackiframe3051() {}

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2eOxYVh via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2dG2v5p

Is There Sewage In My Salad?


Take Action
Read Full Story

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2eOuPVt via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2dG3uCP

CDC Corruption: Scientists on the Inside Slam the Agency

More evidence of extensive crony ties. Action Alert!

Recently we’ve reported on the crony ties between top US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) officials and beverage giant Coca-Cola. New evidence suggests that the cronyism at the CDC goes far deeper.

A group calling itself CDC Scientists Preserving Integrity, Diligence, and Ethics in Research (CDC SPIDER) recently submitted a letter to the CDC chief of staff expressing grave concerns about special interest influence being exerted on the agency’s leaders.

It’s worth quoting the beginning of the letter:

We are a group of scientists at CDC that are very concerned about the current state of ethics at our agency. It appears that our mission is being influenced and shaped by outside parties and rogue interests. It seems that our mission and Congressional intent for our agency is being circumvented by some of our leaders. What concerns us most is that it is becoming the norm and not the rare exception. Some senior management officials at CDC are clearly aware and even condone these behaviors. Others see it and turn the other way. Some staff are intimidated and pressed to do things they know are not right [emphasis added].

The scientists then provide examples of this behavior, including the recently exposed ties to Coca-Cola.

It’s worth considering what other CDC issues are poisoned by these “outside parties and rogue interests.” Are vaccine manufacturers influencing CDC leaders concerning childhood vaccinations, as we’ve long believed? Are potential whistleblowers being threatened and silenced to protect industry interests? How can we put our children’s health in the hands of an agency that has this level of corruption being reported by its own scientist employees?

Action Alert! Write to your legislators in Congress and urge them to launch an investigation of the CDC to see how far this corruption goes. Please send your message immediately.

Take-Action

Other articles in this week’s Pulse of Natural Health:

Sewage with My Salad?

Good and Bad News in the War on Compounded Natural Medicine



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2e7xf0g via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2ekwXVq

Action Alert: Investigate the CDC!

Related article: CDC Corruption: Scientists on the Inside Slam the Agency

Trouble Taking Action? Click here.



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2eOv5DU via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2eIe3I6

Action Alert: No Sewage In My Dinner!

Related article:  Sewage with My Salad?

Trouble Taking Action? Click here.



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2eOxYVh via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2dFBBPT

Is There Sewage In My Salad?


Take Action
Read Full Story



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2eOuPVt via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2erf0Ip

Tuesday, October 18, 2016

Natural Hormones on the Chopping Block Yet Again

It doesn’t look good. This time the FDA isn’t going after them directly—it’s going after the healthy way to deliver them. Unless there is massive consumer pushback, the FDA is likely to succeed because so few people understand what is involved. Extremely urgent Action Alert!

The FDA’s Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee (PCAC) has announced its next meeting, where it will make recommendations on whether creams can be used in compounding, and whether any of five specific substances will be allowed. The likelihood of their recommendation not being followed is remote.

Both transdermal and topical delivery systems have been nominated to the Demonstrably Difficult to Compound list, and are thus in extreme jeopardy. A decision against them will have dire consequences.

Unfortunately, very few people understand this. It is unlikely that even the members of the committee understand it. But Big Pharma and their allies at the FDA understand the situation fully—and are pulling the strings.

Natural hormone experts like Jonathan V. Wright, MD, have warned for years that many hormones should not be taken by mouth, either because the liver will “tag” them for elimination from the body before they can do their job or will abnormally alter them (in men, oral DHEA often is metabolized into unusually large levels of the hormone estrone); or because it is not healthy to take them this way—for example, in women, oral estrogens raise risk of blood clots and stroke.

The FDA listens only to big drug companies, which do not want the trouble of selling hormones in cream form—so the agency will refuse to offer them except as tablets. If compounded topical versions are no longer available, it means that many natural hormones will only be available in the ineffectual (or risky!) tablet form.

This would remove your ability to choose not only compounded bioidentical hormones, but also pain medications, and more. Many, many other medicines are delivered through topical creams or transdermal patches.

If the FDA decides to ban these delivery systems in pharmacies, many thousands of patients will be left in the lurch. Not only that, the FDA will severely cripple the entire compounding industry, as pain medicines and hormone replacement therapies are the largest component of many pharmacies’ business. The FDA knows this very well, which supports our contention that the elimination of the compounding industry has been the agency’s goal from day one.

As vitally important as the creams are, some of the other substances on the chopping block are important too. The five substances being reviewed are diindolylmethane (DIM), trichloroacetic acid, kojic acid, glycolic acid, and vasoactive intestinal peptide.

DIM is especially important. It is a naturally occurring compound found in Brassica vegetables like Brussels sprouts, cabbage, mustard greens, and kale, and has anti-cancer and immune-modulating properties. DIM can prevent hormone-related cancers, including breast and prostate cancer. It works, in part, by altering ratios of “good” and “bad” estrogen—reversing the effect, for example, of dihydrotestosterone, which is associated with prostate cancer.

It is critical that consumers maintain access to customized DIM medications. We can get DIM from cruciferous vegetables, but eating the amount of these vegetables required to get therapeutic levels of DIM day in and day out can be daunting. Moreover, an excessive consumption of cruciferous vegetables can negatively affect thyroid function.

Also on the chopping block is glycolic acid, derived from sugar cane, which is a natural exfoliator that helps with dry and wrinkled skin and acne.

If there isn’t a HUGE consumer backlash calling for the preservation of these substances, we can just say goodbye to them. In the past, the PCAC has voted to ban almost every substance that comes across their desk, no matter how safe it is. So far, PCAC has voted to remove curcumin, as well as boswellia, aloe vera, acetyl-L-carnitine, d-ribose, and more. Transcripts from previous meetings show that the committee almost always defers to whatever the FDA says, and then the FDA uses the committee for cover.

This makes sense when we consider that the committee has been a stacked deck from the beginning. Out of fourteen committee members, only one seems to be an expert on compounding specifically, rather than pharmacology in general, and that committee member can’t even vote! The other non-voting member is from a drug company with a clear conflict of interest, and one (voting) member is from an advocacy group with a clear bias against the compounding industry. The committee has clearly been chosen to destroy compounded medicines that millions of people rely on.

EXTREMELY URGENT Action Alert! Write to the FDA’s Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee. Tell them to maintain consumer access to transdermal and other safe natural medicines at traditional compounding pharmacies! Please send your message immediately.

Take-Action

Other articles in this week’s Pulse of Natural Health:

GMO: The Truth about the Science

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2dxYDXw via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2dl9A04

Natural Hormones on the Chopping Block Yet Again

It doesn’t look good. This time the FDA isn’t going after them directly—it’s going after the healthy way to deliver them. Unless there is massive consumer pushback, the FDA is likely to succeed because so few people understand what is involved. Extremely urgent Action Alert!

The FDA’s Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee (PCAC) has announced its next meeting, where it will make recommendations on whether creams can be used in compounding, and whether any of five specific substances will be allowed. The likelihood of their recommendation not being followed is remote.

Both transdermal and topical delivery systems have been nominated to the Demonstrably Difficult to Compound list, and are thus in extreme jeopardy. A decision against them will have dire consequences.

Unfortunately, very few people understand this. It is unlikely that even the members of the committee understand it. But Big Pharma and their allies at the FDA understand the situation fully—and are pulling the strings.

Natural hormone experts like Jonathan V. Wright, MD, have warned for years that many hormones should not be taken by mouth, either because the liver will “tag” them for elimination from the body before they can do their job or will abnormally alter them (in men, oral DHEA often is metabolized into unusually large levels of the hormone estrone); or because it is not healthy to take them this way—for example, in women, oral estrogens raise risk of blood clots and stroke.

The FDA listens only to big drug companies, which do not want the trouble of selling hormones in cream form—so the agency will refuse to offer them except as tablets. If compounded topical versions are no longer available, it means that many natural hormones will only be available in the ineffectual (or risky!) tablet form.

This would remove your ability to choose not only compounded bioidentical hormones, but also pain medications, and more. Many, many other medicines are delivered through topical creams or transdermal patches.

If the FDA decides to ban these delivery systems in pharmacies, many thousands of patients will be left in the lurch. Not only that, the FDA will severely cripple the entire compounding industry, as pain medicines and hormone replacement therapies are the largest component of many pharmacies’ business. The FDA knows this very well, which supports our contention that the elimination of the compounding industry has been the agency’s goal from day one.

As vitally important as the creams are, some of the other substances on the chopping block are important too. The five substances being reviewed are diindolylmethane (DIM), trichloroacetic acid, kojic acid, glycolic acid, and vasoactive intestinal peptide.

DIM is especially important. It is a naturally occurring compound found in Brassica vegetables like Brussels sprouts, cabbage, mustard greens, and kale, and has anti-cancer and immune-modulating properties. DIM can prevent hormone-related cancers, including breast and prostate cancer. It works, in part, by altering ratios of “good” and “bad” estrogen—reversing the effect, for example, of dihydrotestosterone, which is associated with prostate cancer.

It is critical that consumers maintain access to customized DIM medications. We can get DIM from cruciferous vegetables, but eating the amount of these vegetables required to get therapeutic levels of DIM day in and day out can be daunting. Moreover, an excessive consumption of cruciferous vegetables can negatively affect thyroid function.

Also on the chopping block is glycolic acid, derived from sugar cane, which is a natural exfoliator that helps with dry and wrinkled skin and acne.

If there isn’t a HUGE consumer backlash calling for the preservation of these substances, we can just say goodbye to them. In the past, the PCAC has voted to ban almost every substance that comes across their desk, no matter how safe it is. So far, PCAC has voted to remove curcumin, as well as boswellia, aloe vera, acetyl-L-carnitine, d-ribose, and more. Transcripts from previous meetings show that the committee almost always defers to whatever the FDA says, and then the FDA uses the committee for cover.

This makes sense when we consider that the committee has been a stacked deck from the beginning. Out of fourteen committee members, only one seems to be an expert on compounding specifically, rather than pharmacology in general, and that committee member can’t even vote! The other non-voting member is from a drug company with a clear conflict of interest, and one (voting) member is from an advocacy group with a clear bias against the compounding industry. The committee has clearly been chosen to destroy compounded medicines that millions of people rely on.

EXTREMELY URGENT Action Alert! Write to the FDA’s Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee. Tell them to maintain consumer access to transdermal and other safe natural medicines at traditional compounding pharmacies! Please send your message immediately.

Take-Action

Other articles in this week’s Pulse of Natural Health:

GMO: The Truth about the Science



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2dxYDXw via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2dYUzyS

GMO: The Truth about the Science

The truth can be very hard to get. So we’ve updated our own GMO Fact Check site. And we need to stop a new effort to use taxpayer money to spread industry propaganda. Action Alert!

Earlier this month, major biotech and agriculture groups sent a letter to key members of the House and Senate Appropriations Committee supporting the inclusion of $3 million in the fiscal year 2017 budget to “better inform the public about the application of biotechnology to food and agricultural production.” In plain English, these groups are asking for taxpayer dollars to fund propaganda efforts on behalf of the biotech industry.

This isn’t the first time this issue has come up. Back in May of this year, the same line item was being considered for inclusion in the FY 2017 budget. As the year draws to a close, the biotech industry and its front groups are ramping up efforts to get the government’s help in fixing the tarnished reputation of GMOs among the public. And we can be sure that $3 million is just the opening wedge. The total amount of taxpayer money being spent today to serve these special interests is already in the billions. And this new line item will continue to grow.

This move on Congress coincides with the recent appearance of a so-called “GMO Answers” website, which purports to provide answers to common misconceptions about GMOs. This decidedly unscientific “take” on the public’s concerns is a fabrication from something called the Council for Biotechnology Information (CBI), a front group for the biggest names in chemicals and biotech: Monsanto, Syngenta, Dow, DuPont, and Bayer.

We’ll leave it to the reader’s imagination to consider the kinds of “answers” their site provides.

For those interested in real answers to questions about GMOs, we’ve recently updated and revamped our GMO Fact Check site. We’ve included the most up-to-date information on the safety of GMOs, the facts about GMOs and pesticide use, the epidemic of cross-pollination of GMOs with conventional (and/or organic) crops, the myth that GMOs increase crop yields, and much more. Our information is science-based and fully cited. Since industry has systematically attempted to corrupt so many government agencies, universities, and researchers working in this field, simply having accurate, scientific data is an accomplishment.

It’s clear that our government, which is supposed to safeguard our health, is working hand in hand with industry to undermine it in exchange for campaign contributions and other support. Say no to spending an additional $3 million of taxpayers’ money for GMO propaganda!

Action Alert! Write to the House and Senate appropriations committees and urge them NOT to spend taxpayer dollars on biotech propaganda. Please send your message immediately.

Take-Action

Other articles in this week’s Pulse of Natural Health:

Natural Hormones on the Chopping Block Yet Again

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2epGWXy via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2erk1MJ

Golden Rice Is a Sham GMO Invention

“Golden rice” is a genetically modified rice product with murky beginnings. Calgene (the company that created Flavr-Savr tomatoes genetically modified with fish genes) held the first patent. It, and its inventor, Christine K. Shewmaker, apparently transferred to Monsanto when the company bought Calgene. Later on, the patent turned up at Syngenta under the names of two genetic engineers out of Switzerland and Germany, one of whom helped to do plant modification experiments that led to Roundup Ready crops.

The product has since been the basis of a massive campaign to promote it as a humanitarian venture of the Rockefeller Foundation-backed International Rice Research Institute—the organization that launched the “Green Revolution” in the 1960s. Syngenta and the Gates Foundation are both behind it. But how “humanitarian” is this venture, if its claims are false?

What Golden Rice Really Is

Golden rice is a GE version of white rice. White rice is a refined food product. It contains no nutrients beyond starch and has to be “fortified” with a vitamin premix. Unrefined rice is brown, black, or red from natural beta-carotene, B vitamins, vitamin E, fatty acids, and minerals that occur naturally in rice. When commercial processors strip the bran off the rice, they remove all these nutrients. Commercial interests sell off the bran separately, leaving a “dead” product that can sit on a shelf indefinitely.

Golden rice is genetically mutated to synthesize beta-carotene in the endosperm where starch is normally stored. Originally, golden rice had three extra genes—a daffodil gene, a gene from a bacterium that causes diseases in plants, and a plant virus. The new, improved version has six, including an antibiotic resistance gene. The new version is designed to make more beta-carotene.

Golden rice is essentially a very expensive way of putting a single vitamin—beta-carotene—inside a white rice product.

Does It Offer the Cure for Blindness?

A massive campaign to sell golden rice to Southeast Asian and African markets has been ongoing for years. It’s based on the claim that golden rice will save children from going blind from vitamin A deficiency. Vitamin A deficiency is widespread in these countries, and it causes other debilitating diseases in addition to blindness. Golden rice is the solution, according to its promoters.

Unfortunately, the whole premise is baseless:

  • Rice isn’t a primary source of vitamin A in the human diet. Yams, mangoes, greens, and other fruits and vegetables that humans eat contain much higher levels. Genetically engineering rice as a source of vitamin A makes as much sense as genetically engineering oysters as a source of fiber.
  • GE golden rice doesn’t contain the fatty acids necessary to absorb beta-carotene. Golden rice itself doesn’t provide any beta-carotene at all. Only when fat is added does it provide a source of vitamin A. This is problematic in poor countries, and the extra cost of adding a fat has to be figured in.
  • The perfect golden rice already exists. Natural, unrefined, rice contains multiple carotenoids in addition to beta-carotene, along with the fatty acids necessary to absorb them, vitamin E, B-vitamins and minerals—all in one neat little package.
  • The solution to vitamin A deficiency in poor countries is not expensive and complicated; it is simple and cheap. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the primary cause of vitamin A deficiency is intestinal parasites. Cheap, and readily available drug treatments for parasites, along with a nickel’s worth of vitamin A supplement, can significantly reduce mortality related to vitamin A deficiency in Southeast Asia and Africa.
  • Organic farming and halting the destruction of natural resources can reverse not only vitamin A deficiency, but vastly improve all aspects of nutrition.

In stark contrast to golden rice, the World Food Prize just went to developers something that will actually provide better levels of vitamin A—an orange sweet potato for cultivation in Africa. This potato could reduce children’s death rate by 25%—proof that vitamins matter tremendously for human health. Best of all—it’s not GMO!

Golden Rice Is “a Scandal of International Proportions”

Golden rice didn’t undergo animal testing before it was fed to humans.

In 2009, a brouhaha erupted when it was discovered that trials had been done in China on children. Twenty-two scientists from all over the world signed a letter of protest to Tufts University, which set up the trials. Among other things, the scientists invoked the Nuremberg Code, which prohibits medical experimentation without informed consent. In response, investigations were initiated by Tufts, the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and its Chinese equivalent, and the Chinese Ministry of Health.

According to reports, officials at the Chinese CDC were punished and parents of the children were paid damages by the Chinese government.

The first clinical trial of golden rice was set up in 2004. To date, the product has not been accepted by governments or by the public.

Serious Questions Remain about Golden Rice

  • It will contaminate natural rice, with unknown results.
  • It destroys biodiversity. Genes for golden rice are in a hybrid promoted all over the world. Planting golden rice is planting monoculture.
  • It destroys food sovereignty. Golden rice is part of a global program that makes farmers and consumers dependent on multinational corporations. It’s part of globalization, a phenomenon that doesn’t permit local autonomy.
  • It’s still full of “surprises,” even for the inventors themselves. In the latest patent on golden rice, the “unexpected phenomenon termed ‘overshoot’” is discussed. It boils down to this: the plant is engineered to synthesize lycopene, but it synthesizes other carotenoids. The inventors admit they don’t know what causes it.
  • The impact on the environment and wildlife is still unknown.
  • Foreign genes put into golden rice force it to make more beta-carotene than usual. This comes at the expense of other nutrients. The geranylgeranyl pathway that leads to the synthesis of beta-carotene also leads to the synthesis of other carotenoids and ubiquinone (co-enzyme Q10). Diverting the pathway to beta-carotene diverts synthesis away from other pathways.
  • It has been proven that GM (mutant) DNA can be transmitted to bacteria. Bacterial genes can be transmitted to animals, including humans. The ability of golden rice to transfer DNA to bacteria and other living things has not been independently investigated. Nor have the product’s long-term effects on insects and wildlife. Vitamin A plays a major role in embryonic development—minor alterations in this vitamin during development can result in major developmental defects.
  • The consequences of disrupting DNA—our ancient code that’s been in place for hundreds of millions of years—and supports every life form—is unknown.

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2dxXK13 via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2erm4k0

GM Corrupts Our DNA Code

GMOs are part of so-called “synthetic biology,” an attempt to synthesize and change the code of all living things so everything can be bought and sold as a product.

But genetic modification obliterates millions of years of adaptation to the environment. Whether you look at it as evolution or the work of God, monkeying with genes destroys life as we know it. DNA is the code for the assembly and operation of living things. It also ties living things to other living things and their environment. All living things are tied together by variations on the same code. All living creatures are evolving together: something that affects one, affects all the others.

Deleting, adding and inserting new code into DNA is financially rewarding for biophysicists and others in the short-term, but the eventual consequences of corrupting the code are likely to be a lot more complicated.

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2epD5Kh via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2erky1n

Genetic Engineering of Transgenic Creatures is Animal Abuse

Scientists have plans to pen up animals and force them to become sentient machines making proteins for agro-business and organs for humans. Animals are crossed with human genes to create transgenic creatures with organs that won’t provoke an immune response so they can be “harvested” and transplanted into humans. Most transgenic animals, if they survive, have deformities and abnormalities of all kinds because, among other things, genes can insert themselves into existing genes and corrupt the program.

Genetically modified cows born with ovaries that grew so large they caused ruptures and killed the animals.

Scientists are genetically engineering primates, including chimpanzees, with genes for catastrophic brain diseases such as Huntington’s so they can be sold for experimentation. Rhesus monkeys were genetically modified with an abnormal brain gene at the Yerkes National Primate Research Center. Some got severe disease within days and died. One survived for one month with uncontrollable muscle spasms, involuntary movement, and difficulty swallowing.

Although the lead researcher claims that transgenic animal models have made breakthroughs in treating human diseases, no breakthroughs have been made in brain diseases using monkey models. Monkeys were extensively used in experimentation on Alzheimer’s during the 1960s with zero success. There are vastly more cases of Alzheimer’s disease today than there were then. Monkeys that sit for hours on end and run in circles have been intentionally manufactured to create “autistic behavior.” But the gene forced into them doesn’t cause autism, so experimentation on these animals will not likely lead to the cause or a cure for the brain abnormality.

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2dxZJ5z via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2erlItx

GMOs Spread to Related Crops, including Organic

The USDA claims that GE crops can “coexist” with organic crops. However, the facts show otherwise. GE is “escaping” and contaminating natural plants.

GE mutations can spread to crops in the same family. The Brassica family includes the source plant for canola oil as well as cruciferous vegetables such as broccoli, Napa cabbage, cauliflower, turnips, mustard greens, and others that people eat worldwide. These vegetables, including organic ones, can be contaminated with weed killer resistant genes if GE canola “escapes.” Contamination doesn’t have to be direct. It can occur thousands of miles away when seeds spilled during transport, take root in soil, grow and cross-pollinate. This has already occurred in Japan, even though studies (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) showed that there was a very low probability of it happening.

In 2011, American researchers reported GE canola growing wild along highways in North Dakota—ten years after it was planted. The contamination was widespread, and it didn’t appear that the US government had been monitoring it. It’s not known to what extent organic Brassica vegetables are contaminated with GM.

The first “escape” of GM was reported in 2006 when Scotts Miracle-Gro and Monsanto created GM grass for golf courses and planted Roundup Ready bentgrass in Oregon. It spread and contaminated other grasses and weeds with Roundup resistance—and is documented in studies here and here. Scotts was fined $500,000 over the incident.

It was discovered in 2016 that GM alfalfa had spread and contaminated normal alfalfa.

It appears that GM plants will continue to contaminate natural plants, including organic food crops. “Coexistence” appears to be a government–industry fairy tale.

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2dxWknn via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2erk8b3

Outcomes of Genetic Engineering Are Not Predictable

Genetic engineering outcomes are inherently unpredictable. Credible scientists have proven that genetically altered DNA can be horizontally transmitted—say, from your food to your gut bacteria.

And while millions of people worry about what scientists are doing with GMOs in laboratories, a new angle has emerged: do-it-yourself “scientists” bioengineering in their basement. They’re using a kit that can be purchased online for less than $200. It’s called CRISPER (Clustered Regularly Interspersed Short Palindromic Repeat), and it exploits an ancient doorway where DNA defends itself against foreign DNA. This stretch of DNA is like a DNA immune system—it destroys potential DNA invaders. The kit circumvents the ancient firewall, allowing foreign DNA to be inserted into the genome. Anybody who wants to can do their own genetic experiments on bacteria and yeast. No lab, no license, no education, no government oversight.

diy-kit

Scientists don’t know how or why CRISPR works. Most don’t care. “People just don’t have the time to characterize some of the very basic parameters of the system,” according to Bo Huang, a biophysicist at the University of California, San Francisco. “There is a mentality that as long as it works, we don’t have to understand how or why it works.” And while the safety of the gene-altering kit isn’t remotely proven, its potential for major catastrophe is. Researchers who used CRISPR to create a breathable lung cancer virus for mice admit that a tweak or two could turn it into a breathable lung-cancer virus for humans.

At least twenty separate published studies predicted that CRISPR could be used to “repair” bad genes in humans. So when scientists geared up to fix the gene that causes a disease known as β-thalassemia in a human embryo, things looked good to go. Things didn’t go as predicted, however. CRISPR hit the right gene only 52% of the time. Of the twenty-eight correct hits, CRISPR repaired the gene only four times. Seven of the hits repaired the bad gene back to its original mutated state, and CRISPR caused multiple new mutations. Of their research, the scientists said, “Further investigation of the molecular mechanisms of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in human model is sorely needed.”

Is genetic modification more predictable in plants? Five years after he helped genetically modify “golden rice,” scientist Peter Beyer asked, “Why is golden rice golden (yellow) instead of red?” He was asking because he’d helped engineer the rice to make lycopene, a red carotenoid, and it was making beta-carotene, a yellow carotenoid. (See below for more on golden rice’s failed promises.)

One of the problems with GM is that altering a gene has global effects. When genes are altered in one area, other areas are affected. Supporters of GM explain it away by saying that genes naturally “jump around.” Geneticists would be very surprised to hear this since they see genes in humans that haven’t changed in hundreds of millions of years. Humans possess genes for hormones that were in worms 500 million years ago. They have not “jumped”.

The number of genes for nuclear receptor proteins in humans, mice, rats, dolphins, chickens, ducks, turtles, and frogs are virtually identical. The difference between the core genes of one person and the next is virtually undetectable (0.1% difference at most). Genetic variation occurs in the code between genes and in single nucleotides within genes. But genes themselves do not jump around.

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2epIv7I via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2erm6Z5

Genetic Modification is Not the Same As What People Have Been Doing for Thousands of Years

Farmers have been crossbreeding plants for thousands of years to get traits they want, such as sweetness in peaches or big petals on roses. But this breeding for a trait, done naturally with the plants’ own pollen, is far different than forcibly mixing the DNA of one species with the DNA of another. Natural breeding never adds or subtracts genes of another species. Genetic engineering forces the genes of chickens into potatoes, human genes into pigs, and other abnormal crosses that are prohibited in nature. Scientists have to use extraordinary means to force these mutations. They bombard it with radiation, chemicals, and in the case of corn, Monsanto shot it with a “gene gun,” which is exactly what it sounds like. It shoots DNA into living things, and it’s being developed for vaccination.

The results of GM are unpredictable, frequently disastrous, and not remotely the same as natural breeding. GM animals include glow-in-the-dark green monkeys and monkeys that run around in circles and have autistic-like behavior because of extra genes (see more on this below).

Forcing alien genes into DNA is highly abnormal, and is highly resisted by living things. Genes normally activate only when they get a biological signal to make a protein. But viral genes forced into GE plants are always “on,” making proteins in the absence of any signal. These abnormal genes have no connection to the rest of the organism and do not respond to normal signals.

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2dxY9Rd via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2erl8fe

Independent Studies Reveal Safety Issues with GM

Over 300 independent researchers, physicians, and scholars—none of whom has financial interests in GM—signed a statement published in Environmental Sciences Europe that there is no consensus that GMOs are safe.

Studies done by independent researchers show that GM food is not safe when fed to animals day in and day out. The animals get cancer, kidney and liver damage, and more.

Independent research on the long-term effects for humans, wildlife, and the environment simply has not been done. Most “long-term” studies last no more than ninety days, though a few last up to two years—certainly not what most people would call a long time. Many are not independent. Each and every GMO requires testing, as they can be very different in their outcomes. Yet this hasn’t been done.

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2epHe0s via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2erkazG

GM Promotes Monoculture

Genetic modification is being done on hybrid plants that already lack genetic diversity. Living things need genetic diversity to adapt to a changing environment. Widespread planting of relatively few GM crops in place of different types of crops decreases diversity, and increases the chance of crop failure.

The Irish potato famine is a lesson in monoculture. One strain of potato—resistant to drought—was planted to the exclusion of other varieties. Virtual clones, since they were grown from cuttings rather than seeds, the plants were susceptible to something new: a fungus that wiped them out (study here).

The eminent Indian rice researcher, R.H. Richharia, collected 24,000 species of rice in one region of India, and estimated there were 200,000 altogether in India. Today there are only about 6,000, due to the planting of the same types of hybrids all over the country.

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2dxY8wD via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2erj6Mw

GMO: The Truth about the Science

The truth can be very hard to get. So we’ve updated our own GMO Fact Check site. And we need to stop a new effort to use taxpayer money to spread industry propaganda. Action Alert!

Earlier this month, major biotech and agriculture groups sent a letter to key members of the House and Senate Appropriations Committee supporting the inclusion of $3 million in the fiscal year 2017 budget to “better inform the public about the application of biotechnology to food and agricultural production.” In plain English, these groups are asking for taxpayer dollars to fund propaganda efforts on behalf of the biotech industry.

This isn’t the first time this issue has come up. Back in May of this year, the same line item was being considered for inclusion in the FY 2017 budget. As the year draws to a close, the biotech industry and its front groups are ramping up efforts to get the government’s help in fixing the tarnished reputation of GMOs among the public. And we can be sure that $3 million is just the opening wedge. The total amount of taxpayer money being spent today to serve these special interests is already in the billions. And this new line item will continue to grow.

This move on Congress coincides with the recent appearance of a so-called “GMO Answers” website, which purports to provide answers to common misconceptions about GMOs. This decidedly unscientific “take” on the public’s concerns is a fabrication from something called the Council for Biotechnology Information (CBI), a front group for the biggest names in chemicals and biotech: Monsanto, Syngenta, Dow, DuPont, and Bayer.

We’ll leave it to the reader’s imagination to consider the kinds of “answers” their site provides.

For those interested in real answers to questions about GMOs, we’ve recently updated and revamped our GMO Fact Check site. We’ve included the most up-to-date information on the safety of GMOs, the facts about GMOs and pesticide use, the epidemic of cross-pollination of GMOs with conventional (and/or organic) crops, the myth that GMOs increase crop yields, and much more. Our information is science-based and fully cited. Since industry has systematically attempted to corrupt so many government agencies, universities, and researchers working in this field, simply having accurate, scientific data is an accomplishment.

It’s clear that our government, which is supposed to safeguard our health, is working hand in hand with industry to undermine it in exchange for campaign contributions and other support. Say no to spending an additional $3 million of taxpayers’ money for GMO propaganda!

Action Alert! Write to the House and Senate appropriations committees and urge them NOT to spend taxpayer dollars on biotech propaganda. Please send your message immediately.

Take-Action

Other articles in this week’s Pulse of Natural Health:

Natural Hormones on the Chopping Block Yet Again



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2epGWXy via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2eC4eyD

Golden Rice Is a Sham GMO Invention

“Golden rice” is a genetically modified rice product with murky beginnings. Calgene (the company that created Flavr-Savr tomatoes genetically modified with fish genes) held the first patent. It, and its inventor, Christine K. Shewmaker, apparently transferred to Monsanto when the company bought Calgene. Later on, the patent turned up at Syngenta under the names of two genetic engineers out of Switzerland and Germany, one of whom helped to do plant modification experiments that led to Roundup Ready crops.

The product has since been the basis of a massive campaign to promote it as a humanitarian venture of the Rockefeller Foundation-backed International Rice Research Institute—the organization that launched the “Green Revolution” in the 1960s. Syngenta and the Gates Foundation are both behind it. But how “humanitarian” is this venture, if its claims are false?

What Golden Rice Really Is

Golden rice is a GE version of white rice. White rice is a refined food product. It contains no nutrients beyond starch and has to be “fortified” with a vitamin premix. Unrefined rice is brown, black, or red from natural beta-carotene, B vitamins, vitamin E, fatty acids, and minerals that occur naturally in rice. When commercial processors strip the bran off the rice, they remove all these nutrients. Commercial interests sell off the bran separately, leaving a “dead” product that can sit on a shelf indefinitely.

Golden rice is genetically mutated to synthesize beta-carotene in the endosperm where starch is normally stored. Originally, golden rice had three extra genes—a daffodil gene, a gene from a bacterium that causes diseases in plants, and a plant virus. The new, improved version has six, including an antibiotic resistance gene. The new version is designed to make more beta-carotene.

Golden rice is essentially a very expensive way of putting a single vitamin—beta-carotene—inside a white rice product.

Does It Offer the Cure for Blindness?

A massive campaign to sell golden rice to Southeast Asian and African markets has been ongoing for years. It’s based on the claim that golden rice will save children from going blind from vitamin A deficiency. Vitamin A deficiency is widespread in these countries, and it causes other debilitating diseases in addition to blindness. Golden rice is the solution, according to its promoters.

Unfortunately, the whole premise is baseless:

  • Rice isn’t a primary source of vitamin A in the human diet. Yams, mangoes, greens, and other fruits and vegetables that humans eat contain much higher levels. Genetically engineering rice as a source of vitamin A makes as much sense as genetically engineering oysters as a source of fiber.
  • GE golden rice doesn’t contain the fatty acids necessary to absorb beta-carotene. Golden rice itself doesn’t provide any beta-carotene at all. Only when fat is added does it provide a source of vitamin A. This is problematic in poor countries, and the extra cost of adding a fat has to be figured in.
  • The perfect golden rice already exists. Natural, unrefined, rice contains multiple carotenoids in addition to beta-carotene, along with the fatty acids necessary to absorb them, vitamin E, B-vitamins and minerals—all in one neat little package.
  • The solution to vitamin A deficiency in poor countries is not expensive and complicated; it is simple and cheap. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the primary cause of vitamin A deficiency is intestinal parasites. Cheap, and readily available drug treatments for parasites, along with a nickel’s worth of vitamin A supplement, can significantly reduce mortality related to vitamin A deficiency in Southeast Asia and Africa.
  • Organic farming and halting the destruction of natural resources can reverse not only vitamin A deficiency, but vastly improve all aspects of nutrition.

In stark contrast to golden rice, the World Food Prize just went to developers something that will actually provide better levels of vitamin A—an orange sweet potato for cultivation in Africa. This potato could reduce children’s death rate by 25%—proof that vitamins matter tremendously for human health. Best of all—it’s not GMO!

Golden Rice Is “a Scandal of International Proportions”

Golden rice didn’t undergo animal testing before it was fed to humans.

In 2009, a brouhaha erupted when it was discovered that trials had been done in China on children. Twenty-two scientists from all over the world signed a letter of protest to Tufts University, which set up the trials. Among other things, the scientists invoked the Nuremberg Code, which prohibits medical experimentation without informed consent. In response, investigations were initiated by Tufts, the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and its Chinese equivalent, and the Chinese Ministry of Health.

According to reports, officials at the Chinese CDC were punished and parents of the children were paid damages by the Chinese government.

The first clinical trial of golden rice was set up in 2004. To date, the product has not been accepted by governments or by the public.

Serious Questions Remain about Golden Rice

  • It will contaminate natural rice, with unknown results.
  • It destroys biodiversity. Genes for golden rice are in a hybrid promoted all over the world. Planting golden rice is planting monoculture.
  • It destroys food sovereignty. Golden rice is part of a global program that makes farmers and consumers dependent on multinational corporations. It’s part of globalization, a phenomenon that doesn’t permit local autonomy.
  • It’s still full of “surprises,” even for the inventors themselves. In the latest patent on golden rice, the “unexpected phenomenon termed ‘overshoot’” is discussed. It boils down to this: the plant is engineered to synthesize lycopene, but it synthesizes other carotenoids. The inventors admit they don’t know what causes it.
  • The impact on the environment and wildlife is still unknown.
  • Foreign genes put into golden rice force it to make more beta-carotene than usual. This comes at the expense of other nutrients. The geranylgeranyl pathway that leads to the synthesis of beta-carotene also leads to the synthesis of other carotenoids and ubiquinone (co-enzyme Q10). Diverting the pathway to beta-carotene diverts synthesis away from other pathways.
  • It has been proven that GM (mutant) DNA can be transmitted to bacteria. Bacterial genes can be transmitted to animals, including humans. The ability of golden rice to transfer DNA to bacteria and other living things has not been independently investigated. Nor have the product’s long-term effects on insects and wildlife. Vitamin A plays a major role in embryonic development—minor alterations in this vitamin during development can result in major developmental defects.
  • The consequences of disrupting DNA—our ancient code that’s been in place for hundreds of millions of years—and supports every life form—is unknown.


from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2dxXK13 via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2eeJJFm

GM Corrupts Our DNA Code

GMOs are part of so-called “synthetic biology,” an attempt to synthesize and change the code of all living things so everything can be bought and sold as a product.

But genetic modification obliterates millions of years of adaptation to the environment. Whether you look at it as evolution or the work of God, monkeying with genes destroys life as we know it. DNA is the code for the assembly and operation of living things. It also ties living things to other living things and their environment. All living things are tied together by variations on the same code. All living creatures are evolving together: something that affects one, affects all the others.

Deleting, adding and inserting new code into DNA is financially rewarding for biophysicists and others in the short-term, but the eventual consequences of corrupting the code are likely to be a lot more complicated.



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2epD5Kh via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2eC4o96

Genetic Engineering of Transgenic Creatures is Animal Abuse

Scientists have plans to pen up animals and force them to become sentient machines making proteins for agro-business and organs for humans. Animals are crossed with human genes to create transgenic creatures with organs that won’t provoke an immune response so they can be “harvested” and transplanted into humans. Most transgenic animals, if they survive, have deformities and abnormalities of all kinds because, among other things, genes can insert themselves into existing genes and corrupt the program.

Genetically modified cows born with ovaries that grew so large they caused ruptures and killed the animals.

Scientists are genetically engineering primates, including chimpanzees, with genes for catastrophic brain diseases such as Huntington’s so they can be sold for experimentation. Rhesus monkeys were genetically modified with an abnormal brain gene at the Yerkes National Primate Research Center. Some got severe disease within days and died. One survived for one month with uncontrollable muscle spasms, involuntary movement, and difficulty swallowing.

Although the lead researcher claims that transgenic animal models have made breakthroughs in treating human diseases, no breakthroughs have been made in brain diseases using monkey models. Monkeys were extensively used in experimentation on Alzheimer’s during the 1960s with zero success. There are vastly more cases of Alzheimer’s disease today than there were then. Monkeys that sit for hours on end and run in circles have been intentionally manufactured to create “autistic behavior.” But the gene forced into them doesn’t cause autism, so experimentation on these animals will not likely lead to the cause or a cure for the brain abnormality.



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2dxZJ5z via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2eeIy8M

GMOs Spread to Related Crops, including Organic

The USDA claims that GE crops can “coexist” with organic crops. However, the facts show otherwise. GE is “escaping” and contaminating natural plants.

GE mutations can spread to crops in the same family. The Brassica family includes the source plant for canola oil as well as cruciferous vegetables such as broccoli, Napa cabbage, cauliflower, turnips, mustard greens, and others that people eat worldwide. These vegetables, including organic ones, can be contaminated with weed killer resistant genes if GE canola “escapes.” Contamination doesn’t have to be direct. It can occur thousands of miles away when seeds spilled during transport, take root in soil, grow and cross-pollinate. This has already occurred in Japan, even though studies (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) showed that there was a very low probability of it happening.

In 2011, American researchers reported GE canola growing wild along highways in North Dakota—ten years after it was planted. The contamination was widespread, and it didn’t appear that the US government had been monitoring it. It’s not known to what extent organic Brassica vegetables are contaminated with GM.

The first “escape” of GM was reported in 2006 when Scotts Miracle-Gro and Monsanto created GM grass for golf courses and planted Roundup Ready bentgrass in Oregon. It spread and contaminated other grasses and weeds with Roundup resistance—and is documented in studies here and here. Scotts was fined $500,000 over the incident.

It was discovered in 2016 that GM alfalfa had spread and contaminated normal alfalfa.

It appears that GM plants will continue to contaminate natural plants, including organic food crops. “Coexistence” appears to be a government–industry fairy tale.



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2dxWknn via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2eC5EJn

Outcomes of Genetic Engineering Are Not Predictable

Genetic engineering outcomes are inherently unpredictable. Credible scientists have proven that genetically altered DNA can be horizontally transmitted—say, from your food to your gut bacteria.

And while millions of people worry about what scientists are doing with GMOs in laboratories, a new angle has emerged: do-it-yourself “scientists” bioengineering in their basement. They’re using a kit that can be purchased online for less than $200. It’s called CRISPER (Clustered Regularly Interspersed Short Palindromic Repeat), and it exploits an ancient doorway where DNA defends itself against foreign DNA. This stretch of DNA is like a DNA immune system—it destroys potential DNA invaders. The kit circumvents the ancient firewall, allowing foreign DNA to be inserted into the genome. Anybody who wants to can do their own genetic experiments on bacteria and yeast. No lab, no license, no education, no government oversight.

diy-kit

Scientists don’t know how or why CRISPR works. Most don’t care. “People just don’t have the time to characterize some of the very basic parameters of the system,” according to Bo Huang, a biophysicist at the University of California, San Francisco. “There is a mentality that as long as it works, we don’t have to understand how or why it works.” And while the safety of the gene-altering kit isn’t remotely proven, its potential for major catastrophe is. Researchers who used CRISPR to create a breathable lung cancer virus for mice admit that a tweak or two could turn it into a breathable lung-cancer virus for humans.

At least twenty separate published studies predicted that CRISPR could be used to “repair” bad genes in humans. So when scientists geared up to fix the gene that causes a disease known as β-thalassemia in a human embryo, things looked good to go. Things didn’t go as predicted, however. CRISPR hit the right gene only 52% of the time. Of the twenty-eight correct hits, CRISPR repaired the gene only four times. Seven of the hits repaired the bad gene back to its original mutated state, and CRISPR caused multiple new mutations. Of their research, the scientists said, “Further investigation of the molecular mechanisms of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in human model is sorely needed.”

Is genetic modification more predictable in plants? Five years after he helped genetically modify “golden rice,” scientist Peter Beyer asked, “Why is golden rice golden (yellow) instead of red?” He was asking because he’d helped engineer the rice to make lycopene, a red carotenoid, and it was making beta-carotene, a yellow carotenoid. (See below for more on golden rice’s failed promises.)

One of the problems with GM is that altering a gene has global effects. When genes are altered in one area, other areas are affected. Supporters of GM explain it away by saying that genes naturally “jump around.” Geneticists would be very surprised to hear this since they see genes in humans that haven’t changed in hundreds of millions of years. Humans possess genes for hormones that were in worms 500 million years ago. They have not “jumped”.

The number of genes for nuclear receptor proteins in humans, mice, rats, dolphins, chickens, ducks, turtles, and frogs are virtually identical. The difference between the core genes of one person and the next is virtually undetectable (0.1% difference at most). Genetic variation occurs in the code between genes and in single nucleotides within genes. But genes themselves do not jump around.



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2epIv7I via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2eeHUbB

Genetic Modification is Not the Same As What People Have Been Doing for Thousands of Years

Farmers have been crossbreeding plants for thousands of years to get traits they want, such as sweetness in peaches or big petals on roses. But this breeding for a trait, done naturally with the plants’ own pollen, is far different than forcibly mixing the DNA of one species with the DNA of another. Natural breeding never adds or subtracts genes of another species. Genetic engineering forces the genes of chickens into potatoes, human genes into pigs, and other abnormal crosses that are prohibited in nature. Scientists have to use extraordinary means to force these mutations. They bombard it with radiation, chemicals, and in the case of corn, Monsanto shot it with a “gene gun,” which is exactly what it sounds like. It shoots DNA into living things, and it’s being developed for vaccination.

The results of GM are unpredictable, frequently disastrous, and not remotely the same as natural breeding. GM animals include glow-in-the-dark green monkeys and monkeys that run around in circles and have autistic-like behavior because of extra genes (see more on this below).

Forcing alien genes into DNA is highly abnormal, and is highly resisted by living things. Genes normally activate only when they get a biological signal to make a protein. But viral genes forced into GE plants are always “on,” making proteins in the absence of any signal. These abnormal genes have no connection to the rest of the organism and do not respond to normal signals.



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2dxY9Rd via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2eC5DoK

Independent Studies Reveal Safety Issues with GM

Over 300 independent researchers, physicians, and scholars—none of whom has financial interests in GM—signed a statement published in Environmental Sciences Europe that there is no consensus that GMOs are safe.

Studies done by independent researchers show that GM food is not safe when fed to animals day in and day out. The animals get cancer, kidney and liver damage, and more.

Independent research on the long-term effects for humans, wildlife, and the environment simply has not been done. Most “long-term” studies last no more than ninety days, though a few last up to two years—certainly not what most people would call a long time. Many are not independent. Each and every GMO requires testing, as they can be very different in their outcomes. Yet this hasn’t been done.



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2epHe0s via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2eeI6r9

GM Promotes Monoculture

Genetic modification is being done on hybrid plants that already lack genetic diversity. Living things need genetic diversity to adapt to a changing environment. Widespread planting of relatively few GM crops in place of different types of crops decreases diversity, and increases the chance of crop failure.

The Irish potato famine is a lesson in monoculture. One strain of potato—resistant to drought—was planted to the exclusion of other varieties. Virtual clones, since they were grown from cuttings rather than seeds, the plants were susceptible to something new: a fungus that wiped them out (study here).

The eminent Indian rice researcher, R.H. Richharia, collected 24,000 species of rice in one region of India, and estimated there were 200,000 altogether in India. Today there are only about 6,000, due to the planting of the same types of hybrids all over the country.



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2dxY8wD via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2eC72vr