Tuesday, December 19, 2017

Test Post Three

Aliquam dignissim nulla nec magna suscipit viverra. Donec euismod venenatis maximus. Orci varius natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus. Aliquam erat volutpat. Etiam nec placerat magna. Morbi id laoreet erat. Quisque sapien mauris, pellentesque sed magna at, sollicitudin rhoncus tellus.

Aliquam at neque sodales, efficitur purus eget, suscipit quam. Duis ullamcorper ante sed pulvinar tincidunt. Cras imperdiet tincidunt nunc, eu ultrices lorem tincidunt eu. Suspendisse dignissim, nulla sodales vehicula suscipit, massa dui porta nibh, eu convallis turpis tellus sit amet sapien. Phasellus vitae eros lorem. Aenean vitae purus bibendum, bibendum mauris in, efficitur felis. Interdum et malesuada fames ac ante ipsum primis in faucibus. Morbi in posuere mi. Nullam molestie cursus arcu in consectetur.

Nulla egestas aliquam ipsum, id efficitur tellus pulvinar at. Morbi hendrerit ante neque, nec accumsan ex molestie ut. Fusce placerat libero ac consequat porttitor. Phasellus consequat arcu eu ligula vestibulum, eget suscipit risus ullamcorper. Cras sed dapibus urna. Maecenas consectetur nibh eget dui ultrices molestie. Aliquam mattis et nunc et efficitur. Sed et porta purus. Nunc risus erat, vestibulum quis convallis quis, dignissim at enim.

Mauris vitae diam ut orci hendrerit cursus accumsan vitae metus. Nam at nibh eget est efficitur pharetra non quis nisi. Donec efficitur augue sed elit auctor volutpat. Quisque commodo sem non eros pharetra, vel vehicula lectus rutrum. Integer placerat lorem a risus suscipit ornare. Suspendisse suscipit, ante in tempor sodales, tortor lorem ornare sem, vitae porta nisl mi vulputate quam. Suspendisse vestibulum, massa id efficitur tincidunt, elit justo porttitor ante, suscipit mattis enim odio id nisl. Etiam dui ligula, efficitur sit amet diam in, dapibus sodales arcu. Donec ipsum diam, auctor eget elit quis, pretium blandit turpis. Quisque auctor metus ac sem aliquam, nec elementum ipsum semper. In placerat enim at hendrerit consequat. Sed magna nunc, finibus eu leo eget, dignissim semper velit.

Vestibulum mi metus, eleifend in tellus porta, porta posuere justo. Duis pharetra mollis lobortis. Praesent elementum sagittis pharetra. Phasellus porta, magna commodo malesuada tristique, dui libero laoreet massa, ac interdum elit purus sit amet libero. Vestibulum non lobortis lorem. Vestibulum dignissim commodo rutrum. Proin eget urna tellus. Aliquam placerat tellus lectus, eget dignissim massa feugiat et. Nulla posuere augue vitae eros elementum tincidunt. Morbi non ex ac metus tristique tincidunt. In eu elit iaculis, tempus neque in, rhoncus tellus. Aliquam non felis eget tellus placerat finibus eget tempor metus. Pellentesque sed nisi sit amet lacus bibendum pellentesque quis eget nisi. Etiam elit diam, porttitor ac sem eu, iaculis pharetra orci. Phasellus quam diam, lobortis non volutpat quis, ullamcorper sit amet sem. Vivamus feugiat ac est at venenatis.

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2D8T4tp via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2B0z8qN

Test Post Two

Nullam ut facilisis turpis. Nullam malesuada nulla urna, id semper libero congue ut. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Donec vitae fermentum odio. Suspendisse ultrices, mauris sagittis ornare posuere, purus velit ornare lectus, sit amet tristique purus elit non lacus. Nulla dui dolor, vestibulum ut ipsum sit amet, gravida vulputate ipsum. Sed lobortis tempus urna vitae dictum. Sed arcu nisi, faucibus rutrum posuere nec, porta non mi. Sed aliquet bibendum erat, et sodales libero volutpat sed. Etiam bibendum felis congue pulvinar scelerisque. Curabitur et lorem ultricies leo vulputate laoreet tempor ut nisl.

Vivamus scelerisque tristique ornare. Sed nec sapien vitae nunc ultrices dignissim. Nullam efficitur nisi et leo vulputate ullamcorper. Nullam eget elit auctor, suscipit mauris in, aliquam dui. Curabitur semper dui non mi fringilla, vel tristique arcu aliquam. Morbi vel accumsan erat. Pellentesque pellentesque pharetra libero vitae mollis. Vestibulum semper arcu a libero scelerisque vehicula. Nam scelerisque porttitor neque, malesuada auctor ante dignissim vitae. Fusce eu libero arcu. Mauris placerat augue posuere imperdiet volutpat.

Suspendisse consequat nibh velit, ac dapibus nisl cursus nec. Cras tellus risus, egestas quis neque sed, efficitur bibendum tortor. Vivamus mauris nulla, elementum quis pharetra id, venenatis at sapien. Aliquam erat volutpat. Vestibulum orci felis, elementum id tincidunt id, dignissim vel dui. Cras eleifend euismod aliquam. Aliquam erat volutpat. Sed nisl lorem, vulputate sed eros et, ornare suscipit leo. Donec porttitor lacus sed lobortis ornare.

Proin fringilla convallis arcu, sed molestie justo scelerisque non. Praesent nec nunc a erat sollicitudin iaculis. Nullam ac dictum diam, sit amet auctor nulla. Nullam blandit ex ut cursus bibendum. Integer viverra placerat tortor in pellentesque. Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos himenaeos. Suspendisse potenti. Sed suscipit venenatis ex, eu tincidunt felis ultrices quis. Proin accumsan fringilla tempus. Nam blandit aliquet commodo. Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia Curae; Nunc sed vestibulum justo, et condimentum risus. Fusce quis mi in ex pulvinar scelerisque.

Integer finibus faucibus quam sed consectetur. Praesent ullamcorper placerat convallis. Proin interdum tellus vel mi interdum imperdiet. Donec diam diam, pharetra at interdum eu, condimentum vulputate metus. Praesent eu rhoncus augue. Vestibulum fermentum tellus sed erat dignissim ullamcorper. Integer vitae eros vel tortor pharetra tempus. Quisque mattis, dui a rhoncus accumsan, diam dolor ultrices elit, quis mattis mauris augue non massa. Curabitur aliquam, ipsum et aliquam ultricies, purus ipsum sollicitudin justo, et posuere ante nunc sed sapien. Sed pretium, libero sit amet blandit ultricies, nunc libero rutrum tellus, non gravida justo sapien eu quam. Nunc tristique pulvinar metus, sed tristique est consequat sit amet. Fusce ut mattis urna, eu mollis metus.

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2oOOH3t via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2B1lCn4

Test Post

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed vel volutpat ligula. Sed et placerat justo, non dictum nisi. Nullam porta est at risus semper viverra ut a lectus. Fusce dui neque, elementum a fringilla in, luctus vitae nisl. In ligula neque, scelerisque at malesuada ac, ullamcorper quis tortor. Cras bibendum cursus nisi vitae ultricies. Vestibulum ultricies mauris eu sodales tempor. Nam accumsan sed massa in molestie. Aenean sed neque ex. Fusce cursus accumsan efficitur.

In mollis massa ac ligula viverra finibus. Phasellus tempus faucibus tincidunt. Orci varius natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus. Nullam vel molestie velit. Mauris eget nulla eu libero dapibus faucibus. Donec sagittis consectetur eleifend. Mauris placerat augue ac erat dapibus feugiat.

Donec scelerisque fermentum iaculis. Donec interdum augue in mollis vehicula. Donec et pellentesque tellus. Donec odio dui, laoreet at dignissim sit amet, porta a turpis. Integer et ante felis. Nunc id risus luctus, fringilla sem non, elementum sapien. Nulla facilisi. Vestibulum at tempor mi. Proin sagittis, ligula quis maximus imperdiet, odio est dictum nulla, eget posuere leo turpis sed lectus. Sed viverra tristique volutpat. Pellentesque rutrum eleifend nulla, eu tempus eros placerat id. Curabitur nisl nisi, efficitur ac lacinia sed, egestas nec mauris. Vivamus id nibh nec orci congue imperdiet nec vel risus. Aliquam dictum scelerisque mollis. Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia Curae;

Donec lacinia libero ipsum, non aliquam neque rutrum et. Nulla finibus nulla et magna cursus, sit amet malesuada libero imperdiet. Morbi sit amet dignissim nunc. Integer ornare turpis ante, fringilla imperdiet orci mattis ut. Maecenas id pulvinar dolor. Donec interdum posuere gravida. Aenean iaculis, mi et accumsan sollicitudin, arcu tellus luctus lacus, ut dictum leo enim sit amet dui. Donec auctor sapien non nisi blandit, a finibus massa maximus. Proin ac quam id lorem semper ornare sed et lorem. Pellentesque eget est ut orci venenatis vestibulum in vel sem. Proin ac leo elit. In id ullamcorper libero. Etiam sollicitudin, purus a viverra convallis, metus enim imperdiet justo, quis mattis lacus lacus vitae metus. Sed quis sodales quam, in sollicitudin massa.

Suspendisse potenti. Integer eu velit dolor. Curabitur vitae dictum diam. Curabitur ante urna, molestie vitae placerat id, cursus eget orci. Aenean rutrum dictum diam, in viverra diam vulputate nec. Mauris nec nisi massa. Pellentesque ac sapien eget libero imperdiet luctus. Pellentesque mauris augue, mattis ut varius non, imperdiet vel tortor. Praesent aliquet urna nisi, vel maximus ex suscipit eu. Pellentesque vitae finibus nunc. Integer ac dignissim libero. Cras aliquam lorem vitae metus interdum, vel tristique neque mattis. Cras eget dolor libero.

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/1ZaCVq0 via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2B1DKgH

Test Post Three

Aliquam dignissim nulla nec magna suscipit viverra. Donec euismod venenatis maximus. Orci varius natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus. Aliquam erat volutpat. Etiam nec placerat magna. Morbi id laoreet erat. Quisque sapien mauris, pellentesque sed magna at, sollicitudin rhoncus tellus.

Aliquam at neque sodales, efficitur purus eget, suscipit quam. Duis ullamcorper ante sed pulvinar tincidunt. Cras imperdiet tincidunt nunc, eu ultrices lorem tincidunt eu. Suspendisse dignissim, nulla sodales vehicula suscipit, massa dui porta nibh, eu convallis turpis tellus sit amet sapien. Phasellus vitae eros lorem. Aenean vitae purus bibendum, bibendum mauris in, efficitur felis. Interdum et malesuada fames ac ante ipsum primis in faucibus. Morbi in posuere mi. Nullam molestie cursus arcu in consectetur.

Nulla egestas aliquam ipsum, id efficitur tellus pulvinar at. Morbi hendrerit ante neque, nec accumsan ex molestie ut. Fusce placerat libero ac consequat porttitor. Phasellus consequat arcu eu ligula vestibulum, eget suscipit risus ullamcorper. Cras sed dapibus urna. Maecenas consectetur nibh eget dui ultrices molestie. Aliquam mattis et nunc et efficitur. Sed et porta purus. Nunc risus erat, vestibulum quis convallis quis, dignissim at enim.

Mauris vitae diam ut orci hendrerit cursus accumsan vitae metus. Nam at nibh eget est efficitur pharetra non quis nisi. Donec efficitur augue sed elit auctor volutpat. Quisque commodo sem non eros pharetra, vel vehicula lectus rutrum. Integer placerat lorem a risus suscipit ornare. Suspendisse suscipit, ante in tempor sodales, tortor lorem ornare sem, vitae porta nisl mi vulputate quam. Suspendisse vestibulum, massa id efficitur tincidunt, elit justo porttitor ante, suscipit mattis enim odio id nisl. Etiam dui ligula, efficitur sit amet diam in, dapibus sodales arcu. Donec ipsum diam, auctor eget elit quis, pretium blandit turpis. Quisque auctor metus ac sem aliquam, nec elementum ipsum semper. In placerat enim at hendrerit consequat. Sed magna nunc, finibus eu leo eget, dignissim semper velit.

Vestibulum mi metus, eleifend in tellus porta, porta posuere justo. Duis pharetra mollis lobortis. Praesent elementum sagittis pharetra. Phasellus porta, magna commodo malesuada tristique, dui libero laoreet massa, ac interdum elit purus sit amet libero. Vestibulum non lobortis lorem. Vestibulum dignissim commodo rutrum. Proin eget urna tellus. Aliquam placerat tellus lectus, eget dignissim massa feugiat et. Nulla posuere augue vitae eros elementum tincidunt. Morbi non ex ac metus tristique tincidunt. In eu elit iaculis, tempus neque in, rhoncus tellus. Aliquam non felis eget tellus placerat finibus eget tempor metus. Pellentesque sed nisi sit amet lacus bibendum pellentesque quis eget nisi. Etiam elit diam, porttitor ac sem eu, iaculis pharetra orci. Phasellus quam diam, lobortis non volutpat quis, ullamcorper sit amet sem. Vivamus feugiat ac est at venenatis.



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2D8T4tp via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2BNh1Z2

Test Post Two

Nullam ut facilisis turpis. Nullam malesuada nulla urna, id semper libero congue ut. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Donec vitae fermentum odio. Suspendisse ultrices, mauris sagittis ornare posuere, purus velit ornare lectus, sit amet tristique purus elit non lacus. Nulla dui dolor, vestibulum ut ipsum sit amet, gravida vulputate ipsum. Sed lobortis tempus urna vitae dictum. Sed arcu nisi, faucibus rutrum posuere nec, porta non mi. Sed aliquet bibendum erat, et sodales libero volutpat sed. Etiam bibendum felis congue pulvinar scelerisque. Curabitur et lorem ultricies leo vulputate laoreet tempor ut nisl.

Vivamus scelerisque tristique ornare. Sed nec sapien vitae nunc ultrices dignissim. Nullam efficitur nisi et leo vulputate ullamcorper. Nullam eget elit auctor, suscipit mauris in, aliquam dui. Curabitur semper dui non mi fringilla, vel tristique arcu aliquam. Morbi vel accumsan erat. Pellentesque pellentesque pharetra libero vitae mollis. Vestibulum semper arcu a libero scelerisque vehicula. Nam scelerisque porttitor neque, malesuada auctor ante dignissim vitae. Fusce eu libero arcu. Mauris placerat augue posuere imperdiet volutpat.

Suspendisse consequat nibh velit, ac dapibus nisl cursus nec. Cras tellus risus, egestas quis neque sed, efficitur bibendum tortor. Vivamus mauris nulla, elementum quis pharetra id, venenatis at sapien. Aliquam erat volutpat. Vestibulum orci felis, elementum id tincidunt id, dignissim vel dui. Cras eleifend euismod aliquam. Aliquam erat volutpat. Sed nisl lorem, vulputate sed eros et, ornare suscipit leo. Donec porttitor lacus sed lobortis ornare.

Proin fringilla convallis arcu, sed molestie justo scelerisque non. Praesent nec nunc a erat sollicitudin iaculis. Nullam ac dictum diam, sit amet auctor nulla. Nullam blandit ex ut cursus bibendum. Integer viverra placerat tortor in pellentesque. Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos himenaeos. Suspendisse potenti. Sed suscipit venenatis ex, eu tincidunt felis ultrices quis. Proin accumsan fringilla tempus. Nam blandit aliquet commodo. Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia Curae; Nunc sed vestibulum justo, et condimentum risus. Fusce quis mi in ex pulvinar scelerisque.

Integer finibus faucibus quam sed consectetur. Praesent ullamcorper placerat convallis. Proin interdum tellus vel mi interdum imperdiet. Donec diam diam, pharetra at interdum eu, condimentum vulputate metus. Praesent eu rhoncus augue. Vestibulum fermentum tellus sed erat dignissim ullamcorper. Integer vitae eros vel tortor pharetra tempus. Quisque mattis, dui a rhoncus accumsan, diam dolor ultrices elit, quis mattis mauris augue non massa. Curabitur aliquam, ipsum et aliquam ultricies, purus ipsum sollicitudin justo, et posuere ante nunc sed sapien. Sed pretium, libero sit amet blandit ultricies, nunc libero rutrum tellus, non gravida justo sapien eu quam. Nunc tristique pulvinar metus, sed tristique est consequat sit amet. Fusce ut mattis urna, eu mollis metus.



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2oOOH3t via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2B0Vb0A

Test Post

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed vel volutpat ligula. Sed et placerat justo, non dictum nisi. Nullam porta est at risus semper viverra ut a lectus. Fusce dui neque, elementum a fringilla in, luctus vitae nisl. In ligula neque, scelerisque at malesuada ac, ullamcorper quis tortor. Cras bibendum cursus nisi vitae ultricies. Vestibulum ultricies mauris eu sodales tempor. Nam accumsan sed massa in molestie. Aenean sed neque ex. Fusce cursus accumsan efficitur.

In mollis massa ac ligula viverra finibus. Phasellus tempus faucibus tincidunt. Orci varius natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus. Nullam vel molestie velit. Mauris eget nulla eu libero dapibus faucibus. Donec sagittis consectetur eleifend. Mauris placerat augue ac erat dapibus feugiat.

Donec scelerisque fermentum iaculis. Donec interdum augue in mollis vehicula. Donec et pellentesque tellus. Donec odio dui, laoreet at dignissim sit amet, porta a turpis. Integer et ante felis. Nunc id risus luctus, fringilla sem non, elementum sapien. Nulla facilisi. Vestibulum at tempor mi. Proin sagittis, ligula quis maximus imperdiet, odio est dictum nulla, eget posuere leo turpis sed lectus. Sed viverra tristique volutpat. Pellentesque rutrum eleifend nulla, eu tempus eros placerat id. Curabitur nisl nisi, efficitur ac lacinia sed, egestas nec mauris. Vivamus id nibh nec orci congue imperdiet nec vel risus. Aliquam dictum scelerisque mollis. Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia Curae;

Donec lacinia libero ipsum, non aliquam neque rutrum et. Nulla finibus nulla et magna cursus, sit amet malesuada libero imperdiet. Morbi sit amet dignissim nunc. Integer ornare turpis ante, fringilla imperdiet orci mattis ut. Maecenas id pulvinar dolor. Donec interdum posuere gravida. Aenean iaculis, mi et accumsan sollicitudin, arcu tellus luctus lacus, ut dictum leo enim sit amet dui. Donec auctor sapien non nisi blandit, a finibus massa maximus. Proin ac quam id lorem semper ornare sed et lorem. Pellentesque eget est ut orci venenatis vestibulum in vel sem. Proin ac leo elit. In id ullamcorper libero. Etiam sollicitudin, purus a viverra convallis, metus enim imperdiet justo, quis mattis lacus lacus vitae metus. Sed quis sodales quam, in sollicitudin massa.

Suspendisse potenti. Integer eu velit dolor. Curabitur vitae dictum diam. Curabitur ante urna, molestie vitae placerat id, cursus eget orci. Aenean rutrum dictum diam, in viverra diam vulputate nec. Mauris nec nisi massa. Pellentesque ac sapien eget libero imperdiet luctus. Pellentesque mauris augue, mattis ut varius non, imperdiet vel tortor. Praesent aliquet urna nisi, vel maximus ex suscipit eu. Pellentesque vitae finibus nunc. Integer ac dignissim libero. Cras aliquam lorem vitae metus interdum, vel tristique neque mattis. Cras eget dolor libero.



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/1ZaCVq0 via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2BNgWEI

Monday, December 18, 2017

Customized Resveratrol Also to Be Banned

Another update on the FDA’s war on natural medicine. Action Alert!

Recently we told you about the Nov. 20-21 meeting of the FDA’s Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee (PCAC), in which the committee would recommend whether several natural medicines could continue to be used by pharmacies to make customized natural medicines for patients.

The fate of several crucial medicines was decided, including resveratrol, astralagus, and pregnenolone. Resveratrol and astralagus were rejected by PCAC, but the committee voted, against the FDA’s recommendation, to include pregnenolone in the list of medicines that can be compounded. Of course, PCAC only makes recommendations, and when the FDA finalizes its list, it may well reject pregnenolone too, so we must remain vigilant.

The goal of this process – as has been clear from the start – is to hamstring and eventually drive out of business traditional compounding pharmacies by eliminating the types of medicines they can produce. The FDA wants traditional pharmacies to register as “outsourcing facilities,” since the agency has tight control over what they can produce and can prevent production of anything deemed to compete with regular drugs. Few traditional pharmacies have chosen to convert to this new kind of facility because they know it would end their independence.

Action Alert! Write to the FDA, telling the agency NOT to adopt PCAC’s recommendation to ban resveratrol from compounding. Please send your message immediately.

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2B9L6mq via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2kfwBCM

Protect Natural Estriol!

Many millions of women depend on it. Action Alert!

In 2008, the FDA – likely acting upon a petition it received from Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturer of Premarin (an estrogen drug made from pregnant horse mares’ urine) – went after bioidentical hormones, particularly estriol. Thanks to ANH members and the wider natural health community, the FDA backed off. Now, they see an opportunity to remove estriol and other hormones by other means and we must once again mobilize to stop them.

The latest attack has been launched by nominating bioidentical hormones to the Difficult to Compound List. The track record thus far suggests that nomination is virtually identical to removal. Given that customized, bioidentical hormones are safe, effective, and not difficult to compound,  why is this happening? Unfortunately, the FDA appears to be working at the behest of drug manufacturers whose products compete with these compounded hormones. Why else would consumer access to safe, efficacious products be denied?

The FDA’s Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee (PCAC) makes recommendations to the agency concerning which ingredients should be allowed to be compounded. Since being set up, it has been diligently eliminating almost every natural medicine that it reviews.

Now, crucial bioidentical hormones, including progesterone, progesterone combined with estradiol, and estriol, are about to be eliminated through this process. Once these hormones, along with related delivery systems such as time-release, have been placed on the FDA’s “Difficult to Compound List,” they cannot be made at any compounding pharmacy.

The plain fact is that these hormones are not difficult to compound by any stretch of the imagination. Nominators argue, for instance, that bioidentical hormones are “difficult to compound” in part because they aren’t water soluble. This is correct—which is why pharmacies typically employ creams to deliver bioidentical hormones. (By contrast, many FDA-approved hormone drugs come in pill form, which may not be absorbed into the body.) Nominators say that the particle size of bioidentical hormones cannot be guaranteed—yet raw materials purchased by pharmacies are guaranteed by their manufacturer to correspond to a particular particle size. In short, the arguments that try to prove hormones are “difficult to compound” are false.

Another argument we’ve heard coming out of the FDA and PCAC is that, if there are commercially available drugs on the market, there’s no need for a substance to be compounded. Back in 2008, there were no bioidentical drugs in this class. Now that there are, the FDA apparently wants to ensure that they have a monopoly.

Quite apart from the undesirability of government protected monopolies, which lead to spiraling prices, this argument betrays a complete lack of understanding of compounding. The whole idea of pharmacies making individualized medicines is so that patients with special needs—those with allergies or other sensitivities, those who can’t swallow pills, those who need different dosage strengths or transmission forms ( eg. cream rather than tablet) than the market version of a drug, etc.—can get the medicine they require. Drug companies often prefer tablets because they are easier to produce. Does this mean that women should be denied access to a cream?

The FDA’s hostility to customized bioidentical hormones has nothing to do with safety. We noted at the time that the FDA acknowledged it hadn’t received any adverse events pertaining to estriol, which shouldn’t come as any surprise: its safety profile is exceptional. Not only that: it can reduce the risk of taking other hormones and can reduce the risk of inflammation and cancer.

Actually, there is ample clinical evidence to suggest that bioidentical hormones are safer than the alternatives. A review of the literature came to the following conclusion: “Physiological data and clinical outcomes demonstrate that bioidentical hormones are associated with lower risks, including the risk of breast cancer and cardiovascular disease, and are more efficacious than their synthetic and animal-derived counterparts.”

Other researchers have reached similar conclusions:

Concerning cardiovascular disease, studies by the Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions Group (PEPI) and Gerhard et al demonstrated that natural progesterone does not negatively impact cardiovascular disease progression, unlike synthetic progestins… From the available data, BHRT may prove to be cardioprotective and not increase the risk for breast cancer [emphasis added].

ANH-USA is putting together a major public campaign to demonstrate to the FDA   that millions of women rely on bioidentical hormones to stay healthy and will deeply care about what happens here. We are also taking this issue to Capitol Hill, educating members of Congress about the FDA’s push to get customized bioidentical hormones off the market in order to create a monopoly for the drug industry.

The FDA and PCAC need to hear from patients and practitioners that we will not stand for this: it’s bad medicine and bad public policy. Women have a right to choose, with advice of their doctor, the medicines that best fit their needs. Take action below, but also tell us your stories. How have compounded bioidentical hormones helped you or someone you love? How has estriol helped you? Putting a human face on an issue makes it more difficult for the FDA to continue prosecuting its War on Women’s Health.

Action Alert! Write to Congress, PCAC, and the FDA, telling them that we need access to compounded bioidentical hormones like estriol. Also, if you have a personal story you want to share, send it to membership@anh-usa.org. Your stories will help us demonstrate to policy-makers that patients will not tolerate the FDA removing access to protect the pharmaceutical industry.

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2yUgShf via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2kfwBmg

Customized Resveratrol Also to Be Banned

Another update on the FDA’s war on natural medicine. Action Alert!

Recently we told you about the Nov. 20-21 meeting of the FDA’s Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee (PCAC), in which the committee would recommend whether several natural medicines could continue to be used by pharmacies to make customized natural medicines for patients.

The fate of several crucial medicines was decided, including resveratrol, astralagus, and pregnenolone. Resveratrol and astralagus were rejected by PCAC, but the committee voted, against the FDA’s recommendation, to include pregnenolone in the list of medicines that can be compounded. Of course, PCAC only makes recommendations, and when the FDA finalizes its list, it may well reject pregnenolone too, so we must remain vigilant.

The goal of this process – as has been clear from the start – is to hamstring and eventually drive out of business traditional compounding pharmacies by eliminating the types of medicines they can produce. The FDA wants traditional pharmacies to register as “outsourcing facilities,” since the agency has tight control over what they can produce and can prevent production of anything deemed to compete with regular drugs. Few traditional pharmacies have chosen to convert to this new kind of facility because they know it would end their independence.

Action Alert! Write to the FDA, telling the agency NOT to adopt PCAC’s recommendation to ban resveratrol from compounding. Please send your message immediately.



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2B9L6mq via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2B9zBeG

Protect Natural Estriol!

Many millions of women depend on it. Action Alert!

In 2008, the FDA – likely acting upon a petition it received from Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturer of Premarin (an estrogen drug made from pregnant horse mares’ urine) – went after bioidentical hormones, particularly estriol. Thanks to ANH members and the wider natural health community, the FDA backed off. Now, they see an opportunity to remove estriol and other hormones by other means and we must once again mobilize to stop them.

The latest attack has been launched by nominating bioidentical hormones to the Difficult to Compound List. The track record thus far suggests that nomination is virtually identical to removal. Given that customized, bioidentical hormones are safe, effective, and not difficult to compound,  why is this happening? Unfortunately, the FDA appears to be working at the behest of drug manufacturers whose products compete with these compounded hormones. Why else would consumer access to safe, efficacious products be denied?

The FDA’s Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee (PCAC) makes recommendations to the agency concerning which ingredients should be allowed to be compounded. Since being set up, it has been diligently eliminating almost every natural medicine that it reviews.

Now, crucial bioidentical hormones, including progesterone, progesterone combined with estradiol, and estriol, are about to be eliminated through this process. Once these hormones, along with related delivery systems such as time-release, have been placed on the FDA’s “Difficult to Compound List,” they cannot be made at any compounding pharmacy.

The plain fact is that these hormones are not difficult to compound by any stretch of the imagination. Nominators argue, for instance, that bioidentical hormones are “difficult to compound” in part because they aren’t water soluble. This is correct—which is why pharmacies typically employ creams to deliver bioidentical hormones. (By contrast, many FDA-approved hormone drugs come in pill form, which may not be absorbed into the body.) Nominators say that the particle size of bioidentical hormones cannot be guaranteed—yet raw materials purchased by pharmacies are guaranteed by their manufacturer to correspond to a particular particle size. In short, the arguments that try to prove hormones are “difficult to compound” are false.

Another argument we’ve heard coming out of the FDA and PCAC is that, if there are commercially available drugs on the market, there’s no need for a substance to be compounded. Back in 2008, there were no bioidentical drugs in this class. Now that there are, the FDA apparently wants to ensure that they have a monopoly.

Quite apart from the undesirability of government protected monopolies, which lead to spiraling prices, this argument betrays a complete lack of understanding of compounding. The whole idea of pharmacies making individualized medicines is so that patients with special needs—those with allergies or other sensitivities, those who can’t swallow pills, those who need different dosage strengths or transmission forms ( eg. cream rather than tablet) than the market version of a drug, etc.—can get the medicine they require. Drug companies often prefer tablets because they are easier to produce. Does this mean that women should be denied access to a cream?

The FDA’s hostility to customized bioidentical hormones has nothing to do with safety. We noted at the time that the FDA acknowledged it hadn’t received any adverse events pertaining to estriol, which shouldn’t come as any surprise: its safety profile is exceptional. Not only that: it can reduce the risk of taking other hormones and can reduce the risk of inflammation and cancer.

Actually, there is ample clinical evidence to suggest that bioidentical hormones are safer than the alternatives. A review of the literature came to the following conclusion: “Physiological data and clinical outcomes demonstrate that bioidentical hormones are associated with lower risks, including the risk of breast cancer and cardiovascular disease, and are more efficacious than their synthetic and animal-derived counterparts.”

Other researchers have reached similar conclusions:

Concerning cardiovascular disease, studies by the Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions Group (PEPI) and Gerhard et al demonstrated that natural progesterone does not negatively impact cardiovascular disease progression, unlike synthetic progestins… From the available data, BHRT may prove to be cardioprotective and not increase the risk for breast cancer [emphasis added].

ANH-USA is putting together a major public campaign to demonstrate to the FDA   that millions of women rely on bioidentical hormones to stay healthy and will deeply care about what happens here. We are also taking this issue to Capitol Hill, educating members of Congress about the FDA’s push to get customized bioidentical hormones off the market in order to create a monopoly for the drug industry.

The FDA and PCAC need to hear from patients and practitioners that we will not stand for this: it’s bad medicine and bad public policy. Women have a right to choose, with advice of their doctor, the medicines that best fit their needs. Take action below, but also tell us your stories. How have compounded bioidentical hormones helped you or someone you love? How has estriol helped you? Putting a human face on an issue makes it more difficult for the FDA to continue prosecuting its War on Women’s Health.

Action Alert! Write to Congress, PCAC, and the FDA, telling them that we need access to compounded bioidentical hormones like estriol. Also, if you have a personal story you want to share, send it to membership@anh-usa.org. Your stories will help us demonstrate to policy-makers that patients will not tolerate the FDA removing access to protect the pharmaceutical industry.



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2yUgShf via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2yUc1MR

Friday, December 15, 2017

Fish Oil Import Ban: Update

The International Trade Commission (ITC) refused to hear the case; Amarin appeals.

From Nutraingredients:

Amarin Pharmaceuticals Inc. has appealed the decision by the US International Trade Commission not to hear its case in which it had sought to prevent the import of some omega-3 dietary supplements. The company also filed a technical writ to try to force ITC action.

Comment: We’re glad the ITC threw out the case, and not surprised that Amarin is appealing. Check out our previous piece for the background. We pointed out that it would be outrageous to ban fish oil – one of the most anti-inflammatory of foods – with inflammation linked to so many illnesses, with so many people in pain, and with a prescription drug crisis ravaging the nation. The courts must continue to block the creation of a monopoly in the fish oil market.

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2oeOSVj via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2CgQ8JQ

Fish Oil Import Ban: Update

The International Trade Commission (ITC) refused to hear the case; Amarin appeals.

From Nutraingredients:

Amarin Pharmaceuticals Inc. has appealed the decision by the US International Trade Commission not to hear its case in which it had sought to prevent the import of some omega-3 dietary supplements. The company also filed a technical writ to try to force ITC action.

Comment: We’re glad the ITC threw out the case, and not surprised that Amarin is appealing. Check out our previous piece for the background. We pointed out that it would be outrageous to ban fish oil – one of the most anti-inflammatory of foods – with inflammation linked to so many illnesses, with so many people in pain, and with a prescription drug crisis ravaging the nation. The courts must continue to block the creation of a monopoly in the fish oil market.



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2oeOSVj via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2jXBDUw

Thursday, December 14, 2017

By ICIM Member Valeska Wells DO: What’s the big FAT deal??

Ever notice how there are certain things in life that always come back in style? Whether it’s in the fashion world, architecture, old-fashioned films or cars… some classics always make their way back into the spotlight a few generations later. Just hang on to those bellbottoms a little longer- you’ll see! Well, I’m here to talk about one such classic of the nutrition world that was thought to be “out of style” (not to everyone) for a while, but now is back in the spotlight. A diet essential that we now know should never have been removed in the first place… dietary fat. That’s right- fat is back, baby! and we will all be better off for it!

Every five years the USDA and Department of Health and Human Services release the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. These established guidelines influence our food supply in numerous ways including school lunches, military food programs and recipes used in restaurants- it’s safe to say that they undoubtedly influence what you and your family eat on a regular basis. Thankfully, one major topic in this year’s revision was the role of dietary fat.

Since the late 1970’s, the Dietary Guidelines have recommended no more than 30% of calories to come from fat. This included all fats (not just saturated) because fat contains more calories (9) per gram than carbohydrates and protein (4), thus the proposal that low-fat diets would help prevent obesity. Seems simple enough, right? Well, if only nutrition were so cut and dry.

Soon enough low-fat foods made their way into every aisle of the grocery store and countless kitchens around the country. However, since this low-fat craze rates of Alzheimer’s, obesity, diabetes, heart disease and cancer have only increased. How? This enigma can be answered a multitude of ways- I will do my best to explain the main culprits below…

The first problem with removing fat from our nation’s plates begins as a matter of calories. Now, if you are familiar with my view of nutrition or have visited me at Whole Health Houston you will know that I hate talking calories – counting, tracking, obsessing – it just doesn’t honor food (which if you haven’t heard is pretty darn essential to our survival therefore should be honored) and in the long run can harm or relationship with it… anyway, more on that below. According to research from Cornell University Food and Brand Lab, 28% more calories are consumed when we choose low-fat products because we think they can eat more of it than we should. So not only do we end up eating more overall calories in a day (remember, those extra calories are why fat is criticized in the first place) the majority of these calories are coming from processed carbohydrates! Think the low-fat yogurt, chips, cookies, candies and peanut butter you see dominating the grocery store isles (another reason to shop the perimeter of the grocery store). These products pack a processed carbohydrate, sugar and calorie bomb to our systems due to the dramatic shift they undergo when fat is removed to make them “low-fat” and therefore “healthier.”

This shift in macronutrient composition is due to the next problem with demonizing fat…flavor (or lack thereof). When the fat is removed from a food, so is the flavor. Low-fat foods taste bad – they just do – but food manufacturers have to sell their product so to make it palatable they add flavor enhancers, oxidized vegetable oils, iodized salt, colors, dyes and sugar. This swap of ingredients turns any food product that boasts the claim of low-fat to be synonymous with the label of high-carbohydrates. In addition to the abundance of highly processed carbohydrates, damaged vegetable oils replaced healthy saturated fats which become oxidized and lead to free radical accumulation and inflammation in the body. One can argue that it is too many of these processed, nutrient devoid, inflammation producing carbohydrates that is really at the root of our nation’s obesity epidemic.

This post is not one of doom and gloom, but of hope because major changes are on the horizon! In fact, this year’s Dietary Guidelines for Americans guidelines concluded that “reducing total fat (replacing total fat with overall carbohydrates) does not lower CVD [cardiovascular disease]risk… dietary advice should put the emphasis on optimizing types of dietary fat and not reducing total intake.” Furthermore, total fat was not recommended as a prevention for obesity, but instead LESS sugar-sweetened foods and drinks and refined grains are recommended! And the biggest relief of all – dietary cholesterol is no longer listed as a “nutrient of concern.” Meaning that research has proven that cholesterol isn’t the bad guy it has been made out to be! This change is parallel with recent scientific evidence that showing there is no relationship between dietary cholesterol and serum cholesterol.

Here at Whole Health Houston, we have been telling clients for a long time that health and nutrition is so much more than just a matter of balancing calories in vs. calories out. This claim can be justified by just one example: diet soda and water are not equals! If I told you and your family that all you have to do to be healthy is burn more calories than you eat, I could just tell you to drink all of the diet soda that you wanted because it has zero calories – just like water – so that means it is equally as healthy. You would probably call me crazy and leave my office because you know that water is essential to your survival whereas sodas are not. In fact, researchers have discovered that just one 12oz diet soda per week increases your risk of diabetes by 33%!

What’s more is that, “randomized trials confirm that diets higher in healthful fats, replacing carbohydrate or protein and exceeding the current 35% fat limit, reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease!” This is where we see that good old classic, healthy dietary sources of fat, rising above the rest and reigning supreme above all of those man-made fat-imposters. You see, nature doesn’t make a bad fat. This includes sources like pastured butter, pastured eggs, nuts and seeds, heavy cream, raw cheese, olive oil, olives, coconut oil, coconut milk, avocados and fats from fresh-caught fish as well as organic, grass-fed meats. These are the original sources of essential nutrition that should never have been messed with in the beginning. These fats help to promote weight loss, lower triglycerides, decrease inflammation and the harmful kind of LDL cholesterol that causes oxidative damage in our bodies.

Just like a classic car lover might say nothing will ever be able to replicate the original model-T car, I say nothing will ever be able to replicate unprocessed saturated fats found in nature. Don’t be fooled by refined seed oils like canola oil, corn oil, safflower oil, cottonseed oil, soybean oil and vegetable oils just because they tout the claim of being polyunsaturated fats. Polyunsatured fats don’t automatically mean healthy because they are not saturated. These industrial seed oils are heated to extract the oil from the seed which damages the fat and forms free radicals that mutate in the body. This process increases LDL particles (mostly bad guys) and decreases HDL particles (good guys), causes oxidation and a low-grade, systemic inflammation that is at the root of much of our nation’s health troubles today. Unlike polyunsaturated fats, saturated fats are not damaged when they are heated and therefore reduce inflammation in the body.

What’s more is the overuse of man-made (hydrogenated) and/or damaged fats that we are consuming in fried foods and baked goods. These are likely made from GMO-sources and are nearly impossible to avoid if you are eating outside of the home on a regular basis. In addition to harmful fats, there are many questionable ingredients used in restaurants that we simply would never cook with at home – making eating out more of a guessing game then you may realize. I encourage you to fill up with a balance of whole food carbohydrates, clean animal sources of protein and healthful fats prepared in the comfort of your own home as much as possible. I call it the MACRO-trio plan (look for more posts on this later or schedule an appointment with us to learn more). This way, when you do choose to enjoy a night out (let’s be honest, you wouldn’t want to avoid Tex-Mex in Houston forever, nor should you!) your body isn’t already at its breaking point and can handle some less than healthy choices! After all, life is about balance.

It may take some time to re-train our brains from the fat-phobia that has been instilled in us. However, I think these facts about fat will help with that process:

  1. Fat keeps us full. Fat contains more calories per gram than any other macronutrient (protein or carbohydrates), so if you are only focused on counting calories it may be the first place you look to cut back. Don’t do it! We will teach you that not all calories are created equal and that achieving your health goals is more than just about counting calories anyway. Flus, without fat our brain doesn’t get the signal that we are full and can stop eating. This leaves us with intense cravings for sugary foods and makes us feel deprived and hungry. That’s the exact opposite of what food should do for your body!
  2. Detox requires fat. The liver round up toxins from the entire body and collects them in bile which is stored in the gallbladder. When dietary fat is consumed, it triggers the release of bile to digest this fat and other foods we eat. This bile is then excreted in the feces. Without adequate dietary fat, this bile is not released and toxins build up in the gallbladder and liver. What’s more is this toxic load increases overtime and the body may reabsorb these stagnant toxins back into circulation.
  3. Fat aids in weight loss and weight management. Because weight loss is so much more than “calories in vs. calories out” fat actually encourages weight loss. Excess sugar in our body (carbohydrate), gets stored as fat which leads to undesirable weight gain. Protein and fat keep our blood sugars from spiking, and trigger the pancreas to secrete glucagon (the fat-burning hormone) instead of insulin (the fat-storing hormone). I am not encouraging you to cut out carbohydrates from your diet – carbohydrates are essential to your body too – we just need to choose the right kinds. Focus on fruits and vegetables as main carbohydrate sources, and consume every carbohydrate with a protein and a fat source.
  4. Vitamin activation. Fat soluble vitamins A, D, E and K are critical to overall health. As recorded by nutrition pioneer Weston A. Price, traditional diets of cultures from around the globe contained 10 times the amount of fat soluble vitamins than the modern diet. As one example, we can only obtain the active form of vitamin A from naturally fat-rich sources like cod liver oil, grass-fed dairy, liver, and egg yolks. Yep – only from these sources, not carrots! Not only are dietary fats a good source of these vitamins, they also activate vitamins found in other foods. For example, a plain bowl of steamed broccoli will actually be healthier for you with some good grass-fed butter on top of it!
  5. Falling and staying asleep. Did you know that enjoying a couple tablespoons of fat and about a half cup of carbohydrates (we teach you to visualize portions rather than count calories here) about 15 to 30 minutes before bed can you fall and stay asleep? Yes, technically there are carbohydrates and fat in a milkshake but this isn’t the kind of snack I am taking about! Try some guacamole and carrots, a delicious bowl of berries and heavy cream, celery slices or half a banana with almond butter or half of a sweet potato with coconut oil and cinnamon for your next bedtime snack and feel the difference in the AM!
  6. There is so much more… fat reduces inflammation, supports cholesterol balance, aids in proper brain function and is essential for hormone production (especially progesterone and testosterone)!

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2ks7wEe via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2o5AleH

By ICIM Member Valeska Wells DO: What’s the big FAT deal??

Ever notice how there are certain things in life that always come back in style? Whether it’s in the fashion world, architecture, old-fashioned films or cars… some classics always make their way back into the spotlight a few generations later. Just hang on to those bellbottoms a little longer- you’ll see! Well, I’m here to talk about one such classic of the nutrition world that was thought to be “out of style” (not to everyone) for a while, but now is back in the spotlight. A diet essential that we now know should never have been removed in the first place… dietary fat. That’s right- fat is back, baby! and we will all be better off for it!

Every five years the USDA and Department of Health and Human Services release the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. These established guidelines influence our food supply in numerous ways including school lunches, military food programs and recipes used in restaurants- it’s safe to say that they undoubtedly influence what you and your family eat on a regular basis. Thankfully, one major topic in this year’s revision was the role of dietary fat.

Since the late 1970’s, the Dietary Guidelines have recommended no more than 30% of calories to come from fat. This included all fats (not just saturated) because fat contains more calories (9) per gram than carbohydrates and protein (4), thus the proposal that low-fat diets would help prevent obesity. Seems simple enough, right? Well, if only nutrition were so cut and dry.

Soon enough low-fat foods made their way into every aisle of the grocery store and countless kitchens around the country. However, since this low-fat craze rates of Alzheimer’s, obesity, diabetes, heart disease and cancer have only increased. How? This enigma can be answered a multitude of ways- I will do my best to explain the main culprits below…

The first problem with removing fat from our nation’s plates begins as a matter of calories. Now, if you are familiar with my view of nutrition or have visited me at Whole Health Houston you will know that I hate talking calories – counting, tracking, obsessing – it just doesn’t honor food (which if you haven’t heard is pretty darn essential to our survival therefore should be honored) and in the long run can harm or relationship with it… anyway, more on that below. According to research from Cornell University Food and Brand Lab, 28% more calories are consumed when we choose low-fat products because we think they can eat more of it than we should. So not only do we end up eating more overall calories in a day (remember, those extra calories are why fat is criticized in the first place) the majority of these calories are coming from processed carbohydrates! Think the low-fat yogurt, chips, cookies, candies and peanut butter you see dominating the grocery store isles (another reason to shop the perimeter of the grocery store). These products pack a processed carbohydrate, sugar and calorie bomb to our systems due to the dramatic shift they undergo when fat is removed to make them “low-fat” and therefore “healthier.”

This shift in macronutrient composition is due to the next problem with demonizing fat…flavor (or lack thereof). When the fat is removed from a food, so is the flavor. Low-fat foods taste bad – they just do – but food manufacturers have to sell their product so to make it palatable they add flavor enhancers, oxidized vegetable oils, iodized salt, colors, dyes and sugar. This swap of ingredients turns any food product that boasts the claim of low-fat to be synonymous with the label of high-carbohydrates. In addition to the abundance of highly processed carbohydrates, damaged vegetable oils replaced healthy saturated fats which become oxidized and lead to free radical accumulation and inflammation in the body. One can argue that it is too many of these processed, nutrient devoid, inflammation producing carbohydrates that is really at the root of our nation’s obesity epidemic.

This post is not one of doom and gloom, but of hope because major changes are on the horizon! In fact, this year’s Dietary Guidelines for Americans guidelines concluded that “reducing total fat (replacing total fat with overall carbohydrates) does not lower CVD [cardiovascular disease]risk… dietary advice should put the emphasis on optimizing types of dietary fat and not reducing total intake.” Furthermore, total fat was not recommended as a prevention for obesity, but instead LESS sugar-sweetened foods and drinks and refined grains are recommended! And the biggest relief of all – dietary cholesterol is no longer listed as a “nutrient of concern.” Meaning that research has proven that cholesterol isn’t the bad guy it has been made out to be! This change is parallel with recent scientific evidence that showing there is no relationship between dietary cholesterol and serum cholesterol.

Here at Whole Health Houston, we have been telling clients for a long time that health and nutrition is so much more than just a matter of balancing calories in vs. calories out. This claim can be justified by just one example: diet soda and water are not equals! If I told you and your family that all you have to do to be healthy is burn more calories than you eat, I could just tell you to drink all of the diet soda that you wanted because it has zero calories – just like water – so that means it is equally as healthy. You would probably call me crazy and leave my office because you know that water is essential to your survival whereas sodas are not. In fact, researchers have discovered that just one 12oz diet soda per week increases your risk of diabetes by 33%!

What’s more is that, “randomized trials confirm that diets higher in healthful fats, replacing carbohydrate or protein and exceeding the current 35% fat limit, reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease!” This is where we see that good old classic, healthy dietary sources of fat, rising above the rest and reigning supreme above all of those man-made fat-imposters. You see, nature doesn’t make a bad fat. This includes sources like pastured butter, pastured eggs, nuts and seeds, heavy cream, raw cheese, olive oil, olives, coconut oil, coconut milk, avocados and fats from fresh-caught fish as well as organic, grass-fed meats. These are the original sources of essential nutrition that should never have been messed with in the beginning. These fats help to promote weight loss, lower triglycerides, decrease inflammation and the harmful kind of LDL cholesterol that causes oxidative damage in our bodies.

Just like a classic car lover might say nothing will ever be able to replicate the original model-T car, I say nothing will ever be able to replicate unprocessed saturated fats found in nature. Don’t be fooled by refined seed oils like canola oil, corn oil, safflower oil, cottonseed oil, soybean oil and vegetable oils just because they tout the claim of being polyunsaturated fats. Polyunsatured fats don’t automatically mean healthy because they are not saturated. These industrial seed oils are heated to extract the oil from the seed which damages the fat and forms free radicals that mutate in the body. This process increases LDL particles (mostly bad guys) and decreases HDL particles (good guys), causes oxidation and a low-grade, systemic inflammation that is at the root of much of our nation’s health troubles today. Unlike polyunsaturated fats, saturated fats are not damaged when they are heated and therefore reduce inflammation in the body.

What’s more is the overuse of man-made (hydrogenated) and/or damaged fats that we are consuming in fried foods and baked goods. These are likely made from GMO-sources and are nearly impossible to avoid if you are eating outside of the home on a regular basis. In addition to harmful fats, there are many questionable ingredients used in restaurants that we simply would never cook with at home – making eating out more of a guessing game then you may realize. I encourage you to fill up with a balance of whole food carbohydrates, clean animal sources of protein and healthful fats prepared in the comfort of your own home as much as possible. I call it the MACRO-trio plan (look for more posts on this later or schedule an appointment with us to learn more). This way, when you do choose to enjoy a night out (let’s be honest, you wouldn’t want to avoid Tex-Mex in Houston forever, nor should you!) your body isn’t already at its breaking point and can handle some less than healthy choices! After all, life is about balance.

It may take some time to re-train our brains from the fat-phobia that has been instilled in us. However, I think these facts about fat will help with that process:

  1. Fat keeps us full. Fat contains more calories per gram than any other macronutrient (protein or carbohydrates), so if you are only focused on counting calories it may be the first place you look to cut back. Don’t do it! We will teach you that not all calories are created equal and that achieving your health goals is more than just about counting calories anyway. Flus, without fat our brain doesn’t get the signal that we are full and can stop eating. This leaves us with intense cravings for sugary foods and makes us feel deprived and hungry. That’s the exact opposite of what food should do for your body!
  2. Detox requires fat. The liver round up toxins from the entire body and collects them in bile which is stored in the gallbladder. When dietary fat is consumed, it triggers the release of bile to digest this fat and other foods we eat. This bile is then excreted in the feces. Without adequate dietary fat, this bile is not released and toxins build up in the gallbladder and liver. What’s more is this toxic load increases overtime and the body may reabsorb these stagnant toxins back into circulation.
  3. Fat aids in weight loss and weight management. Because weight loss is so much more than “calories in vs. calories out” fat actually encourages weight loss. Excess sugar in our body (carbohydrate), gets stored as fat which leads to undesirable weight gain. Protein and fat keep our blood sugars from spiking, and trigger the pancreas to secrete glucagon (the fat-burning hormone) instead of insulin (the fat-storing hormone). I am not encouraging you to cut out carbohydrates from your diet – carbohydrates are essential to your body too – we just need to choose the right kinds. Focus on fruits and vegetables as main carbohydrate sources, and consume every carbohydrate with a protein and a fat source.
  4. Vitamin activation. Fat soluble vitamins A, D, E and K are critical to overall health. As recorded by nutrition pioneer Weston A. Price, traditional diets of cultures from around the globe contained 10 times the amount of fat soluble vitamins than the modern diet. As one example, we can only obtain the active form of vitamin A from naturally fat-rich sources like cod liver oil, grass-fed dairy, liver, and egg yolks. Yep – only from these sources, not carrots! Not only are dietary fats a good source of these vitamins, they also activate vitamins found in other foods. For example, a plain bowl of steamed broccoli will actually be healthier for you with some good grass-fed butter on top of it!
  5. Falling and staying asleep. Did you know that enjoying a couple tablespoons of fat and about a half cup of carbohydrates (we teach you to visualize portions rather than count calories here) about 15 to 30 minutes before bed can you fall and stay asleep? Yes, technically there are carbohydrates and fat in a milkshake but this isn’t the kind of snack I am taking about! Try some guacamole and carrots, a delicious bowl of berries and heavy cream, celery slices or half a banana with almond butter or half of a sweet potato with coconut oil and cinnamon for your next bedtime snack and feel the difference in the AM!
  6. There is so much more… fat reduces inflammation, supports cholesterol balance, aids in proper brain function and is essential for hormone production (especially progesterone and testosterone)!


from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2ks7wEe via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2jTUvDY

Are You Getting Enough Vitamin D?

Definitely not, if you’re following the government’s recommendations.

GrassrootsHealth, an organization dedicated to disseminating information about vitamin D research, has now confirmed a previous finding that the National Academy of Medicine (IOM),  the government’s advisor on health and medical issues, is off by a magnitude of ten in its recommended daily intake of vitamin D.

From GrassrootsHealth:

The recommended intake of vitamin D specified by the IOM is 600 IU/day through age 70 years, and 800 IU/day for older ages. Calculations by GrassrootsHealth scientists and other researchers have shown that these doses are only about one-tenth those needed to cut incidence of diseases related to vitamin D deficiency. The authors propose a new RDA with a value of approximately 7,000 IU/day from all sources.

Comment: Changes in American lifestyles mean that many people get less exposure to the sun, the principal way we get vitamin D, combined with inadequate dietary levels of the vitamin. The New York Times reports that a number of prominent doctors have advised vitamin D supplementation for a wide variety of illnesses, including heart disease, cancer, and autoimmune diseases. Their research shows that more and more people know their vitamin D levels because these are being tested as part of routine physical exams. Keeping D levels in the upper part of the accepted blood range also appears to be highly protective against viral infection and cancer.

Let’s also keep in mind that this is just part of a larger problem. We must ensure that we don’t go the way of the European Union in setting strict limits for what the maximum dose in a vitamin can be.

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2C3XDnl via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2BoMrF0

Are You Getting Enough Vitamin D?

Definitely not, if you’re following the government’s recommendations.

GrassrootsHealth, an organization dedicated to disseminating information about vitamin D research, has now confirmed a previous finding that the National Academy of Medicine (IOM),  the government’s advisor on health and medical issues, is off by a magnitude of ten in its recommended daily intake of vitamin D.

From GrassrootsHealth:

The recommended intake of vitamin D specified by the IOM is 600 IU/day through age 70 years, and 800 IU/day for older ages. Calculations by GrassrootsHealth scientists and other researchers have shown that these doses are only about one-tenth those needed to cut incidence of diseases related to vitamin D deficiency. The authors propose a new RDA with a value of approximately 7,000 IU/day from all sources.

Comment: Changes in American lifestyles mean that many people get less exposure to the sun, the principal way we get vitamin D, combined with inadequate dietary levels of the vitamin. The New York Times reports that a number of prominent doctors have advised vitamin D supplementation for a wide variety of illnesses, including heart disease, cancer, and autoimmune diseases. Their research shows that more and more people know their vitamin D levels because these are being tested as part of routine physical exams. Keeping D levels in the upper part of the accepted blood range also appears to be highly protective against viral infection and cancer.

Let’s also keep in mind that this is just part of a larger problem. We must ensure that we don’t go the way of the European Union in setting strict limits for what the maximum dose in a vitamin can be.



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2C3XDnl via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2AGfvbH

Action Alert: More Research on Aluminum

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2ksqeeF via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2o1BW5b

Action Alert: More Research on Aluminum



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2ksqeeF via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2jShkrG

Action Alert: Protect Resveratrol

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2B0wpPg via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2jSxgdt

Action Alert: Protect Resveratrol



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2B0wpPg via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2AH77IK

Action Alert: Protect Bioidentical Hormones

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2Cjj9W3 via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2AJ4DJS

Action Alert: Protect Bioidentical Hormones



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2Cjj9W3 via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2CiqSDL

Thursday, December 7, 2017

Fight Back Against the FDA’s Attack on Supplements

The agency is deciding what to do about “old” supplements—tell them what you think! Action Alert!

Last year, we told you about the FDA’s massive attack on supplements that came in the form of a guidance document. That guidance is meant to provide clarity to supplement companies regarding “new supplements”—referred to as new dietary ingredients, or NDIs.

Federal law requires companies to submit a notification to the FDA before an NDI is sold in the US. Federal law also defines a NDI as an ingredient that was not marketed in the US before 1994—meaning that supplements marketed before 1994 are “old dietary ingredients,” or ODIs, for which no notification is required.

This leaves the question: how will companies know which supplements are considered NDIs and which are considered ODIs?

The FDA is asking for feedback from the public on whether or not to develop an official list of ODI ingredients.

While the creation of an official list may sound like a good thing, we think it’s possible that the FDA would use such a list to target supplements. FDA inspectors could simply go to a vitamin store with their ODI list, and anything that is either not on the list or doesn’t have an approved NDI notification would be wiped off the shelves.

ANH-USA has prepared comments to submit to the FDA that make the following points:

  • As FDA staff have themselves pointed out, no law requires the creation of an ODI list; therefore, no ODI list should be created;
  • If the FDA does decide to create a list, the omission of a supplement from the list should be “neutral”—meaning the exclusion of an ingredient from the list does not automatically make it an NDI;
  • The list should never be closed, accepting new ODIs on a rolling basis;
  • The FDA should broadly interpret the term “marketed” when creating an ODI list. The FDA has maintained that, for a supplement to be an ODI, it needed to be marketed in or as a dietary supplement before 1994. This excludes many nutrients that were in the food supply but not listed on the bottle of a supplement. Instead, the FDA should consider ODIs to be dietary ingredients that were sold, in any form, before 1994.

The FDA’s proposed NDI notification process remains one of the largest threats to the supplement industry ever. A win here would be a significant step toward fixing the mess that the FDA created.

Action Alert! Write your own message to the FDA, urging them to follow the course outlined above. Please send your message immediately.

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2kuyvCx via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2j2OaZF

New Danger from Weedkillers

Now they’ve been linked to antibiotic resistance. Action Alert!

A new study published in Microbiology finds that both the active and “inert” ingredients in common herbicides induce antibiotic resistance in human pathogenic bacteria. The researchers found that antibiotic resistance was conferred to Salmonella and E.coli even at exposure levels below those found in the environment.

Remember that “inert” ingredients in herbicides are anything but. Professor Gilles-Eric Séralini and his team determined that herbicides can be up to 1,000 times more toxic to human cells than just the active ingredient.

Not only are these products toxic to humans—they are helping to render our medicines ineffective.

Rather than protect consumers, however, government cronies are protecting their friends in the chemical industry. Recall that Jess Rowland, a former top EPA official, helped Monsanto quash an effort by the Department of Health to conduct its own review of glyphosate, among other actions to shield that giant company.

Action Alert! Write to Congress and the EPA, urging more oversight of dangerous herbicides that takes the toxicity of “inert” ingredients into account—to protect human health and the ability of medicines to actually cure. Please send your message immediately.

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2ktqX2X via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2j2vucy

Action Alert: Fight Back Against the FDA’s Attack on Supplements

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2j2RP9A via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2j2vr0m

New Attack on Raw Milk

The feds persist in curtailing free and organic enterprise. Action Alert!

Following the case of a single woman who became sick from Brucella, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has issued a warning urging anyone who has drunk raw milk in the past six months to go to a doctor immediately.

It’s the second time this year the CDC has warned about raw milk. Earlier, the agency responded to proposals in Montana and Iowa that would loosen restrictions on the sale of raw milk in that state. The FDA has banned the interstate sale or distribution of raw milk, and has taken an aggressive stance towards raw milk purveyors.

The vendetta against raw milk is completely unjustified. As our friends at the Weston A. Price Foundation point out in their campaign for “real milk,” raw milk has a proven safety record and has shown to be superior to pasteurized milk in protecting against infection, diarrhea, rickets, tooth decay, and tuberculosis. Children drinking raw milk also have better growth rates than those drinking pasteurized milk.

ANH–USA believes consumers should have the right to access non-processed foods, and farmers should be able to offer these products directly to consumers. Americans should be able to educate themselves about any risks versus benefits, and make their own decisions without being hassled by the government.

Why the hostility toward raw milk? The way we see it, the FDA prefers to concentrate food and drug production in the hands of a few large companies with which the agency has close ties. But favoring large producers over family and artisanal producers does not make our food any safer. On the contrary, it makes it less nutritious, makes commerce less free, and also invites more corruption as powerful companies grow rich from government-created monopolies.

Following President Trump’s call to eliminate burdensome or duplicative regulations, ANH has suggested, among other things, that the FDA relent on its raw milk ban, and instead allow for labeling of raw milk products. Such labeling would alert consumers to the risks associated with consuming unpasteurized milk products, and provide directions for how to home pasteurize raw milk to avoid those risks. With such labeling, there is no reason, other than to protect the pasteurized milk industry from competition, to block the sale of raw milk and milk by-products.

To this end, the FDA and the CDC should hear from consumers who want raw milk restrictions lifted.

Action Alert! Tell the CDC and the FDA that raw milk is healthy and safe, and that the FDA should lift its ban on raw milk provided there is labeling alerting consumers to the risks. Please send your message immediately.

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2j3InTE via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2j2vmK6

Action Alert: New Danger from Weedkillers

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2j1KJCk via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2j2bPt2

Fight Back Against the FDA’s Attack on Supplements

The agency is deciding what to do about “old” supplements—tell them what you think! Action Alert!

Last year, we told you about the FDA’s massive attack on supplements that came in the form of a guidance document. That guidance is meant to provide clarity to supplement companies regarding “new supplements”—referred to as new dietary ingredients, or NDIs.

Federal law requires companies to submit a notification to the FDA before an NDI is sold in the US. Federal law also defines a NDI as an ingredient that was not marketed in the US before 1994—meaning that supplements marketed before 1994 are “old dietary ingredients,” or ODIs, for which no notification is required.

This leaves the question: how will companies know which supplements are considered NDIs and which are considered ODIs?

The FDA is asking for feedback from the public on whether or not to develop an official list of ODI ingredients.

While the creation of an official list may sound like a good thing, we think it’s possible that the FDA would use such a list to target supplements. FDA inspectors could simply go to a vitamin store with their ODI list, and anything that is either not on the list or doesn’t have an approved NDI notification would be wiped off the shelves.

ANH-USA has prepared comments to submit to the FDA that make the following points:

  • As FDA staff have themselves pointed out, no law requires the creation of an ODI list; therefore, no ODI list should be created;
  • If the FDA does decide to create a list, the omission of a supplement from the list should be “neutral”—meaning the exclusion of an ingredient from the list does not automatically make it an NDI;
  • The list should never be closed, accepting new ODIs on a rolling basis;
  • The FDA should broadly interpret the term “marketed” when creating an ODI list. The FDA has maintained that, for a supplement to be an ODI, it needed to be marketed in or as a dietary supplement before 1994. This excludes many nutrients that were in the food supply but not listed on the bottle of a supplement. Instead, the FDA should consider ODIs to be dietary ingredients that were sold, in any form, before 1994.

The FDA’s proposed NDI notification process remains one of the largest threats to the supplement industry ever. A win here would be a significant step toward fixing the mess that the FDA created.

Action Alert! Write your own message to the FDA, urging them to follow the course outlined above. Please send your message immediately.



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2kuyvCx via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2BbNMPX

New Danger from Weedkillers

Now they’ve been linked to antibiotic resistance. Action Alert!

A new study published in Microbiology finds that both the active and “inert” ingredients in common herbicides induce antibiotic resistance in human pathogenic bacteria. The researchers found that antibiotic resistance was conferred to Salmonella and E.coli even at exposure levels below those found in the environment.

Remember that “inert” ingredients in herbicides are anything but. Professor Gilles-Eric Séralini and his team determined that herbicides can be up to 1,000 times more toxic to human cells than just the active ingredient.

Not only are these products toxic to humans—they are helping to render our medicines ineffective.

Rather than protect consumers, however, government cronies are protecting their friends in the chemical industry. Recall that Jess Rowland, a former top EPA official, helped Monsanto quash an effort by the Department of Health to conduct its own review of glyphosate, among other actions to shield that giant company.

Action Alert! Write to Congress and the EPA, urging more oversight of dangerous herbicides that takes the toxicity of “inert” ingredients into account—to protect human health and the ability of medicines to actually cure. Please send your message immediately.



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2ktqX2X via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2An2ymI

Action Alert: Fight Back Against the FDA’s Attack on Supplements



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2j2RP9A via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2BhdnHc

New Attack on Raw Milk

The feds persist in curtailing free and organic enterprise. Action Alert!

Following the case of a single woman who became sick from Brucella, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has issued a warning urging anyone who has drunk raw milk in the past six months to go to a doctor immediately.

It’s the second time this year the CDC has warned about raw milk. Earlier, the agency responded to proposals in Montana and Iowa that would loosen restrictions on the sale of raw milk in that state. The FDA has banned the interstate sale or distribution of raw milk, and has taken an aggressive stance towards raw milk purveyors.

The vendetta against raw milk is completely unjustified. As our friends at the Weston A. Price Foundation point out in their campaign for “real milk,” raw milk has a proven safety record and has shown to be superior to pasteurized milk in protecting against infection, diarrhea, rickets, tooth decay, and tuberculosis. Children drinking raw milk also have better growth rates than those drinking pasteurized milk.

ANH–USA believes consumers should have the right to access non-processed foods, and farmers should be able to offer these products directly to consumers. Americans should be able to educate themselves about any risks versus benefits, and make their own decisions without being hassled by the government.

Why the hostility toward raw milk? The way we see it, the FDA prefers to concentrate food and drug production in the hands of a few large companies with which the agency has close ties. But favoring large producers over family and artisanal producers does not make our food any safer. On the contrary, it makes it less nutritious, makes commerce less free, and also invites more corruption as powerful companies grow rich from government-created monopolies.

Following President Trump’s call to eliminate burdensome or duplicative regulations, ANH has suggested, among other things, that the FDA relent on its raw milk ban, and instead allow for labeling of raw milk products. Such labeling would alert consumers to the risks associated with consuming unpasteurized milk products, and provide directions for how to home pasteurize raw milk to avoid those risks. With such labeling, there is no reason, other than to protect the pasteurized milk industry from competition, to block the sale of raw milk and milk by-products.

To this end, the FDA and the CDC should hear from consumers who want raw milk restrictions lifted.

Action Alert! Tell the CDC and the FDA that raw milk is healthy and safe, and that the FDA should lift its ban on raw milk provided there is labeling alerting consumers to the risks. Please send your message immediately.



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2j3InTE via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2Ak8g9b

Action Alert: New Danger from Weedkillers



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2j1KJCk via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2BbZb25

Action Alert: Protect Raw Milk

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2ABd48V via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2AkWRpq

DeMythified- FDA Approved

More Info

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2ABd0Gd via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2AkFYLJ

Action Alert: Protect Raw Milk



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2ABd48V via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2ABuzpC

DeMythified- FDA Approved

More Info



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2ABd0Gd via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2nHlbMC

Wednesday, December 6, 2017

By ICIM Member Alexander Mostovoy HD, DHMS, BCCT: Progesterone and Cancer Prevention

Many articles and papers have been written that implicate estrogen in connection to breast cancer. While this is a well accepted factor now in treatment of breast cancer, less written about is the importance of progesterone for the prevention of breast cancer.

Progesterone reduces estrogen’s stimulating of breast cancer growth with several well known biochemical events that lead to tumour growth:

Progesterone increases the level of enzymes that convert cancer prolific estrogen (estradiol) to inactive cancer protective estrogen (estrone sulfate).

Progesterone inhibits estrogen activity in the breast tissue and decreases the probability of clotting.

Progesterone prevents angiogenesis known to be a major contributor in early stage of breast cancer tumour formation and growth.

Progesterone prevents vasodilatation caused by excess estrogen and thus acts as an anti metastatic agent

Progesterone activates natural killer cells that function as in immune defence mechanism destroying cancer cells.

Progesterone has a calming effect, helps with perceived  stress, thus lowering cortisol production by the adrenals

Here’s the critical point about progesterone for breast cancer prevention: synthetic progestins promote breast cancer and heart disease, while natural progesterone beneficially lowers breast cancer and heart disease risk. Progestin (synthetic) is NOT Progesterone (natural). Unfortunately many physicians believe progestins to be equivalent to progesterone. This is a mistake.

The enzymes needed to metabolize progesterone are present in the human body, not so with progestin. Further, the biochemical structures of several synthetic progestins have carbon-carbon bonds, which are not present in the hormones that humans have. Thus synthetic progestin has well known detrimental effects on women’s health while progesterone has beneficial effects on breast health and cancer prevention.

Of course, your breast cancer prevention strategy has to include other contributing factors, such as healthy diet, physical activity, avoidance of pollutants, stress reduction and possibly natural progesterone therapy. Investigate and see if this will work for you.

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2B8FyYL via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2jl6Wby

By ICIM Member Alexander Mostovoy HD, DHMS, BCCT: Progesterone and Cancer Prevention

Many articles and papers have been written that implicate estrogen in connection to breast cancer. While this is a well accepted factor now in treatment of breast cancer, less written about is the importance of progesterone for the prevention of breast cancer.

Progesterone reduces estrogen’s stimulating of breast cancer growth with several well known biochemical events that lead to tumour growth:

Progesterone increases the level of enzymes that convert cancer prolific estrogen (estradiol) to inactive cancer protective estrogen (estrone sulfate).

Progesterone inhibits estrogen activity in the breast tissue and decreases the probability of clotting.

Progesterone prevents angiogenesis known to be a major contributor in early stage of breast cancer tumour formation and growth.

Progesterone prevents vasodilatation caused by excess estrogen and thus acts as an anti metastatic agent

Progesterone activates natural killer cells that function as in immune defence mechanism destroying cancer cells.

Progesterone has a calming effect, helps with perceived  stress, thus lowering cortisol production by the adrenals

Here’s the critical point about progesterone for breast cancer prevention: synthetic progestins promote breast cancer and heart disease, while natural progesterone beneficially lowers breast cancer and heart disease risk. Progestin (synthetic) is NOT Progesterone (natural). Unfortunately many physicians believe progestins to be equivalent to progesterone. This is a mistake.

The enzymes needed to metabolize progesterone are present in the human body, not so with progestin. Further, the biochemical structures of several synthetic progestins have carbon-carbon bonds, which are not present in the hormones that humans have. Thus synthetic progestin has well known detrimental effects on women’s health while progesterone has beneficial effects on breast health and cancer prevention.

Of course, your breast cancer prevention strategy has to include other contributing factors, such as healthy diet, physical activity, avoidance of pollutants, stress reduction and possibly natural progesterone therapy. Investigate and see if this will work for you.



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2B8FyYL via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2BFCq2M