Friday, June 30, 2017

CBD for Pain Reveals FDA Agenda and It’s Impact on Healthcare!

Research and clinical evidence confirms that CBD oil relieves pain [1]. This should be good news! 116m Americans suffer chronic pain [2]. Action Alert!

Other approved pain relievers may cause internal bleeding, (e.g. aspirin)[3], cause heart disease (e.g. the now banned Vioxx)[4], kill people (fentanyl, up to 100X more potent than morphine)[5], or lead to both addiction and death (e.g. opioids, killed 33,000 people in the last reported year, as many as from auto accidents [6]). By contrast, CBD oil appears to be effective, safe, and completely non-addictive [7]. It may also help control cancer and other diseases [8].

So why is the FDA trying to shut down information on this lifesaving supplement and, worse, turn it into a highly restricted, expensive prescription drug?

But wait. Is it true that the FDA plans to ban the supplement form? Here is what the Agency itself says in letters sent to CBD producers: “… FDA has concluded that CBD products are excluded from the dietary supplement definition under section 201(ff)(3)(B)(ii) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 321(ff)(3)(B)(ii)]….” [9]

Please note: CBD oil can only be sold as a dietary supplement or a drug. By denying it supplement status, the FDA is warning us that, once a drug version has been approved, the agency will move to yank the supplement from the market. The drug will require doctor visits and, as a monopoly, cost whatever the drug company chooses to charge.

Here are a few facts about CBD oil you need to know. It can be made from marijuana or from hemp [10]. Hemp does not cause a high [11]. It is in fact a super food, good for you in multiple ways [12].

The US government is totally confused about this. One agency, the DEA, says that hemp and hemp extracts are a schedule 1 drug (this means no possible medicinal use) [13]. Another agency, HHS, owns a medical patent on CBD [14]. The FDA is reviewing it as a prescription drug. Meanwhile the federal government does not allow US farmers to grow hemp, but allows foreign producers to sell it to us [15]. And state attorneys general are threatening to sue opioid producers [16].

It gets worse. A drug company has patented CBD oil for epilepsy [17] and has applied to the FDA for orphan drug approval [18]. It’s questionable that CBD has a significant impact on epilepsy [19] (although it can be treated by diet [20]). So why apply for epilepsy/seizures? Because orphan drug approvals cost less. And once the supplement version is banned, this will be the only legal source. Doctors can still prescribe it “off-label” for anything, including pain [21]. The pain market will be enormous. The FDA understands this. All the insiders are winking at each other. Everyone wins except for the public, who will face restricted access and skyrocketing costs.

This is not an isolated case. There are hundreds of similar stories. Natural treatments are often more effective, safer, and far cheaper than synthetic drugs. But the FDA either bars any discussion of them [22] or kicks them out of the healthcare system [23], thereby creating more drug monopolies.

In prior years, this was mostly done by creating synthetic analogues which, unlike natural products, are patentable, but which, being new to our bodies, often turn out to be toxic. As this has become more problematic, the new trend is for drug companies to claim “novel use” patents (as with CBD) or more commonly the FDA will just seize the natural product and turn it into a protected monopoly free from price competition [24].

Science tells us that food is medicine [25]. But the FDA will put you in jail for mentioning any medical benefit from a particular food. For example, the Agency threatened cherry and walnut producers with jail because they had dared to cite some good science about the health benefits of these common super foods [26].

Healthcare costs so much in general because the government keeps creating medical monopolies. We have them for practitioners as well as for medical treatments. For example, we do not allow nurses to use their full training in treating patients [27].

This is why we need a consumer-run healthcare system which could succeed or just run alongside Obamacare. It is the only way to keep healthcare from bankrupting our country.

What can Congress do right now? Remove hemp from the DEA list. Allow our farmers to grow it. Don’t allow the FDA to ban it as a supplement.

 

Other articles in this week’s Pulse of Natural Health:

Drug Deception

Lawsuit Revelation

 

Notes:

1) http://ift.tt/2rGD8bC

2) http://ift.tt/2sZLI9d

3) http://ift.tt/2rGSj4D

4) http://ift.tt/2sZCwBG

5) http://ift.tt/2oQC4zL

6) http://ift.tt/2r4JeBV

7) http://ift.tt/2rGSlcL

8) http://ift.tt/2g3EJmL

9) http://ift.tt/2rGhN24

10  http://ift.tt/2sZYqF3

11) http://ift.tt/2rGzI8O

12) Hemp seeds as super foods: http://ift.tt/2n159Zg and

http://ift.tt/2rGlZyN

13) http://ift.tt/2gBmYcU

14) http://ift.tt/1oqoPjS

15) http://ift.tt/1jDj4NH

16) http://ift.tt/2tvC0YX

17) http://ift.tt/2sZHDSu

18) http://ift.tt/1Sy0Xxx

19) http://ift.tt/2l1gqbH and

http://ift.tt/2rGqMjt and http://ift.tt/2sZNx64

20) The condition reportedly responds to a ketogenic diet http://ift.tt/2rGfPyA . Also see Mercola, Joseph, MD. Fat For Fuel. Carlsbad, CA 2016.

21) http://ift.tt/2kRTs6K

22) http://ift.tt/2a5SbWF

23) http://ift.tt/2bvGU30

24) Ibid.

25) http://ift.tt/2rGzFKa

26) http://ift.tt/2a5SbWF

27) http://ift.tt/2sZWYCj

 

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2u6rBny via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2sYJwxO

CBD for Pain Reveals FDA Agenda and It’s Impact on Healthcare!

Research and clinical evidence confirms that CBD oil relieves pain [1]. This should be good news! 116m Americans suffer chronic pain [2]. Action Alert!

Other approved pain relievers may cause internal bleeding, (e.g. aspirin)[3], cause heart disease (e.g. the now banned Vioxx)[4], kill people (fentanyl, up to 100X more potent than morphine)[5], or lead to both addiction and death (e.g. opioids, killed 33,000 people in the last reported year, as many as from auto accidents [6]). By contrast, CBD oil appears to be effective, safe, and completely non-addictive [7]. It may also help control cancer and other diseases [8].

So why is the FDA trying to shut down information on this lifesaving supplement and, worse, turn it into a highly restricted, expensive prescription drug?

But wait. Is it true that the FDA plans to ban the supplement form? Here is what the Agency itself says in letters sent to CBD producers: “… FDA has concluded that CBD products are excluded from the dietary supplement definition under section 201(ff)(3)(B)(ii) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 321(ff)(3)(B)(ii)]….” [9]

Please note: CBD oil can only be sold as a dietary supplement or a drug. By denying it supplement status, the FDA is warning us that, once a drug version has been approved, the agency will move to yank the supplement from the market. The drug will require doctor visits and, as a monopoly, cost whatever the drug company chooses to charge.

Here are a few facts about CBD oil you need to know. It can be made from marijuana or from hemp [10]. Hemp does not cause a high [11]. It is in fact a super food, good for you in multiple ways [12].

The US government is totally confused about this. One agency, the DEA, says that hemp and hemp extracts are a schedule 1 drug (this means no possible medicinal use) [13]. Another agency, HHS, owns a medical patent on CBD [14]. The FDA is reviewing it as a prescription drug. Meanwhile the federal government does not allow US farmers to grow hemp, but allows foreign producers to sell it to us [15]. And state attorneys general are threatening to sue opioid producers [16].

It gets worse. A drug company has patented CBD oil for epilepsy [17] and has applied to the FDA for orphan drug approval [18]. It’s questionable that CBD has a significant impact on epilepsy [19] (although it can be treated by diet [20]). So why apply for epilepsy/seizures? Because orphan drug approvals cost less. And once the supplement version is banned, this will be the only legal source. Doctors can still prescribe it “off-label” for anything, including pain [21]. The pain market will be enormous. The FDA understands this. All the insiders are winking at each other. Everyone wins except for the public, who will face restricted access and skyrocketing costs.

This is not an isolated case. There are hundreds of similar stories. Natural treatments are often more effective, safer, and far cheaper than synthetic drugs. But the FDA either bars any discussion of them [22] or kicks them out of the healthcare system [23], thereby creating more drug monopolies.

In prior years, this was mostly done by creating synthetic analogues which, unlike natural products, are patentable, but which, being new to our bodies, often turn out to be toxic. As this has become more problematic, the new trend is for drug companies to claim “novel use” patents (as with CBD) or more commonly the FDA will just seize the natural product and turn it into a protected monopoly free from price competition [24].

Science tells us that food is medicine [25]. But the FDA will put you in jail for mentioning any medical benefit from a particular food. For example, the Agency threatened cherry and walnut producers with jail because they had dared to cite some good science about the health benefits of these common super foods [26].

Healthcare costs so much in general because the government keeps creating medical monopolies. We have them for practitioners as well as for medical treatments. For example, we do not allow nurses to use their full training in treating patients [27].

This is why we need a consumer-run healthcare system which could succeed or just run alongside Obamacare. It is the only way to keep healthcare from bankrupting our country.

What can Congress do right now? Remove hemp from the DEA list. Allow our farmers to grow it. Don’t allow the FDA to ban it as a supplement.

 

Other articles in this week’s Pulse of Natural Health:

Drug Deception

Lawsuit Revelation

 

Notes:

1) http://ift.tt/2rGD8bC

2) http://ift.tt/2sZLI9d

3) http://ift.tt/2rGSj4D

4) http://ift.tt/2sZCwBG

5) http://ift.tt/2oQC4zL

6) http://ift.tt/2r4JeBV

7) http://ift.tt/2rGSlcL

8) http://ift.tt/2g3EJmL

9) http://ift.tt/2rGhN24

10  http://ift.tt/2sZYqF3

11) http://ift.tt/2rGzI8O

12) Hemp seeds as super foods: http://ift.tt/2n159Zg and

http://ift.tt/2rGlZyN

13) http://ift.tt/2gBmYcU

14) http://ift.tt/1oqoPjS

15) http://ift.tt/1jDj4NH

16) http://ift.tt/2tvC0YX

17) http://ift.tt/2sZHDSu

18) http://ift.tt/1Sy0Xxx

19) http://ift.tt/2l1gqbH and

http://ift.tt/2rGqMjt and http://ift.tt/2sZNx64

20) The condition reportedly responds to a ketogenic diet http://ift.tt/2rGfPyA . Also see Mercola, Joseph, MD. Fat For Fuel. Carlsbad, CA 2016.

21) http://ift.tt/2kRTs6K

22) http://ift.tt/2a5SbWF

23) http://ift.tt/2bvGU30

24) Ibid.

25) http://ift.tt/2rGzFKa

26) http://ift.tt/2a5SbWF

27) http://ift.tt/2sZWYCj

 



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2u6rBny via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2ttrbtB

Thursday, June 29, 2017

Feminine Products: Why Are Producers Hiding What Is In Them?

A new bill in Congress pushes for more transparency, which is definitely needed. Action Alert!

A recently introduced bill, the Menstrual Products Right To Know Act, would require companies to provide a detailed list of everything in menstrual products. Because the FDA classifies tampons, pads, and other feminine care products as medical devices, manufacturers are not required to list individual ingredients on product labels, and, until recently, we have not known what was in these sensitive products.

A report from Women’s Voices for the Earth found that feminine care products may contain a wide array of scary chemicals. For example, tampons may contain dioxins and furans from the chemical bleaching process, pesticide residues, and unknown fragrance chemicals. Other products like pads may contain adhesive chemicals in addition to pesticides and byproducts of the bleaching process. Exposure to these chemicals puts women at risk for cancer, reproductive harm, endocrine disruption, and allergic rash.

The danger is amplified by the fact that these products are used in and around the vagina, which is an incredibly sensitive and absorbent part of the body—meaning that chemicals in these products have a direct entryway to the bloodstream and wider circulation throughout the body.

American women have a right to know what is in the feminine care products they buy.

Action Alert! Write to your representative and urge him or her to support the Menstrual Products Right To Know Act. Please send your message immediately.

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2s66xfl via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2unYqeW

Action Alert: Support the Menstrual Products Right to Know Act

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2toHBDM via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2uofy4a

Feminine Products: Why Are Producers Hiding What Is In Them?

A new bill in Congress pushes for more transparency, which is definitely needed. Action Alert!

A recently introduced bill, the Menstrual Products Right To Know Act, would require companies to provide a detailed list of everything in menstrual products. Because the FDA classifies tampons, pads, and other feminine care products as medical devices, manufacturers are not required to list individual ingredients on product labels, and, until recently, we have not known what was in these sensitive products.

A report from Women’s Voices for the Earth found that feminine care products may contain a wide array of scary chemicals. For example, tampons may contain dioxins and furans from the chemical bleaching process, pesticide residues, and unknown fragrance chemicals. Other products like pads may contain adhesive chemicals in addition to pesticides and byproducts of the bleaching process. Exposure to these chemicals puts women at risk for cancer, reproductive harm, endocrine disruption, and allergic rash.

The danger is amplified by the fact that these products are used in and around the vagina, which is an incredibly sensitive and absorbent part of the body—meaning that chemicals in these products have a direct entryway to the bloodstream and wider circulation throughout the body.

American women have a right to know what is in the feminine care products they buy.

Action Alert! Write to your representative and urge him or her to support the Menstrual Products Right To Know Act. Please send your message immediately.



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2s66xfl via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2sVxRQd

Action Alert: Support the Menstrual Products Right to Know Act



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2toHBDM via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2sqZGfU

Wednesday, June 28, 2017

Coconut Oil Bad for You?

No. Just the opposite.

Given the evidence favoring coconut oil, why is a new report from the American Heart Association (AHA) promoting this falsehood? And why is the media spreading it with headlines like “Coconut Oil Isn’t the Miracle Food You Thought It Was” and “Coconut Oil Isn’t Healthy. It’s Never Been Healthy.

None of this is a departure for the AHA; they’ve been saying the same thing since the early 1960’s: saturated fats are bad because they raise low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, which the AHA claims is a leading cause of atherosclerosis (plaque building up in arteries). The Association also believes saturated fats should be replaced with polyunsaturated fats like margarine and vegetable oils, and, in their new report, they claim this switch can reduce cardiovascular disease risk by 30%.

This is a stunning finding, but stunningly wrong.

One of the four big studies the AHA points to as “proof” that saturated fat is “bad” and polyunsaturated vegetable fats are “good” is a study from 1969.  Although the AHA rightfully points out that the number of men dying of a heart attack was greater in the men getting a “standard American diet” than the vegetable oil diet, it fails to mention that total deaths were the same in both groups.  That’s because men on the vegetable oil diet died of cancer at almost twice the rate of the ones on the standard American diet.  Further, the researchers attributed the beneficial effect of vegetable oil to its vitamin E content, not the fact that it was polyunsaturated fat.

The AHA has arrived at its conclusions by ignoring a mounting pile of scientific evidence — all more recent than 1969— that exonerates saturated fat as the cause of heart disease and death. Recently, raw, unpublished data from a double blind, randomized controlled trial conducted between 1968 and 1973 with ten thousand participants, making it the largest trial of its kind, was re-reviewed. The results? When researchers analyzed the old data, they found that polyunsaturated fats did reduce cholesterol, but this didn’t result in improved health.

The research actually showed that the lower the cholesterol, the higher the overall risk of dying. Other studies show the same thing, which is especially concerning given the overuse of statins, which not only reduce cholesterol, but also bring side effects such as muscle damage (the heart is a muscle) and diabetes.

Other large trials similarly show that cutting saturated fat doesn’t help you live longer, including the Oslo Study, the London Soybean Oil trial, and the US Multiple Risk Factor Intervention trial. Some of the trials did show a slight decrease in coronary heart disease from replacing saturated fat with vegetable oils, but mortality from all other causes was higher when saturated fat was cut. (For even more on the scientific analysis of why the AHA is wrong, check out the write-up from our friends at ANH-International and this analysis from science writer Gary Taubes.)

What about coconut oil, in particular? The AHA recommends flat out against using it because of its high saturated fat content. Once again, they have it all wrong. It’s been proven many times over that virgin coconut oil is a super food and one of the best things you can eat. It contains polyphenols which have many benefits, including reducing inflammation, protecting your cardiovascular system, fighting free radicals, inhibiting the growth of tumors.

Coconut oil also has promise in protecting against and reversing Alzheimer’s and other neurodegenerative diseases. And it is a key tool in a ketogenic diet, which helps people lose weight, control blood sugar, and generally improve health., and can also be used as part of a program of dental hygiene.

Virgin coconut oil also contains lauric acid, a medium-chain fatty acid. A recent study shows that lauric acid does not make people fat—just the opposite.  It normalizes weight and blood lipids in heart patients and when given to mother mice, lowers the weight of their offspring.

The AHA couldn’t be more wrong about saturated fat in general and coconut oil in particular. The question must then arise: why are they saying these things in the face of such strong scientific evidence rebutting them? We hate to say this, but once again we have to look at their donors. Like many other such organizations, they are supported by Big Food companies, which have an interest in promoting the oils that the AHA advocates. And the media depends on Big Food for advertising.

Suffice to say, if you’re looking for the most up-to-date dietary advice, it would be best to look elsewhere, such as a advisors certified by the Board of Nutrition Specialists, integrative doctors, including four year trained Naturopaths. A superb on-line source is mercola.com.

 

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2smvL8M via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2t1u9D6

Coconut Oil Bad for You?

No. Just the opposite.

Given the evidence favoring coconut oil, why is a new report from the American Heart Association (AHA) promoting this falsehood? And why is the media spreading it with headlines like “Coconut Oil Isn’t the Miracle Food You Thought It Was” and “Coconut Oil Isn’t Healthy. It’s Never Been Healthy.

None of this is a departure for the AHA; they’ve been saying the same thing since the early 1960’s: saturated fats are bad because they raise low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, which the AHA claims is a leading cause of atherosclerosis (plaque building up in arteries). The Association also believes saturated fats should be replaced with polyunsaturated fats like margarine and vegetable oils, and, in their new report, they claim this switch can reduce cardiovascular disease risk by 30%.

This is a stunning finding, but stunningly wrong.

One of the four big studies the AHA points to as “proof” that saturated fat is “bad” and polyunsaturated vegetable fats are “good” is a study from 1969.  Although the AHA rightfully points out that the number of men dying of a heart attack was greater in the men getting a “standard American diet” than the vegetable oil diet, it fails to mention that total deaths were the same in both groups.  That’s because men on the vegetable oil diet died of cancer at almost twice the rate of the ones on the standard American diet.  Further, the researchers attributed the beneficial effect of vegetable oil to its vitamin E content, not the fact that it was polyunsaturated fat.

The AHA has arrived at its conclusions by ignoring a mounting pile of scientific evidence — all more recent than 1969— that exonerates saturated fat as the cause of heart disease and death. Recently, raw, unpublished data from a double blind, randomized controlled trial conducted between 1968 and 1973 with ten thousand participants, making it the largest trial of its kind, was re-reviewed. The results? When researchers analyzed the old data, they found that polyunsaturated fats did reduce cholesterol, but this didn’t result in improved health.

The research actually showed that the lower the cholesterol, the higher the overall risk of dying. Other studies show the same thing, which is especially concerning given the overuse of statins, which not only reduce cholesterol, but also bring side effects such as muscle damage (the heart is a muscle) and diabetes.

Other large trials similarly show that cutting saturated fat doesn’t help you live longer, including the Oslo Study, the London Soybean Oil trial, and the US Multiple Risk Factor Intervention trial. Some of the trials did show a slight decrease in coronary heart disease from replacing saturated fat with vegetable oils, but mortality from all other causes was higher when saturated fat was cut. (For even more on the scientific analysis of why the AHA is wrong, check out the write-up from our friends at ANH-International and this analysis from science writer Gary Taubes.)

What about coconut oil, in particular? The AHA recommends flat out against using it because of its high saturated fat content. Once again, they have it all wrong. It’s been proven many times over that virgin coconut oil is a super food and one of the best things you can eat. It contains polyphenols which have many benefits, including reducing inflammation, protecting your cardiovascular system, fighting free radicals, inhibiting the growth of tumors.

Coconut oil also has promise in protecting against and reversing Alzheimer’s and other neurodegenerative diseases. And it is a key tool in a ketogenic diet, which helps people lose weight, control blood sugar, and generally improve health., and can also be used as part of a program of dental hygiene.

Virgin coconut oil also contains lauric acid, a medium-chain fatty acid. A recent study shows that lauric acid does not make people fat—just the opposite.  It normalizes weight and blood lipids in heart patients and when given to mother mice, lowers the weight of their offspring.

The AHA couldn’t be more wrong about saturated fat in general and coconut oil in particular. The question must then arise: why are they saying these things in the face of such strong scientific evidence rebutting them? We hate to say this, but once again we have to look at their donors. Like many other such organizations, they are supported by Big Food companies, which have an interest in promoting the oils that the AHA advocates. And the media depends on Big Food for advertising.

Suffice to say, if you’re looking for the most up-to-date dietary advice, it would be best to look elsewhere, such as a advisors certified by the Board of Nutrition Specialists, integrative doctors, including four year trained Naturopaths. A superb on-line source is mercola.com.

 



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2smvL8M via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2tljKEt

Monday, June 26, 2017

Pharma Pirates Creating CBD Monopoly (With FDA Assistance)

Action Alert

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2tcb1EC via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2tcG1o5

Pharma Pirates Creating CBD Monopoly (With FDA Assistance)

Action Alert



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2tcb1EC via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2sJZ4pa

Can’t Touch This: FDA Set to Bar Americans from Vital Pain Treatment

Research and clinical evidence confirms that CBD oil relieves pain [1]. This should be good news! 116m Americans suffer chronic pain [2].

Other approved pain relievers may cause internal bleeding, (e.g. aspirin)[3], cause heart disease (e.g. the now banned Vioxx)[4], kill people (fentanyl, up to 100X more potent than morphine)[5], or lead to both addiction and death (e.g. opioids, killed 33,000 people in the last reported year, as many as from auto accidents [6]). By contrast, CBD oil appears to be effective, safe, and completely non-addictive [7]. It may also help control cancer and other diseases [8].

So why is the FDA trying to shut down information on this lifesaving supplement and, worse, turn it into a highly restricted, expensive prescription drug?

But wait. Is it true that the FDA plans to ban the supplement form? Here is what the Agency itself says in letters sent to CBD producers: “… FDA has concluded that CBD products are excluded from the dietary supplement definition under section 201(ff)(3)(B)(ii) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 321(ff)(3)(B)(ii)]….” [9]

Please note: CBD oil can only be sold as a dietary supplement or a drug. By denying it supplement status, the FDA is warning us that, once a drug version has been approved, the agency will move to yank the supplement from the market. The drug will require doctor visits and, as a monopoly, cost whatever the drug company chooses to charge.

Here are a few facts about CBD oil you need to know. It can be made from marijuana or from hemp [10]. Hemp does not cause a high [11]. It is in fact a super food, good for you in multiple ways [12].

The US government is totally confused about this. One agency, the DEA, says that hemp and hemp extracts are a schedule 1 drug (this means no possible medicinal use) [13]. Another agency, HHS, owns a medical patent on CBD [14]. The FDA is reviewing it as a prescription drug. Meanwhile the federal government does not allow US farmers to grow hemp, but allows foreign producers to sell it to us [15]. And state attorneys general are threatening to sue opioid producers [16].

It gets worse. A drug company has patented CBD oil for epilepsy [17] and has applied to the FDA for orphan drug approval [18]. It’s questionable that CBD has a significant impact on epilepsy [19] (although it can be treated by diet [20]). So why apply for epilepsy/seizures? Because orphan drug approvals cost less. And once the supplement version is banned, this will be the only legal source. Doctors can still prescribe it “off-label” for anything, including pain [21]. The pain market will be enormous. The FDA understands this. All the insiders are winking at each other. Everyone wins except for the public, who will face restricted access and skyrocketing costs.

This is not an isolated case. There are hundreds of similar stories. Natural treatments are often more effective, safer, and far cheaper than synthetic drugs. But the FDA either bars any discussion of them [22] or kicks them out of the healthcare system [23], thereby creating more drug monopolies.

In prior years, this was mostly done by creating synthetic analogues which, unlike natural products, are patentable, but which, being new to our bodies, often turn out to be toxic. As this has become more problematic, the new trend is for drug companies to claim “novel use” patents (as with CBD) or more commonly the FDA will just seize the natural product and turn it into a protected monopoly free from price competition [24].

Science tells us that food is medicine [25]. But the FDA will put you in jail for mentioning any medical benefit from a particular food. For example, the Agency threatened cherry and walnut producers with jail because they had dared to cite some good science about the health benefits of these common super foods [26].

Healthcare costs so much in general because the government keeps creating medical monopolies. We have them for practitioners as well as for medical treatments. For example, we do not allow nurses to use their full training in treating patients [27].

This is why we need a consumer-run healthcare system which could succeed or just run alongside Obamacare. It is the only way to keep healthcare from bankrupting our country.

What can Congress do right now? Remove hemp from the DEA list. Allow our farmers to grow it. Don’t allow the FDA to ban it as a supplement.

Other articles in this week’s Pulse of Natural Health:

 

Notes:

1) http://ift.tt/2rGD8bC

2) http://ift.tt/2sZLI9d

3) http://ift.tt/2rGSj4D

4) http://ift.tt/2sZCwBG

5) http://ift.tt/2oQC4zL

6) http://ift.tt/2r4JeBV

7) http://ift.tt/2rGSlcL

8) http://ift.tt/2g3EJmL

9) http://ift.tt/2rGhN24

10  http://ift.tt/2sZYqF3

11) http://ift.tt/2rGzI8O

12) Hemp seeds as super foods: http://ift.tt/2n159Zg and

http://ift.tt/2rGlZyN

13) http://ift.tt/2gBmYcU

14) http://ift.tt/1oqoPjS

15) http://ift.tt/1jDj4NH

16) http://ift.tt/2tvC0YX

17) http://ift.tt/2sZHDSu

18) http://ift.tt/1Sy0Xxx

19) http://ift.tt/2l1gqbH and

http://ift.tt/2rGqMjt and http://ift.tt/2sZNx64

20) The condition reportedly responds to a ketogenic diet http://ift.tt/2rGfPyA . Also see Mercola, Joseph, MD. Fat For Fuel. Carlsbad, CA 2016.

21) http://ift.tt/2kRTs6K

22) http://ift.tt/2a5SbWF

23) http://ift.tt/2bvGU30

24) Ibid.

25) http://ift.tt/2rGzFKa

26) http://ift.tt/2a5SbWF

27) http://ift.tt/2sZWYCj

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2tcAaQ4 via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2tMiiJ9

Can’t Touch This: FDA Set to Bar Americans from Vital Pain Treatment

Research and clinical evidence confirms that CBD oil relieves pain [1]. This should be good news! 116m Americans suffer chronic pain [2].

Other approved pain relievers may cause internal bleeding, (e.g. aspirin)[3], cause heart disease (e.g. the now banned Vioxx)[4], kill people (fentanyl, up to 100X more potent than morphine)[5], or lead to both addiction and death (e.g. opioids, killed 33,000 people in the last reported year, as many as from auto accidents [6]). By contrast, CBD oil appears to be effective, safe, and completely non-addictive [7]. It may also help control cancer and other diseases [8].

So why is the FDA trying to shut down information on this lifesaving supplement and, worse, turn it into a highly restricted, expensive prescription drug?

But wait. Is it true that the FDA plans to ban the supplement form? Here is what the Agency itself says in letters sent to CBD producers: “… FDA has concluded that CBD products are excluded from the dietary supplement definition under section 201(ff)(3)(B)(ii) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 321(ff)(3)(B)(ii)]….” [9]

Please note: CBD oil can only be sold as a dietary supplement or a drug. By denying it supplement status, the FDA is warning us that, once a drug version has been approved, the agency will move to yank the supplement from the market. The drug will require doctor visits and, as a monopoly, cost whatever the drug company chooses to charge.

Here are a few facts about CBD oil you need to know. It can be made from marijuana or from hemp [10]. Hemp does not cause a high [11]. It is in fact a super food, good for you in multiple ways [12].

The US government is totally confused about this. One agency, the DEA, says that hemp and hemp extracts are a schedule 1 drug (this means no possible medicinal use) [13]. Another agency, HHS, owns a medical patent on CBD [14]. The FDA is reviewing it as a prescription drug. Meanwhile the federal government does not allow US farmers to grow hemp, but allows foreign producers to sell it to us [15]. And state attorneys general are threatening to sue opioid producers [16].

It gets worse. A drug company has patented CBD oil for epilepsy [17] and has applied to the FDA for orphan drug approval [18]. It’s questionable that CBD has a significant impact on epilepsy [19] (although it can be treated by diet [20]). So why apply for epilepsy/seizures? Because orphan drug approvals cost less. And once the supplement version is banned, this will be the only legal source. Doctors can still prescribe it “off-label” for anything, including pain [21]. The pain market will be enormous. The FDA understands this. All the insiders are winking at each other. Everyone wins except for the public, who will face restricted access and skyrocketing costs.

This is not an isolated case. There are hundreds of similar stories. Natural treatments are often more effective, safer, and far cheaper than synthetic drugs. But the FDA either bars any discussion of them [22] or kicks them out of the healthcare system [23], thereby creating more drug monopolies.

In prior years, this was mostly done by creating synthetic analogues which, unlike natural products, are patentable, but which, being new to our bodies, often turn out to be toxic. As this has become more problematic, the new trend is for drug companies to claim “novel use” patents (as with CBD) or more commonly the FDA will just seize the natural product and turn it into a protected monopoly free from price competition [24].

Science tells us that food is medicine [25]. But the FDA will put you in jail for mentioning any medical benefit from a particular food. For example, the Agency threatened cherry and walnut producers with jail because they had dared to cite some good science about the health benefits of these common super foods [26].

Healthcare costs so much in general because the government keeps creating medical monopolies. We have them for practitioners as well as for medical treatments. For example, we do not allow nurses to use their full training in treating patients [27].

This is why we need a consumer-run healthcare system which could succeed or just run alongside Obamacare. It is the only way to keep healthcare from bankrupting our country.

What can Congress do right now? Remove hemp from the DEA list. Allow our farmers to grow it. Don’t allow the FDA to ban it as a supplement.

Other articles in this week’s Pulse of Natural Health:

 

Notes:

1) http://ift.tt/2rGD8bC

2) http://ift.tt/2sZLI9d

3) http://ift.tt/2rGSj4D

4) http://ift.tt/2sZCwBG

5) http://ift.tt/2oQC4zL

6) http://ift.tt/2r4JeBV

7) http://ift.tt/2rGSlcL

8) http://ift.tt/2g3EJmL

9) http://ift.tt/2rGhN24

10  http://ift.tt/2sZYqF3

11) http://ift.tt/2rGzI8O

12) Hemp seeds as super foods: http://ift.tt/2n159Zg and

http://ift.tt/2rGlZyN

13) http://ift.tt/2gBmYcU

14) http://ift.tt/1oqoPjS

15) http://ift.tt/1jDj4NH

16) http://ift.tt/2tvC0YX

17) http://ift.tt/2sZHDSu

18) http://ift.tt/1Sy0Xxx

19) http://ift.tt/2l1gqbH and

http://ift.tt/2rGqMjt and http://ift.tt/2sZNx64

20) The condition reportedly responds to a ketogenic diet http://ift.tt/2rGfPyA . Also see Mercola, Joseph, MD. Fat For Fuel. Carlsbad, CA 2016.

21) http://ift.tt/2kRTs6K

22) http://ift.tt/2a5SbWF

23) http://ift.tt/2bvGU30

24) Ibid.

25) http://ift.tt/2rGzFKa

26) http://ift.tt/2a5SbWF

27) http://ift.tt/2sZWYCj



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2tcAaQ4 via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2tcWAku

Friday, June 23, 2017

Drug Deception

Bill Sardi has an excellent piece in lewrockwell.com that needs to be read by every consumer and lawmaker. The article explains how drug inserts deceive and thereby deny every American the right to know the truth about what they are putting in their body. Action Alert!

While drug companies are required to warn of certain side effects, there’s a whole slew of information that is withheld from consumers. Other information appears to be intentionally distorted.

For example, if a drug helps three people out of one hundred while a placebo helps two, that might be presented as 50% better, which is very misleading. When side effects are discussed, it reverts to being one person in a hundred rather than 50% more. There is no conceivable justification for presenting benefits one way and side effects another way.

This is not the only deception in drug marketing. We reported recently that, of the top ten blockbuster drugs, the most effective ones work for only one in four patients. The performance of others is far worse. Crestor (a statin) is effective for only one in eighteen patients, and Nexium (an acid blocker) helps only one in twenty-five (actually we think it injures far more than it helps). As Sardi points out, when effectiveness is reported honestly, the chance of adverse side effects is often greater than the chance of getting any benefit from the drug.

Drug inserts also hide the fact that drugs deplete key nutrients. Acid blockers, for instance, interfere with the body’s absorption of key minerals as well as vitamin D. Cox-2 inhibitors reduce levels of vitamin B6. Antibiotics deplete magnesium, calcium, potassium, vitamin K, and more. Do federal regulators think this information is not relevant to consumers?

In addition, package inserts do not disclose that the FDA relies on industry studies to evaluate safety and effectiveness. These are often short-term studies, meaning drugs are approved without knowing the potential long-term consequences. This is why the FDA is often forced to backtrack after approval and issue black box warning or post-market safety communications.

The FDA is responsible for inserts which legally are considered part of the label. It has issued loose rules about package inserts and medication guides, but they are pretty flimsy and largely voluntary. Some medications are required to be issued with medication guides only when the agency determines that such information is necessary to avoid “serious adverse events” or that specific instructions for taking the medicine are required for safety. But as noted above, the information is often both incomplete and distorted.

The FTC is also complicit in this deception, since that agency is responsible for protecting consumers from deceptive advertising. Big drug companies seem to get a pass on their deceptive advertising. Meanwhile both agencies are relentlessly hostile toward any natural product that tries to share valid scientific information with consumers. For example, look at the crusade against POM Wonderful or cherry or walnut growers.

Action Alert! Send a message to the FDA , FTC, and Congress asking them to take action to stop deceptive drug package inserts. Please send your message immediately.

 

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2sJhaWv via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2rK5n9f

Action Alert: Deceptive Drug Inserts

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2sJwvqb via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2tBDYYk

Drug Deception

Bill Sardi has an excellent piece in lewrockwell.com that needs to be read by every consumer and lawmaker. The article explains how drug inserts deceive and thereby deny every American the right to know the truth about what they are putting in their body. Action Alert!

While drug companies are required to warn of certain side effects, there’s a whole slew of information that is withheld from consumers. Other information appears to be intentionally distorted.

For example, if a drug helps three people out of one hundred while a placebo helps two, that might be presented as 50% better, which is very misleading. When side effects are discussed, it reverts to being one person in a hundred rather than 50% more. There is no conceivable justification for presenting benefits one way and side effects another way.

This is not the only deception in drug marketing. We reported recently that, of the top ten blockbuster drugs, the most effective ones work for only one in four patients. The performance of others is far worse. Crestor (a statin) is effective for only one in eighteen patients, and Nexium (an acid blocker) helps only one in twenty-five (actually we think it injures far more than it helps). As Sardi points out, when effectiveness is reported honestly, the chance of adverse side effects is often greater than the chance of getting any benefit from the drug.

Drug inserts also hide the fact that drugs deplete key nutrients. Acid blockers, for instance, interfere with the body’s absorption of key minerals as well as vitamin D. Cox-2 inhibitors reduce levels of vitamin B6. Antibiotics deplete magnesium, calcium, potassium, vitamin K, and more. Do federal regulators think this information is not relevant to consumers?

In addition, package inserts do not disclose that the FDA relies on industry studies to evaluate safety and effectiveness. These are often short-term studies, meaning drugs are approved without knowing the potential long-term consequences. This is why the FDA is often forced to backtrack after approval and issue black box warning or post-market safety communications.

The FDA is responsible for inserts which legally are considered part of the label. It has issued loose rules about package inserts and medication guides, but they are pretty flimsy and largely voluntary. Some medications are required to be issued with medication guides only when the agency determines that such information is necessary to avoid “serious adverse events” or that specific instructions for taking the medicine are required for safety. But as noted above, the information is often both incomplete and distorted.

The FTC is also complicit in this deception, since that agency is responsible for protecting consumers from deceptive advertising. Big drug companies seem to get a pass on their deceptive advertising. Meanwhile both agencies are relentlessly hostile toward any natural product that tries to share valid scientific information with consumers. For example, look at the crusade against POM Wonderful or cherry or walnut growers.

Action Alert! Send a message to the FDA , FTC, and Congress asking them to take action to stop deceptive drug package inserts. Please send your message immediately.

 



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2sJhaWv via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2tBUp72

Action Alert: Deceptive Drug Inserts



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2sJwvqb via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2t2WRGb

Thursday, June 22, 2017

Lawsuit Revelation

Government relying on Monsanto’s word that Roundup herbicide is safe?

We’ve been following a lawsuit filed by a group of citizens against Monsanto claiming that glyphosate, the active ingredient in the Roundup herbicide, causes non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.

That ongoing case took an interesting turn when recently revealed court documents show the plaintiffs are alleging that Monsanto ghostwrote the scientific reports relied upon by the EPA to determine glyphosate does not cause cancer. Monsanto denies the claim.

The plaintiffs cited an email from Monsanto executive William Heydens proposing to ghostwrite parts of one report, saying, “we would be keeping the cost down by us doing the writing” while researchers “would just edit & sign their names so to speak.” In the emails, Heydens wrote that this is how Monsanto had “handled” an earlier paper on glyphosate’s safety.

According to the plaintiffs, Monsanto also hired internet trolls to post positive comments and to defend the bio-tech giant and glyphosate online and in social media forums.

This latest information shows just how far Monsanto is willing to go. Remember that there is also evidence that Monsanto worked closely with a now-retired EPA official, Jess Rowland, who promised Monsanto he would quash an effort by the Department of Health and Human Services Department (HHS) to conduct its own review of glyphosate. He was apparently successful—the HHS review never happened.

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2tya2MV via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2rH9UJo

Lawsuit Revelation

Government relying on Monsanto’s word that Roundup herbicide is safe?

We’ve been following a lawsuit filed by a group of citizens against Monsanto claiming that glyphosate, the active ingredient in the Roundup herbicide, causes non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.

That ongoing case took an interesting turn when recently revealed court documents show the plaintiffs are alleging that Monsanto ghostwrote the scientific reports relied upon by the EPA to determine glyphosate does not cause cancer. Monsanto denies the claim.

The plaintiffs cited an email from Monsanto executive William Heydens proposing to ghostwrite parts of one report, saying, “we would be keeping the cost down by us doing the writing” while researchers “would just edit & sign their names so to speak.” In the emails, Heydens wrote that this is how Monsanto had “handled” an earlier paper on glyphosate’s safety.

According to the plaintiffs, Monsanto also hired internet trolls to post positive comments and to defend the bio-tech giant and glyphosate online and in social media forums.

This latest information shows just how far Monsanto is willing to go. Remember that there is also evidence that Monsanto worked closely with a now-retired EPA official, Jess Rowland, who promised Monsanto he would quash an effort by the Department of Health and Human Services Department (HHS) to conduct its own review of glyphosate. He was apparently successful—the HHS review never happened.



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2tya2MV via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2sYxuFU

Action Alert: Tell Congress to Save CBD Oil!

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2rVudHq via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2rH4YV5

Action Alert: Tell Congress to Save CBD Oil!



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2rVudHq via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2sYBFS4

CBD for Pain Reveals Why Healthcare Such a Mess!

Research and clinical evidence confirms that CBD oil relieves pain [1]. This should be good news! 116m Americans suffer chronic pain [2].

Other approved pain relievers may cause internal bleeding, (e.g. aspirin)[3], cause heart disease (e.g. the now banned Vioxx)[4], kill people (fentanyl, up to 100X more potent than morphine)[5], or lead to both addiction and death (e.g. opioids, killed 33,000 people in the last reported year, as many as from auto accidents [6]). By contrast, CBD oil appears to be effective, safe, and completely non-addictive [7]. It may also help control cancer and other diseases [8].

So why is the FDA trying to shut down information on this lifesaving supplement and, worse, turn it into a highly restricted, expensive prescription drug?

But wait. Is it true that the FDA plans to ban the supplement form? Here is what the Agency itself says in letters sent to CBD producers: “… FDA has concluded that CBD products are excluded from the dietary supplement definition under section 201(ff)(3)(B)(ii) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 321(ff)(3)(B)(ii)]….” [9]

Please note: CBD oil can only be sold as a dietary supplement or a drug. By denying it supplement status, the FDA is warning us that, once a drug version has been approved, the agency will move to yank the supplement from the market. The drug will require doctor visits and, as a monopoly, cost whatever the drug company chooses to charge.

Here are a few facts about CBD oil you need to know. It can be made from marijuana or from hemp [10]. Hemp does not cause a high [11]. It is in fact a super food, good for you in multiple ways [12].

The US government is totally confused about this. One agency, the DEA, says that hemp and hemp extracts are a schedule 1 drug (this means no possible medicinal use) [13]. Another agency, HHS, owns a medical patent on CBD [14]. The FDA is reviewing it as a prescription drug. Meanwhile the federal government does not allow US farmers to grow hemp, but allows foreign producers to sell it to us [15]. And state attorneys general are threatening to sue opioid producers [16].

It gets worse. A drug company has patented CBD oil for epilepsy [17] and has applied to the FDA for orphan drug approval [18]. It’s questionable that CBD has a significant impact on epilepsy [19] (although it can be treated by diet [20]). So why apply for epilepsy/seizures? Because orphan drug approvals cost less. And once the supplement version is banned, this will be the only legal source. Doctors can still prescribe it “off-label” for anything, including pain [21]. The pain market will be enormous. The FDA understands this. All the insiders are winking at each other. Everyone wins except for the public, who will face restricted access and skyrocketing costs.

This is not an isolated case. There are hundreds of similar stories. Natural treatments are often more effective, safer, and far cheaper than synthetic drugs. But the FDA either bars any discussion of them [22] or kicks them out of the healthcare system [23], thereby creating more drug monopolies.

In prior years, this was mostly done by creating synthetic analogues which, unlike natural products, are patentable, but which, being new to our bodies, often turn out to be toxic. As this has become more problematic, the new trend is for drug companies to claim “novel use” patents (as with CBD) or more commonly the FDA will just seize the natural product and turn it into a protected monopoly free from price competition [24].

Science tells us that food is medicine [25]. But the FDA will put you in jail for mentioning any medical benefit from a particular food. For example, the Agency threatened cherry and walnut producers with jail because they had dared to cite some good science about the health benefits of these common super foods [26].

Healthcare costs so much in general because the government keeps creating medical monopolies. We have them for practitioners as well as for medical treatments. For example, we do not allow nurses to use their full training in treating patients [27].

This is why we need a consumer-run healthcare system which could succeed or just run alongside Obamacare. It is the only way to keep healthcare from bankrupting our country.

What can Congress do right now? Remove hemp from the DEA list. Allow our farmers to grow it. Don’t allow the FDA to ban it as a supplement.

 

 

Notes:

1) http://ift.tt/2rGD8bC

2) http://ift.tt/2sZLI9d

3) http://ift.tt/2rGSj4D

4) http://ift.tt/2sZCwBG

5) http://ift.tt/2oQC4zL

6) http://ift.tt/2r4JeBV

7) http://ift.tt/2rGSlcL

8) http://ift.tt/2g3EJmL

9) http://ift.tt/2rGhN24

10  http://ift.tt/2sZYqF3

11) http://ift.tt/2rGzI8O

12) Hemp seeds as super foods: http://ift.tt/2n159Zg and

http://ift.tt/2rGlZyN

13) http://ift.tt/2gBmYcU

14) http://ift.tt/1oqoPjS

15) http://ift.tt/1jDj4NH

16) http://ift.tt/2tvC0YX

17) http://ift.tt/2sZHDSu

18) http://ift.tt/1Sy0Xxx

19) http://ift.tt/2l1gqbH and

http://ift.tt/2rGqMjt and http://ift.tt/2sZNx64

20) The condition reportedly responds to a ketogenic diet http://ift.tt/2rGfPyA . Also see Mercola, Joseph, MD. Fat For Fuel. Carlsbad, CA 2016.

21) http://ift.tt/2kRTs6K

22) http://ift.tt/2a5SbWF

23) http://ift.tt/2bvGU30

24) Ibid.

25) http://ift.tt/2rGzFKa

26) http://ift.tt/2a5SbWF

27) http://ift.tt/2sZWYCj

 

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2rGtFkq via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2sZHuOX

CBD for Pain Reveals Why Healthcare Such a Mess!

Research and clinical evidence confirms that CBD oil relieves pain [1]. This should be good news! 116m Americans suffer chronic pain [2].

Other approved pain relievers may cause internal bleeding, (e.g. aspirin)[3], cause heart disease (e.g. the now banned Vioxx)[4], kill people (fentanyl, up to 100X more potent than morphine)[5], or lead to both addiction and death (e.g. opioids, killed 33,000 people in the last reported year, as many as from auto accidents [6]). By contrast, CBD oil appears to be effective, safe, and completely non-addictive [7]. It may also help control cancer and other diseases [8].

So why is the FDA trying to shut down information on this lifesaving supplement and, worse, turn it into a highly restricted, expensive prescription drug?

But wait. Is it true that the FDA plans to ban the supplement form? Here is what the Agency itself says in letters sent to CBD producers: “… FDA has concluded that CBD products are excluded from the dietary supplement definition under section 201(ff)(3)(B)(ii) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 321(ff)(3)(B)(ii)]….” [9]

Please note: CBD oil can only be sold as a dietary supplement or a drug. By denying it supplement status, the FDA is warning us that, once a drug version has been approved, the agency will move to yank the supplement from the market. The drug will require doctor visits and, as a monopoly, cost whatever the drug company chooses to charge.

Here are a few facts about CBD oil you need to know. It can be made from marijuana or from hemp [10]. Hemp does not cause a high [11]. It is in fact a super food, good for you in multiple ways [12].

The US government is totally confused about this. One agency, the DEA, says that hemp and hemp extracts are a schedule 1 drug (this means no possible medicinal use) [13]. Another agency, HHS, owns a medical patent on CBD [14]. The FDA is reviewing it as a prescription drug. Meanwhile the federal government does not allow US farmers to grow hemp, but allows foreign producers to sell it to us [15]. And state attorneys general are threatening to sue opioid producers [16].

It gets worse. A drug company has patented CBD oil for epilepsy [17] and has applied to the FDA for orphan drug approval [18]. It’s questionable that CBD has a significant impact on epilepsy [19] (although it can be treated by diet [20]). So why apply for epilepsy/seizures? Because orphan drug approvals cost less. And once the supplement version is banned, this will be the only legal source. Doctors can still prescribe it “off-label” for anything, including pain [21]. The pain market will be enormous. The FDA understands this. All the insiders are winking at each other. Everyone wins except for the public, who will face restricted access and skyrocketing costs.

This is not an isolated case. There are hundreds of similar stories. Natural treatments are often more effective, safer, and far cheaper than synthetic drugs. But the FDA either bars any discussion of them [22] or kicks them out of the healthcare system [23], thereby creating more drug monopolies.

In prior years, this was mostly done by creating synthetic analogues which, unlike natural products, are patentable, but which, being new to our bodies, often turn out to be toxic. As this has become more problematic, the new trend is for drug companies to claim “novel use” patents (as with CBD) or more commonly the FDA will just seize the natural product and turn it into a protected monopoly free from price competition [24].

Science tells us that food is medicine [25]. But the FDA will put you in jail for mentioning any medical benefit from a particular food. For example, the Agency threatened cherry and walnut producers with jail because they had dared to cite some good science about the health benefits of these common super foods [26].

Healthcare costs so much in general because the government keeps creating medical monopolies. We have them for practitioners as well as for medical treatments. For example, we do not allow nurses to use their full training in treating patients [27].

This is why we need a consumer-run healthcare system which could succeed or just run alongside Obamacare. It is the only way to keep healthcare from bankrupting our country.

What can Congress do right now? Remove hemp from the DEA list. Allow our farmers to grow it. Don’t allow the FDA to ban it as a supplement.

 

 

Notes:

1) http://ift.tt/2rGD8bC

2) http://ift.tt/2sZLI9d

3) http://ift.tt/2rGSj4D

4) http://ift.tt/2sZCwBG

5) http://ift.tt/2oQC4zL

6) http://ift.tt/2r4JeBV

7) http://ift.tt/2rGSlcL

8) http://ift.tt/2g3EJmL

9) http://ift.tt/2rGhN24

10  http://ift.tt/2sZYqF3

11) http://ift.tt/2rGzI8O

12) Hemp seeds as super foods: http://ift.tt/2n159Zg and

http://ift.tt/2rGlZyN

13) http://ift.tt/2gBmYcU

14) http://ift.tt/1oqoPjS

15) http://ift.tt/1jDj4NH

16) http://ift.tt/2tvC0YX

17) http://ift.tt/2sZHDSu

18) http://ift.tt/1Sy0Xxx

19) http://ift.tt/2l1gqbH and

http://ift.tt/2rGqMjt and http://ift.tt/2sZNx64

20) The condition reportedly responds to a ketogenic diet http://ift.tt/2rGfPyA . Also see Mercola, Joseph, MD. Fat For Fuel. Carlsbad, CA 2016.

21) http://ift.tt/2kRTs6K

22) http://ift.tt/2a5SbWF

23) http://ift.tt/2bvGU30

24) Ibid.

25) http://ift.tt/2rGzFKa

26) http://ift.tt/2a5SbWF

27) http://ift.tt/2sZWYCj

 



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2rGtFkq via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2sV1h1t

Tuesday, June 20, 2017

Tell Congress: Save Natural Medicine

The FDA has been distorting law and trampling on our right to access needed medicine. Now, it’s time for us to fight back! Major Action Alert!

Congressmen Morgan Griffith (R-VA) and Henry Cuellar (R-TX) recently introduced HR 2871, the Preserving Patient Access to Compounded Medications Act of 2017. This is a important first step toward saving many natural, customized medicines from the chopping block.

Without a doubt, this will receive significant opposition from Big Pharma and from the FDA itself making your support crucial for getting this legislation passed.

This is our moment to act. We’ve been telling you for years how the FDA has been waging an all-out war on customized, natural medicines made at specialized pharmacies. FDA actions threaten to wipe these life-saving medications off the map (see here for more background).

The only way to stop this is for lawmakers to step in. Congress has also repeatedly scolded the FDA through language in congressional spending bills for distorting lawmakers’ intent and needlessly limiting patient access to important medications. The agency’s fidelity to Big Pharma is the only explanation we can develop for this lawless behavior.

Beyond codifying congressional intent, the new bill does two important things. It amends section 503A of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to unequivocally allow “office use” of compounded drugs, which allows a doctor to keep a supply of certain medications in his or her office in order to provide immediate treatment to patients who need it.

For example, a patient in extreme pain cannot wait days, get his or her prescription filled and then return to the doctor for an injection. Even if the patient does not require urgent treatment, the delay will greatly increase costs, which seems to be a by-product of everything the FDA does.

The bill also mandates the FDA to accept USP monographs. This is a pivotal issue. In order to be made into a customized medicine, a substance in the past had to meet one of three criteria. It must either:

  1. appear on an FDA pre-approved list (the Bulk Drug list);
  2. have a USP monograph; or
  3. be a component of an approved drug.

Last year the FDA, with no explanation or justification, stated that it would not accept supplement USP monographs. This meant that in order to be used in customized, natural medicines, supplements had to be nominated for the FDA’s pre-approved list. Many supplements were nominated, but, no surprise, the FDA rejected them. Even a supplement, however, like curcumin, with very important medical uses. Behind the scenes, of course, Pharma is trying to turn curcumin or a synthetic analogue in a drug.

This bill doesn’t fix every misguided action of the FDA since the agency began implementing the Drug Quality and Security Act of 2013. Patient access to bioidentical hormones like progesterone and estriol is still threatened, since they’ve been nominated to the Demonstrably Difficult to Compound list. Still, this bill is a major first step forward in saving important natural medications from the FDA’s chopping block, and it needs our support.

Action Alert! Write to your representatives in Congress and urge them to support HR 2871. Please send your message immediately.

Other articles in this week’s Pulse of Natural Health:

1.2 Million Children Poisoned

Even Scarier Than Lyme

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2swdG9S via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2swnpwZ

Tell Congress: Save Natural Medicine

The FDA has been distorting law and trampling on our right to access needed medicine. Now, it’s time for us to fight back! Major Action Alert!

Congressmen Morgan Griffith (R-VA) and Henry Cuellar (R-TX) recently introduced HR 2871, the Preserving Patient Access to Compounded Medications Act of 2017. This is a important first step toward saving many natural, customized medicines from the chopping block.

Without a doubt, this will receive significant opposition from Big Pharma and from the FDA itself making your support crucial for getting this legislation passed.

This is our moment to act. We’ve been telling you for years how the FDA has been waging an all-out war on customized, natural medicines made at specialized pharmacies. FDA actions threaten to wipe these life-saving medications off the map (see here for more background).

The only way to stop this is for lawmakers to step in. Congress has also repeatedly scolded the FDA through language in congressional spending bills for distorting lawmakers’ intent and needlessly limiting patient access to important medications. The agency’s fidelity to Big Pharma is the only explanation we can develop for this lawless behavior.

Beyond codifying congressional intent, the new bill does two important things. It amends section 503A of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to unequivocally allow “office use” of compounded drugs, which allows a doctor to keep a supply of certain medications in his or her office in order to provide immediate treatment to patients who need it.

For example, a patient in extreme pain cannot wait days, get his or her prescription filled and then return to the doctor for an injection. Even if the patient does not require urgent treatment, the delay will greatly increase costs, which seems to be a by-product of everything the FDA does.

The bill also mandates the FDA to accept USP monographs. This is a pivotal issue. In order to be made into a customized medicine, a substance in the past had to meet one of three criteria. It must either:

  1. appear on an FDA pre-approved list (the Bulk Drug list);
  2. have a USP monograph; or
  3. be a component of an approved drug.

Last year the FDA, with no explanation or justification, stated that it would not accept supplement USP monographs. This meant that in order to be used in customized, natural medicines, supplements had to be nominated for the FDA’s pre-approved list. Many supplements were nominated, but, no surprise, the FDA rejected them. Even a supplement, however, like curcumin, with very important medical uses. Behind the scenes, of course, Pharma is trying to turn curcumin or a synthetic analogue in a drug.

This bill doesn’t fix every misguided action of the FDA since the agency began implementing the Drug Quality and Security Act of 2013. Patient access to bioidentical hormones like progesterone and estriol is still threatened, since they’ve been nominated to the Demonstrably Difficult to Compound list. Still, this bill is a major first step forward in saving important natural medications from the FDA’s chopping block, and it needs our support.

Action Alert! Write to your representatives in Congress and urge them to support HR 2871. Please send your message immediately.

Other articles in this week’s Pulse of Natural Health:

1.2 Million Children Poisoned

Even Scarier Than Lyme



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2swdG9S via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2rQYceR

Action Alert: Tell Congress to Save Natural Medicine

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2sOgYbv via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2sLxZT2

Action Alert: Tell Congress to Save Natural Medicine



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2sOgYbv via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2sm1lqq

Friday, June 16, 2017

1.2 Million Children Poisoned

Government lies and lack of profit incentive are both leading to lack of treatment. Action Alert!

A new report published in Pediatrics estimates that the overall number of children with elevated lead levels in the US for the period 1999 to 2010 was 1.2 million—double what the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention previously reported. Even that figure is likely far lower than the reality.

Because testing for lead is not required in the US, lead poisoning is often missed. In eleven states, including Florida, Georgia, Arizona, Washington, and Oregon, more than 80% of children with elevated lead levels were not tested by pediatricians or local health departments. In the remaining 28 states for which data was available, between 40-60% of children with lead poisoning were not tested.

Scientists have determined there is no safe level of lead for children. Even low levels can lower IQ; higher levels can lead to severe neurological damage and the development of conditions like attention deficit and hyperactivity disorders. Additionally, as we’ve reported before, lead exposure is also linked to violent crime.

You’d think that state and federal health officials would be open to therapies that can help people get the lead out of their bodies, but our crony medical system rejects treatments that are not big money makers.

Chelation therapy is the gold standard for removing toxic metals such as lead. Conventional doctors rarely use it, but integrative doctors are well versed in the benefits of chelation therapy for removing lead and other toxins from the body. Predictably, the FDA is hostile toward chelation despite the growing evidence that it is both safe and effective.

Action Alert! Send a message to your state legislature, urging them to look into and address high levels of lead in prisoners and juvenile offenders. Please send your message immediately.

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2sxXYNG via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2ronjGh

1.2 Million Children Poisoned

Government lies and lack of profit incentive are both leading to lack of treatment. Action Alert!

A new report published in Pediatrics estimates that the overall number of children with elevated lead levels in the US for the period 1999 to 2010 was 1.2 million—double what the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention previously reported. Even that figure is likely far lower than the reality.

Because testing for lead is not required in the US, lead poisoning is often missed. In eleven states, including Florida, Georgia, Arizona, Washington, and Oregon, more than 80% of children with elevated lead levels were not tested by pediatricians or local health departments. In the remaining 28 states for which data was available, between 40-60% of children with lead poisoning were not tested.

Scientists have determined there is no safe level of lead for children. Even low levels can lower IQ; higher levels can lead to severe neurological damage and the development of conditions like attention deficit and hyperactivity disorders. Additionally, as we’ve reported before, lead exposure is also linked to violent crime.

You’d think that state and federal health officials would be open to therapies that can help people get the lead out of their bodies, but our crony medical system rejects treatments that are not big money makers.

Chelation therapy is the gold standard for removing toxic metals such as lead. Conventional doctors rarely use it, but integrative doctors are well versed in the benefits of chelation therapy for removing lead and other toxins from the body. Predictably, the FDA is hostile toward chelation despite the growing evidence that it is both safe and effective.

Action Alert! Send a message to your state legislature, urging them to look into and address high levels of lead in prisoners and juvenile offenders. Please send your message immediately.



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2sxXYNG via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2taKBke

Thursday, June 15, 2017

Even Scarier Than Lyme

Another tick borne disease is showing up in increased numbers in certain parts of the US, and people aren’t even being warned.

We are seeing a rise in a tick-borne disease called Powassan, POW for short. Half of those who come in to contact with the virus suffer permanent neurological damage; some patients experience no symptoms; 10% die. There is no treatment for POW, and those infected often require hospitalization, respiratory support, and intravenous fluids.

Scientists think that the same tick that spreads Lyme disease—which has expanded its territory to over half of US counties—has somehow picked up POW from the tick that normally carries it, which is partial to animals in the weasel family. Researchers estimate that about 4% of deer ticks carry POW. By comparison, 30-40% carry Lyme disease.

Also whereas Lyme takes 48 hours to transmit, at the end of a tick bite, POW is transmitted within minutes of the bite.

Public health officials do not have a response to this disease other than to recommend hikers wear long sleeves and pants, using some kind of insect repellant, staying away from high tick areas, and doing thorough tick checks after being outdoors.

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2ruYcWe via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2rzB18k

Even Scarier Than Lyme

Another tick borne disease is showing up in increased numbers in certain parts of the US, and people aren’t even being warned.

We are seeing a rise in a tick-borne disease called Powassan, POW for short. Half of those who come in to contact with the virus suffer permanent neurological damage; some patients experience no symptoms; 10% die. There is no treatment for POW, and those infected often require hospitalization, respiratory support, and intravenous fluids.

Scientists think that the same tick that spreads Lyme disease—which has expanded its territory to over half of US counties—has somehow picked up POW from the tick that normally carries it, which is partial to animals in the weasel family. Researchers estimate that about 4% of deer ticks carry POW. By comparison, 30-40% carry Lyme disease.

Also whereas Lyme takes 48 hours to transmit, at the end of a tick bite, POW is transmitted within minutes of the bite.

Public health officials do not have a response to this disease other than to recommend hikers wear long sleeves and pants, using some kind of insect repellant, staying away from high tick areas, and doing thorough tick checks after being outdoors.



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2ruYcWe via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2rkwEyM

Tuesday, June 13, 2017

Killing Medicine, Killing Us

Ballooning medical bureaucracy does both.

Since the 1970s, the number of physicians entering the workforce has remained relatively constant. The number of administrators (who are handsomely paid) has risen almost 3,000%. This is not helping patients.

Doctors and their private practices are increasingly being eaten up by hospitals. In fact, the number of physicians employed by hospitals grew by more than a third between 2000 and 2010. There are a number of factors behind this shift, but, like most shifts in the healthcare industry, it all comes down to money, not care.

Medicare pays hospitals and hospital owned practices more for the same service than private practices, as much as 70% more. Employing doctors also allows hospitals to more easily funnel patients into their other facilities and services. Having doctors on staff also puts hospitals in a better position to negotiate with insurers.

As employees of hospitals, doctors and the medical decisions they make increasingly work at the whim of hospital administrators, whose primary aim is often not patient care but profitability. Estimates say that 80% of healthcare costs derive from decisions that doctors make, such as what medicines to prescribe and what procedures to recommend. There is a strong financial incentive for government, hospitals, and insurance companies to restrict the ability of physicians to make independent decisions.

One method being used by administrators to seize control from doctors is making healthcare incomprehensible to physicians through arcane coding and billing systems and complex information technology. Studies estimate that doctors spend just 12% of their day with patients; the rest is spent processing forms, dealing with electronic medical records, and other administrative duties. The unstated goal, according to an article by Dr. Richard Gunderman, is to train physicians to understand that fealty to the hospital is the center of their professional life, not the doctor-patient relationship.

All of this makes life for doctors working at hospitals tedious, frustrating, and grim. Recent surveys show eight out of ten doctors are “somewhat pessimistic or very pessimistic about the future of medicine.” Doctors today are more likely than any other professional group to commit suicide. Doctors, after years of expensive and extensive education and training, now describe themselves as “technicians on an assembly line” and “worker bees in the factory of the administrative overlords.” Independent judgement is further reduced by the threat of lawsuit, which also leads to many unnecessary tests and referrals to specialists.

Is it possible to reform this dysfunctional system? Yes, it is. All that is needed is to legalize patient driven medicine, as recommended in the next article in this week’s Pulse.

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2swOPFt via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2rmGwMM