Friday, April 28, 2017

Supplement Advocates Are Losing a Champion in Congress

Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT), a noted champion of natural supplements, has announced he will not seek re-election in 2018. The announcement came last week. He may even retire before his term ends.

As one of natural health’s foremost advocates in Congress, we are sad to see him go. Rep. Chaffetz was a staunch supporter of consumer access to dietary supplements, both in principle and in action. He weighed in with the FDA numerous times over the years against the agency’s disastrous new dietary ingredient (NDI) guidance.

The congressman also fought repeatedly for free speech rights and the right of consumers to have access to truthful scientific information about the benefits of natural products by sponsoring the Free Speech About Science Act.

It’s no secret that Big Pharma has many allies in Congress—not to mention within the FDA—and it has tremendous influence over the formation of healthcare policy in this country. Rep. Chaffetz stands among our country’s most effective and vocal champions for natural health issues, and he will be sorely missed when he leaves office.

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2oG8t0x via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2oGoJP1

Supplement Advocates Are Losing a Champion in Congress

Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT), a noted champion of natural supplements, has announced he will not seek re-election in 2018. The announcement came last week. He may even retire before his term ends.

As one of natural health’s foremost advocates in Congress, we are sad to see him go. Rep. Chaffetz was a staunch supporter of consumer access to dietary supplements, both in principle and in action. He weighed in with the FDA numerous times over the years against the agency’s disastrous new dietary ingredient (NDI) guidance.

The congressman also fought repeatedly for free speech rights and the right of consumers to have access to truthful scientific information about the benefits of natural products by sponsoring the Free Speech About Science Act.

It’s no secret that Big Pharma has many allies in Congress—not to mention within the FDA—and it has tremendous influence over the formation of healthcare policy in this country. Rep. Chaffetz stands among our country’s most effective and vocal champions for natural health issues, and he will be sorely missed when he leaves office.



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2oG8t0x via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2pdcI2o

Thursday, April 27, 2017

Help Protect Vaccine Choice

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2oNyTZi via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2oBfxeG

Help Protect Vaccine Choice



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2oNyTZi via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2pE6lGH

Frankencitrus Coming to a Store Near You?

A new ruling is expected to pave the way for genetically modified citrus to enter your local stores—but a loophole allows the food industry to keep you in the dark about the nature of the fruit you’re purchasing.

The Animal Plant Health and Inspection Service (APHIS) is getting ready to do an environmental impact statement on a genetically modified citrus tree. If past experience is any guide, the government will most likely approve this latest GMO experiment.

Here’s the rub: the trees are treated with a genetically modified virus that makes them resistant to citrus greening disease, which has caused major problems for citrus growers in Florida. But according to the government’s definition, neither the trees nor the fruit will be considered genetically modified (an assertion that is patently absurd), so once again consumers will be in the dark about what kind of food they’ll be eating.

This increasingly seems to be the direction food companies will take. As we reported previously, we are in the Wild West of genetic manipulation, hacking, and experimentation. Government funding for projects using CRISPR, a gene-editing tool, has skyrocketed in recent years, and there’s a mad dash for patents that use the technology.

Soon, it seems, most of the products on store shelves will be genetically modified in some way—but consumers will have no way of actually knowing, and not simply because of the sham labeling bill that Congress passed in 2016.

 

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2qcI7TM via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2qcXWK5

Guilty: Monsanto, Global Villain

The international community delivered a blow to our government’s buddy, Monsanto. Will federal government cronies listen?

The International Monsanto Tribunal in the Hague, Netherlands, is an international civil society initiative to hold Monsanto accountable for human rights violations, for crimes against humanity, and for ecocide. Last October, eminent judges heard testimonies from victims.

Last week, following procedures established by the International Court of Justice, judges presiding over the tribunal delivered its legal opinion regarding Monsanto’s impact on human rights, the environment, access to food, and scientific integrity after hearing testimony from thirty witnesses and experts from around the world.

Their conclusion: Monsanto’s business activities infringe on our right to a clean, sustainable environment. The tribunal stated that the company’s seed empire adversely affects the world’s access to food, and that by manufacturing and distributing substances such as PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls) and glyphosate, Monsanto has infringed on our right to high standards of health. Additionally, the tribunal found that Monsanto perverts scientific freedom by practicing forms of intimidation, pressuring governments, and discrediting legitimate scientific research that supports public health and environmental protection.

The ruling is not legally binding and is therefore largely symbolic, but it exposes the rampant cronyism that prevails in our government. While the EPA contorts itself in a failed attempt to show that glyphosate is safe, and Congress decides that it isn’t all that important for the public to know if a product is genetically modified or not, it is crucial for experts to speak up and for sanity to prevail. With international opinion clearly forming against Monsanto, will our federal agencies get on board, or continue to do Monsanto’s bidding?

Check out our video on the subject for things you can do to fight against Monsanto.

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2qcLzO4 via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2qcHd9R

Frankencitrus Coming to a Store Near You?

A new ruling is expected to pave the way for genetically modified citrus to enter your local stores—but a loophole allows the food industry to keep you in the dark about the nature of the fruit you’re purchasing.

The Animal Plant Health and Inspection Service (APHIS) is getting ready to do an environmental impact statement on a genetically modified citrus tree. If past experience is any guide, the government will most likely approve this latest GMO experiment.

Here’s the rub: the trees are treated with a genetically modified virus that makes them resistant to citrus greening disease, which has caused major problems for citrus growers in Florida. But according to the government’s definition, neither the trees nor the fruit will be considered genetically modified (an assertion that is patently absurd), so once again consumers will be in the dark about what kind of food they’ll be eating.

This increasingly seems to be the direction food companies will take. As we reported previously, we are in the Wild West of genetic manipulation, hacking, and experimentation. Government funding for projects using CRISPR, a gene-editing tool, has skyrocketed in recent years, and there’s a mad dash for patents that use the technology.

Soon, it seems, most of the products on store shelves will be genetically modified in some way—but consumers will have no way of actually knowing, and not simply because of the sham labeling bill that Congress passed in 2016.

 



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2qcI7TM via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2qcSNC2

Guilty: Monsanto, Global Villain

The international community delivered a blow to our government’s buddy, Monsanto. Will federal government cronies listen?

The International Monsanto Tribunal in the Hague, Netherlands, is an international civil society initiative to hold Monsanto accountable for human rights violations, for crimes against humanity, and for ecocide. Last October, eminent judges heard testimonies from victims.

Last week, following procedures established by the International Court of Justice, judges presiding over the tribunal delivered its legal opinion regarding Monsanto’s impact on human rights, the environment, access to food, and scientific integrity after hearing testimony from thirty witnesses and experts from around the world.

Their conclusion: Monsanto’s business activities infringe on our right to a clean, sustainable environment. The tribunal stated that the company’s seed empire adversely affects the world’s access to food, and that by manufacturing and distributing substances such as PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls) and glyphosate, Monsanto has infringed on our right to high standards of health. Additionally, the tribunal found that Monsanto perverts scientific freedom by practicing forms of intimidation, pressuring governments, and discrediting legitimate scientific research that supports public health and environmental protection.

The ruling is not legally binding and is therefore largely symbolic, but it exposes the rampant cronyism that prevails in our government. While the EPA contorts itself in a failed attempt to show that glyphosate is safe, and Congress decides that it isn’t all that important for the public to know if a product is genetically modified or not, it is crucial for experts to speak up and for sanity to prevail. With international opinion clearly forming against Monsanto, will our federal agencies get on board, or continue to do Monsanto’s bidding?

Check out our video on the subject for things you can do to fight against Monsanto.



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2qcLzO4 via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2oQqG7I

Tuesday, April 25, 2017

Monsanto Tribunal

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2oHSoDy via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2q2vmLt

Monsanto Tribunal



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2oHSoDy via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2phl1e3

Even More Natural Medicines Are Now at Risk

The FDA is likely to move against numerous natural, compounded medicines. Action Alert!

The Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee (PCAC) advises the FDA on what supplements and drugs can be individually formulated for patients—many of whom have very specific needs that can only be met through these alternative formulations. The next meeting of the PCAC has been announced for May 8-9, and the following substances will will likely face the axe: nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (as well as the disodium-reduced version), which plays an important role in our health (see below); nettle (Urtica dioica); ubiquinol (CoOQ10); vanadyl sulfate; and artemisinin, a critical medicine used against malaria and other diseases.

Also on the agenda is the nomination of “oral solid modified release drug products that employ coated systems”—that is, coated time-release tablets—to the “Difficult to Compound” list. As the name suggests, if a product or delivery system is added to this list, it will no longer be available from compounding pharmacies.

As has been the case in past meetings, the FDA has recommended that all of these substances be rejected. Since the PCAC almost always follows the FDA’s lead, we will need a strong response from concerned consumers if we’re to save these natural medicines.

Here’s what’s at stake:

  • Artemisinin is a compound found in sweet wormwood, an herb that has been used in traditional Chinese medicine for centuries. It is most notably used to treat malaria, but it may also be helpful for tuberculosis and a host of other conditions. Considering the rise of drug-resistant TB, which is virtually untreatable and is sending conventional doctors into a panic, it would be lunacy to restrict access to this herb.
  • Ubiquinol is by far the most effective, bioavailable form of CoQ10. Some people may not be able to convert the ubiquinone form of CoQ10 into ubiquinol, which means access to ubiquinol products is extremely important. CoQ10 / ubiquinol has many benefits—it is used for energy production by every cell in the body. It is especially useful for patients on statins since these drugs deplete the body of CoQ10.
  • Nettle has a number of salutary effects. It was used by Roman soldiers to withstand the cold by stimulating blood circulation. It helps the body detoxify itself, alleviates allergic reactions, and promotes healthy blood circulation.
  • Vanadyl sulfate is an insulin mimic and a natural therapy for diabetes and insulin resistance. It is a form of a trace mineral found in mushrooms and shellfish.
  • Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) is a vital compound involved in mitochondrial health and energy metabolism. As NAD levels decline later in life, mitochondrial function is impaired, resulting in various symptoms of aging. NAD is also an essential cofactor of certain key enzymes that are responsible for longevity. Every year we are learning more about how critical NAD is, including for cancer control.

Compounding pharmacies make customized, natural medicines for patients for whom it is difficult to swallow a pill (the elderly and patients with disabilities, for example), as well as for patients with allergies, sensitivities to environmental contaminants and preservatives, or who require doses or delivery systems different than those of commercially available products. The ability of compounding pharmacies to function, thrive, and produce these crucial supplements plays a crucial role in people’s lives.

The FDA has repeatedly demonstrated that it is unconcerned with the needs of these vulnerable patients. Time and time again, the FDA has advised the PCAC to reject the medicines that come before it—medicines for which there is little to no safety concern, like curcumin, boswellia, and aloe vera.

It has long been our suspicion that the end goal is to eliminate the compounding industry altogether, and this is a devious way to do it—just whittle away at the ingredients that are allowed to be compounded, and it’s “death by a thousands cuts” for compounding pharmacies. And it’s all done to eliminate competition for major drug companies. We see this as yet another instance of the FDA putting the needs of Big Pharma over the health of the American people.

Action Alert! Send a message to the PCAC urging it to approve the ingredients that have been nominated to the Bulk Ingredient List—and send a copy to Congress as well. Your legislators need to see what is happening to their compounding law! Please send your message immediately.

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2qapBrl via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2pvCeRy

Action Alert: Tell PCAC to Protect Compounding!

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2qapFaL via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2pvKYHu

Even More Natural Medicines Are Now at Risk

The FDA is likely to move against numerous natural, compounded medicines. Action Alert!

The Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee (PCAC) advises the FDA on what supplements and drugs can be individually formulated for patients—many of whom have very specific needs that can only be met through these alternative formulations. The next meeting of the PCAC has been announced for May 8-9, and the following substances will will likely face the axe: nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (as well as the disodium-reduced version), which plays an important role in our health (see below); nettle (Urtica dioica); ubiquinol (CoOQ10); vanadyl sulfate; and artemisinin, a critical medicine used against malaria and other diseases.

Also on the agenda is the nomination of “oral solid modified release drug products that employ coated systems”—that is, coated time-release tablets—to the “Difficult to Compound” list. As the name suggests, if a product or delivery system is added to this list, it will no longer be available from compounding pharmacies.

As has been the case in past meetings, the FDA has recommended that all of these substances be rejected. Since the PCAC almost always follows the FDA’s lead, we will need a strong response from concerned consumers if we’re to save these natural medicines.

Here’s what’s at stake:

  • Artemisinin is a compound found in sweet wormwood, an herb that has been used in traditional Chinese medicine for centuries. It is most notably used to treat malaria, but it may also be helpful for tuberculosis and a host of other conditions. Considering the rise of drug-resistant TB, which is virtually untreatable and is sending conventional doctors into a panic, it would be lunacy to restrict access to this herb.
  • Ubiquinol is by far the most effective, bioavailable form of CoQ10. Some people may not be able to convert the ubiquinone form of CoQ10 into ubiquinol, which means access to ubiquinol products is extremely important. CoQ10 / ubiquinol has many benefits—it is used for energy production by every cell in the body. It is especially useful for patients on statins since these drugs deplete the body of CoQ10.
  • Nettle has a number of salutary effects. It was used by Roman soldiers to withstand the cold by stimulating blood circulation. It helps the body detoxify itself, alleviates allergic reactions, and promotes healthy blood circulation.
  • Vanadyl sulfate is an insulin mimic and a natural therapy for diabetes and insulin resistance. It is a form of a trace mineral found in mushrooms and shellfish.
  • Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) is a vital compound involved in mitochondrial health and energy metabolism. As NAD levels decline later in life, mitochondrial function is impaired, resulting in various symptoms of aging. NAD is also an essential cofactor of certain key enzymes that are responsible for longevity. Every year we are learning more about how critical NAD is, including for cancer control.

Compounding pharmacies make customized, natural medicines for patients for whom it is difficult to swallow a pill (the elderly and patients with disabilities, for example), as well as for patients with allergies, sensitivities to environmental contaminants and preservatives, or who require doses or delivery systems different than those of commercially available products. The ability of compounding pharmacies to function, thrive, and produce these crucial supplements plays a crucial role in people’s lives.

The FDA has repeatedly demonstrated that it is unconcerned with the needs of these vulnerable patients. Time and time again, the FDA has advised the PCAC to reject the medicines that come before it—medicines for which there is little to no safety concern, like curcumin, boswellia, and aloe vera.

It has long been our suspicion that the end goal is to eliminate the compounding industry altogether, and this is a devious way to do it—just whittle away at the ingredients that are allowed to be compounded, and it’s “death by a thousands cuts” for compounding pharmacies. And it’s all done to eliminate competition for major drug companies. We see this as yet another instance of the FDA putting the needs of Big Pharma over the health of the American people.

Action Alert! Send a message to the PCAC urging it to approve the ingredients that have been nominated to the Bulk Ingredient List—and send a copy to Congress as well. Your legislators need to see what is happening to their compounding law! Please send your message immediately.



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2qapBrl via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2pvzSCm

Action Alert: Tell PCAC to Protect Compounding!



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2qapFaL via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2os0TGO

Monday, April 24, 2017

Still Think the FDA Looks Out for Consumers?

While the national movement that swept Donald Trump into office leaned heavily on a “Drain the Swamp” slogan, FDA officials are filling the swamp with more murky water and many of them are leaving the agency en masse to work at a Big Pharma consulting/lobbying firm.

Greenleaf Health, which may not have been on your radar, is the beneficiary of this influx of agency personnel. It’s a DC-based consulting firm that helps the pharmaceutical industry get products through FDA approval and avoid enforcement actions.

Greenleaf boasts an impressive assembly of former FDA officials. This is especially true after a recent high-profile hire, Dr. John Jenkins, a twenty-five-year agency veteran and the former director of the Office of New Drugs, where he oversaw the review of thousands of new drug applications. Dr. Jenkins also reportedly played a major role in implementing the Prescription Drug User Fee Act—the legislation that allowed the FDA to collect fees from Big Pharma to fund the drug approval process.

This is a prime example of the revolving door between the FDA and Big Pharma. Not only does the drug industry fund the FDA through user fees—regulators are often sitting across the table from their future employers.

It’s no wonder that in our present crony capitalist medical system, drugs like Vioxx and Avandia, responsible for tens of thousands of deaths, make it through the agency! Or that legitimate drugs fail because the sponsor has not hired the right consultant. At this point, it is widely acknowledged that there is no point submitting a drug to the FDA if you have not hired the right former employees.

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2psW0NE via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2ptgMgn

Still Think the FDA Looks Out for Consumers?

While the national movement that swept Donald Trump into office leaned heavily on a “Drain the Swamp” slogan, FDA officials are filling the swamp with more murky water and many of them are leaving the agency en masse to work at a Big Pharma consulting/lobbying firm.

Greenleaf Health, which may not have been on your radar, is the beneficiary of this influx of agency personnel. It’s a DC-based consulting firm that helps the pharmaceutical industry get products through FDA approval and avoid enforcement actions.

Greenleaf boasts an impressive assembly of former FDA officials. This is especially true after a recent high-profile hire, Dr. John Jenkins, a twenty-five-year agency veteran and the former director of the Office of New Drugs, where he oversaw the review of thousands of new drug applications. Dr. Jenkins also reportedly played a major role in implementing the Prescription Drug User Fee Act—the legislation that allowed the FDA to collect fees from Big Pharma to fund the drug approval process.

This is a prime example of the revolving door between the FDA and Big Pharma. Not only does the drug industry fund the FDA through user fees—regulators are often sitting across the table from their future employers.

It’s no wonder that in our present crony capitalist medical system, drugs like Vioxx and Avandia, responsible for tens of thousands of deaths, make it through the agency! Or that legitimate drugs fail because the sponsor has not hired the right consultant. At this point, it is widely acknowledged that there is no point submitting a drug to the FDA if you have not hired the right former employees.



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2psW0NE via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2pahX0W

Friday, April 21, 2017

FDA Loosens Reins on 23andMe Gene Tests

After selling out to Big Pharma, 23andMe went from being a pariah with the FDA to being a darling.

Recently, the FDA approved 23andMe’s direct-to-consumer genetic tests for ten conditions, including Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s, and celiac disease. Consumers send 23andMe a saliva sample, and the company sends back genetic data analyzing the disease risk of the FDA-approved conditions.

Recall that, in 2013, 23andMe received warning letters from the FDA to stop its inexpensive (then $99 per test) “do-it-yourself” genetic testing service for health screening and ancestry purposes, because consumers could be “misled” and harm themselves by “self-treating.” It didn’t look like the company was going to survive.

But then it received a major injection of investment from ten major pharmaceutical and biotech companies. At the time, we reported that the idea was to use the tests to help drug companies test new drugs. The move would keep the FDA at bay, and possibly even make the FDA friendly—but it also ensured that future developments will be guided by the interests of the pharmaceutical industry, not the consumers who desperately need these tests. The FDA especially likes that 23and Me might help Big Pharma test its drugs after the repeated failure of expected blockbusters in clinical trials to treat Alzheimer’s.

There is also a risk of over-reliance on this kind of data. Good evidence suggests that diseases like Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s are caused by environmental factors—pesticides, heavy metals, and other contaminants we are exposed to in the modern world. Focusing on genetic predisposition may not only be inaccurate, but could also dissuade people from taking an active approach to disease treatment and prevention—eating a good diet, exercising, avoiding exposure to environmental contaminants, etc.

This isn’t to say that 23andMe genetic tests aren’t useful. Understanding our genes can help us determine whether we are among those whose bodies can’t detoxify itself from contaminants very well, for example. But consumers should be aware that their data, however masked, is now going to Big Pharma—and what they will do with your data is anyone’s guess.

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2od4LLw via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2p4U5hr

FDA Loosens Reins on 23andMe Gene Tests

After selling out to Big Pharma, 23andMe went from being a pariah with the FDA to being a darling.

Recently, the FDA approved 23andMe’s direct-to-consumer genetic tests for ten conditions, including Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s, and celiac disease. Consumers send 23andMe a saliva sample, and the company sends back genetic data analyzing the disease risk of the FDA-approved conditions.

Recall that, in 2013, 23andMe received warning letters from the FDA to stop its inexpensive (then $99 per test) “do-it-yourself” genetic testing service for health screening and ancestry purposes, because consumers could be “misled” and harm themselves by “self-treating.” It didn’t look like the company was going to survive.

But then it received a major injection of investment from ten major pharmaceutical and biotech companies. At the time, we reported that the idea was to use the tests to help drug companies test new drugs. The move would keep the FDA at bay, and possibly even make the FDA friendly—but it also ensured that future developments will be guided by the interests of the pharmaceutical industry, not the consumers who desperately need these tests. The FDA especially likes that 23and Me might help Big Pharma test its drugs after the repeated failure of expected blockbusters in clinical trials to treat Alzheimer’s.

There is also a risk of over-reliance on this kind of data. Good evidence suggests that diseases like Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s are caused by environmental factors—pesticides, heavy metals, and other contaminants we are exposed to in the modern world. Focusing on genetic predisposition may not only be inaccurate, but could also dissuade people from taking an active approach to disease treatment and prevention—eating a good diet, exercising, avoiding exposure to environmental contaminants, etc.

This isn’t to say that 23andMe genetic tests aren’t useful. Understanding our genes can help us determine whether we are among those whose bodies can’t detoxify itself from contaminants very well, for example. But consumers should be aware that their data, however masked, is now going to Big Pharma—and what they will do with your data is anyone’s guess.



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2od4LLw via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2pNwSRn

A Real Solution to Feeding the World: Family Farms

Industry says we need conventional/GMO farming to feed the world. Here’s why they’re wrong.

David Montgomery, PhD, professor of Earth and Space Sciences at the University of Washington, recently pointed out that regenerative farming practices that restore fertility to soil will be the key to the future of agriculture.

Consider these facts:

  • Family farms produce three-quarters of the world’s food;
  • Three-quarters of the world’s farms are smaller than one hectare (about the size of a city block);
  • Small, diversified farms produce more than twice as much food per acre than industrialized farms. This is partly because smaller farms use less pesticides, fertilizers, and antibiotics per unit of production than industrialized farms.
  • A 2015 meta-analysis found that industrialized farm yields were only about 10% higher than organic farm yields. This yield gap is much smaller than the amount of food that is wasted every year, which is as high as 40%.

The findings of the US National Research Council add further weight to Prof. Montgomery’s conclusions. Even if conventional farming currently helps feed the developed world, there are external costs to industrialized farming practices that cannot be ignored. Discussing a 2010 report on the future of US agriculture, the researchers said,

Many modern agricultural practices have unintended negative consequences, such as destruction of soils, erosion, and decreased water and air quality, and farmers have to consider these consequences while trying to increase production. If farmers are going to meet future demands, the US agriculture system has to evolve to become sustainable and think broadly—past the bottom line of producing the most possible.

This doesn’t take into account the impact on human health of industrialized farming, including the harmful effects of synthetic herbicides and pesticides and widespread vitamin and mineral deficiency, since the soil, and therefore our food, is depleted of nutrients as a result of monocropping.

Read Dr. Montgomery’s article here.

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2ouuCux via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2pNqGch

A Real Solution to Feeding the World: Family Farms

Industry says we need conventional/GMO farming to feed the world. Here’s why they’re wrong.

David Montgomery, PhD, professor of Earth and Space Sciences at the University of Washington, recently pointed out that regenerative farming practices that restore fertility to soil will be the key to the future of agriculture.

Consider these facts:

  • Family farms produce three-quarters of the world’s food;
  • Three-quarters of the world’s farms are smaller than one hectare (about the size of a city block);
  • Small, diversified farms produce more than twice as much food per acre than industrialized farms. This is partly because smaller farms use less pesticides, fertilizers, and antibiotics per unit of production than industrialized farms.
  • A 2015 meta-analysis found that industrialized farm yields were only about 10% higher than organic farm yields. This yield gap is much smaller than the amount of food that is wasted every year, which is as high as 40%.

The findings of the US National Research Council add further weight to Prof. Montgomery’s conclusions. Even if conventional farming currently helps feed the developed world, there are external costs to industrialized farming practices that cannot be ignored. Discussing a 2010 report on the future of US agriculture, the researchers said,

Many modern agricultural practices have unintended negative consequences, such as destruction of soils, erosion, and decreased water and air quality, and farmers have to consider these consequences while trying to increase production. If farmers are going to meet future demands, the US agriculture system has to evolve to become sustainable and think broadly—past the bottom line of producing the most possible.

This doesn’t take into account the impact on human health of industrialized farming, including the harmful effects of synthetic herbicides and pesticides and widespread vitamin and mineral deficiency, since the soil, and therefore our food, is depleted of nutrients as a result of monocropping.

Read Dr. Montgomery’s article here.



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2ouuCux via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2ocHhGA

Thursday, April 20, 2017

Doctors Disagree…88% of the Time

Get a second opinion, and you’ll get confused. That could be the new motto for a healthcare industry characterized by dueling diagnoses.

According to a new study by the Mayo Clinic, nine out of ten people who seek a second opinion after receiving an initial diagnosis from a doctor get either a somewhat different or a completely new diagnosis from the second doctor. Only in 12% of cases did the second doctor simply confirm the initial diagnosis.

And this is only diagnosis. When it comes to treatment, the disagreement gets even sharper. So much for “settled science” and “ evidence-based medicine”!

Discrepancy of treatment was underscored in an earlier report we covered from ProPublica, which followed a man who was experiencing chest pain. Doctors and cardiologists were recommending an angiogram, a surgical procedure that installs a stent in the artery. Only after speaking to a third doctor did the man learn that his condition could be managed by short-term medication and lifestyle changes.

The larger point of that report was that medical procedures and medications are often used by the conventional medical community long after their appropriateness has been contradicted by research. In other words, millions of patients are receiving treatments that scientists have determined are ineffective, dangerous, or both.

Little surprise, then, that conventional medicine kills an estimated 783,936 people a year. We believe that figure to be greatly understated, because it mostly derives from hospital data—many, many more are sickened. It is likely that healthcare is the leading cause of death in the US, ahead of heart disease and cancer, as asserted by Gary Null’s book Death by Medicine.

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2pWgvyz via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2pHjpKU

Doctors Disagree…88% of the Time

Get a second opinion, and you’ll get confused. That could be the new motto for a healthcare industry characterized by dueling diagnoses.

According to a new study by the Mayo Clinic, nine out of ten people who seek a second opinion after receiving an initial diagnosis from a doctor get either a somewhat different or a completely new diagnosis from the second doctor. Only in 12% of cases did the second doctor simply confirm the initial diagnosis.

And this is only diagnosis. When it comes to treatment, the disagreement gets even sharper. So much for “settled science” and “ evidence-based medicine”!

Discrepancy of treatment was underscored in an earlier report we covered from ProPublica, which followed a man who was experiencing chest pain. Doctors and cardiologists were recommending an angiogram, a surgical procedure that installs a stent in the artery. Only after speaking to a third doctor did the man learn that his condition could be managed by short-term medication and lifestyle changes.

The larger point of that report was that medical procedures and medications are often used by the conventional medical community long after their appropriateness has been contradicted by research. In other words, millions of patients are receiving treatments that scientists have determined are ineffective, dangerous, or both.

Little surprise, then, that conventional medicine kills an estimated 783,936 people a year. We believe that figure to be greatly understated, because it mostly derives from hospital data—many, many more are sickened. It is likely that healthcare is the leading cause of death in the US, ahead of heart disease and cancer, as asserted by Gary Null’s book Death by Medicine.



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2pWgvyz via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2oUse1n

Tuesday, April 18, 2017

Zen Honeycutt

Zen Honeycutt, executive director of Moms Across America, gives an overview of the vast damage being caused by glyphosate on human health and the environment. She details the importance of going organic and provides ways to get involved in the fight against this dangerous chemical.

FULL INTERVIEW:

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2pOjN6J via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2pdxtfm

Zen Honeycutt

Zen Honeycutt, executive director of Moms Across America, gives an overview of the vast damage being caused by glyphosate on human health and the environment. She details the importance of going organic and provides ways to get involved in the fight against this dangerous chemical.

FULL INTERVIEW:



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2pOjN6J via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2oINBT1

Repeal/Replace O-Care?

Or just legalize an alternative?

Following a politically disastrous failure to repeal and replace Obamacare earlier this year, reports suggest that House Republicans are “close” to a plan that might pass. We’ll report on this as soon as details become available.

One thing, however, remains abundantly clear: consumer control must be central to any healthcare solution.

From the beginning, ANH-USA opposed Obamacare because it reduced freedom of consumer choice in healthcare. Although we succeeded in getting some useful changes in the bill, we pointed out that the law allows the federal government to define what health is and what health insurance is. This, coupled with the mandated purchase of government-approved insurance—lest one be slapped with fines and even jail—means the government was unwittingly opening the way for special interests such as drug companies, medical device manufacturers, and the American Medical Association to complete their takeover of medicine. We said the resulting government-supported monopolies would also keep driving prices into the stratosphere, and wreck our economy as well as our health. These warnings have proved correct.

At ANH-USA, we have always stood for the freedom of consumers to choose the type of healthcare they want, and the freedom of practitioners to practice without harassment. This is the only way to break the monopolies that are strangling medicine—as well as our economy.

How can these goals be achieved, given current political realities? One elegantly simple solution is to NOT repeal Obamacare, but rather to pass legislation that legalizes the sale of health insurance that consumers prefer.

As it stands now, competition in healthcare is stifled by government regulations. For instance, it is illegal in most cases to sell health insurance in the US that doesn’t cover a wide array of conditions and treatments—including drug rehab and pregnancy services—which many of us will never use. Moreover, you still might not be able to see the doctor you want or go to the hospital you want. Then, despite the fact that your premium is sky-high, you still end up paying out-of-pocket for most of your care.

There is, of course, an irony in this. Obamacare was originally intended to eliminate deductibles and co-pays, but instead drove them through the roof. In addition, Americans seeking the services of integrative physicians—who are almost never covered by insurance—are required to pay twice: they are forced to buy government health insurance they won’t use, and then pay a second time for the healthcare they actually want.

To achieve meaningful reform and lower prices, lawmakers need to repeal the laws that create medical monopolies. For example:

  • Qualified professionals, including nurses, should be able to deliver appropriate medical services.
  • Any medically appropriate treatment should be allowed to compete as a medical treatment—not just those approved by the FDA at a cost of billions, which eliminates anything not patentable. This will greatly increase supply, a precondition for bringing prices down.
  • Lawmakers also must restore power to the consumer by allowing insurance companies to compete with one another, to offer the best plans at the lowest prices.

This means offering everything from catastrophic-only plans, which are especially suitable for those who want integrative medicine, to bare-bones plans with high deductibles—to premium plans that cover everything, including integrative medicine. Consumers should be able to pick from among plans that cover the things they need—not simply among plans that the government deems acceptable but which are really controlled by companies seeking government-controlled monopolies.

Obamacare does not necessarily need to be repealed completely for such competition to take place. Repeal could focus on allowing other approaches as well. The two laws could then run simultaneously, and Americans could choose which system they would like to take part in.

ANH-USA board member Dr. Ronald Hoffman offers more good ideas for how we can go about fixing American healthcare (the following points are taken directly from Dr. Hoffman’s excellent piece on this subject):

  • Foster a return to paying doctors directly, which eliminates pricey insurance and government bureaucrats as arbiters of “correct” medical care.
  • HSAs (tax-incentivized Health Savings Accounts) should be encouraged, and they should be expanded to cover supplements, gym memberships, yoga, and treatment by alternative practitioners.
  • Put an end to state medical boards’ prosecution of doctors merely for providing integrative services.
  • Create an entirely new medical speciality called “iatrinology.” Iatrogenic means medicine-caused harm—by various estimates, injury due to (even correctly-applied) medicines and surgery is among the major causes of death, injury, and disability in the US. Medical overkill is tanking our healthcare economy and undermining the well-being of Americans, so doctors need to cultivate the skill of identifying side effects, and how to wean patients off complex drug regimens. In part, this can be accomplished by the skillful deployment of diet, lifestyle, and scientifically validated
  • Allow for truthful claims about the efficacy of supplements to be communicated to the US public. Under the current system—an extraordinary abridgment of free speech rights—supplement companies are enjoined from claiming that their products do anything to prevent or ameliorate disease, even when conclusive scientific evidence exists to back their claims! Recently, even walnuts, cherries, and pomegranate juice were threatened with ruinous government lawsuits for publicizing their true health benefits. How can Americans make informed health choices when purveyors of low-cost natural solutions are muzzled?

We’re at a tipping point on this issue. We hope Congress can enact some commonsense reforms to our healthcare system that offers affordable care and freedom of choice to all Americans.

Other articles in this week’s Pulse of Natural Health:

Scott Gottlieb Appointed by Trump Administration to Head FDA

“Pesticides OK, Despite Risks,” Says EPA

Momentum: Natural Solutions Increasingly Seen as Solution to Opioid Crisis

Pregnant? Avoid Glyphosate

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2pxj2jj via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2pdhHRW

Pregnant? Avoid Glyphosate

New research shows a strong link between glyphosate levels in bodily fluids of expectant mothers and unfavorable birth outcomes, including shorter pregnancies.

Babies born from mothers with glyphosate in their system tended to weigh less. It’s also linked to many chronic health issues like diabetes, heart disease, high blood pressure, and obesity.

Glyphosate exposure occurs through food and by living near farming operations that spray their crops with this chemical.

The evidence showing the negative effects of glyphosate is mounting, as we’ve reported previously (here and here, for starters), but a recent court case has revealed that the government, rather than protecting consumers, is fighting diligently for Monsanto.

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2oRDai3 via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2pdhoX2

Repeal/Replace O-Care?

Or just legalize an alternative?

Following a politically disastrous failure to repeal and replace Obamacare earlier this year, reports suggest that House Republicans are “close” to a plan that might pass. We’ll report on this as soon as details become available.

One thing, however, remains abundantly clear: consumer control must be central to any healthcare solution.

From the beginning, ANH-USA opposed Obamacare because it reduced freedom of consumer choice in healthcare. Although we succeeded in getting some useful changes in the bill, we pointed out that the law allows the federal government to define what health is and what health insurance is. This, coupled with the mandated purchase of government-approved insurance—lest one be slapped with fines and even jail—means the government was unwittingly opening the way for special interests such as drug companies, medical device manufacturers, and the American Medical Association to complete their takeover of medicine. We said the resulting government-supported monopolies would also keep driving prices into the stratosphere, and wreck our economy as well as our health. These warnings have proved correct.

At ANH-USA, we have always stood for the freedom of consumers to choose the type of healthcare they want, and the freedom of practitioners to practice without harassment. This is the only way to break the monopolies that are strangling medicine—as well as our economy.

How can these goals be achieved, given current political realities? One elegantly simple solution is to NOT repeal Obamacare, but rather to pass legislation that legalizes the sale of health insurance that consumers prefer.

As it stands now, competition in healthcare is stifled by government regulations. For instance, it is illegal in most cases to sell health insurance in the US that doesn’t cover a wide array of conditions and treatments—including drug rehab and pregnancy services—which many of us will never use. Moreover, you still might not be able to see the doctor you want or go to the hospital you want. Then, despite the fact that your premium is sky-high, you still end up paying out-of-pocket for most of your care.

There is, of course, an irony in this. Obamacare was originally intended to eliminate deductibles and co-pays, but instead drove them through the roof. In addition, Americans seeking the services of integrative physicians—who are almost never covered by insurance—are required to pay twice: they are forced to buy government health insurance they won’t use, and then pay a second time for the healthcare they actually want.

To achieve meaningful reform and lower prices, lawmakers need to repeal the laws that create medical monopolies. For example:

  • Qualified professionals, including nurses, should be able to deliver appropriate medical services.
  • Any medically appropriate treatment should be allowed to compete as a medical treatment—not just those approved by the FDA at a cost of billions, which eliminates anything not patentable. This will greatly increase supply, a precondition for bringing prices down.
  • Lawmakers also must restore power to the consumer by allowing insurance companies to compete with one another, to offer the best plans at the lowest prices.

This means offering everything from catastrophic-only plans, which are especially suitable for those who want integrative medicine, to bare-bones plans with high deductibles—to premium plans that cover everything, including integrative medicine. Consumers should be able to pick from among plans that cover the things they need—not simply among plans that the government deems acceptable but which are really controlled by companies seeking government-controlled monopolies.

Obamacare does not necessarily need to be repealed completely for such competition to take place. Repeal could focus on allowing other approaches as well. The two laws could then run simultaneously, and Americans could choose which system they would like to take part in.

ANH-USA board member Dr. Ronald Hoffman offers more good ideas for how we can go about fixing American healthcare (the following points are taken directly from Dr. Hoffman’s excellent piece on this subject):

  • Foster a return to paying doctors directly, which eliminates pricey insurance and government bureaucrats as arbiters of “correct” medical care.
  • HSAs (tax-incentivized Health Savings Accounts) should be encouraged, and they should be expanded to cover supplements, gym memberships, yoga, and treatment by alternative practitioners.
  • Put an end to state medical boards’ prosecution of doctors merely for providing integrative services.
  • Create an entirely new medical speciality called “iatrinology.” Iatrogenic means medicine-caused harm—by various estimates, injury due to (even correctly-applied) medicines and surgery is among the major causes of death, injury, and disability in the US. Medical overkill is tanking our healthcare economy and undermining the well-being of Americans, so doctors need to cultivate the skill of identifying side effects, and how to wean patients off complex drug regimens. In part, this can be accomplished by the skillful deployment of diet, lifestyle, and scientifically validated
  • Allow for truthful claims about the efficacy of supplements to be communicated to the US public. Under the current system—an extraordinary abridgment of free speech rights—supplement companies are enjoined from claiming that their products do anything to prevent or ameliorate disease, even when conclusive scientific evidence exists to back their claims! Recently, even walnuts, cherries, and pomegranate juice were threatened with ruinous government lawsuits for publicizing their true health benefits. How can Americans make informed health choices when purveyors of low-cost natural solutions are muzzled?

We’re at a tipping point on this issue. We hope Congress can enact some commonsense reforms to our healthcare system that offers affordable care and freedom of choice to all Americans.

Other articles in this week’s Pulse of Natural Health:

Scott Gottlieb Appointed by Trump Administration to Head FDA

“Pesticides OK, Despite Risks,” Says EPA

Momentum: Natural Solutions Increasingly Seen as Solution to Opioid Crisis

Pregnant? Avoid Glyphosate



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2pxj2jj via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2nYQuSs

Pregnant? Avoid Glyphosate

New research shows a strong link between glyphosate levels in bodily fluids of expectant mothers and unfavorable birth outcomes, including shorter pregnancies.

Babies born from mothers with glyphosate in their system tended to weigh less. It’s also linked to many chronic health issues like diabetes, heart disease, high blood pressure, and obesity.

Glyphosate exposure occurs through food and by living near farming operations that spray their crops with this chemical.

The evidence showing the negative effects of glyphosate is mounting, as we’ve reported previously (here and here, for starters), but a recent court case has revealed that the government, rather than protecting consumers, is fighting diligently for Monsanto.



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2oRDai3 via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2pveYD4

Friday, April 14, 2017

Momentum: Natural Solutions Increasingly Seen as Solution to Opioid Crisis

The opioid epidemic is wreaking havoc—destroying lives and families—and the only true solution is through natural alternatives.

Increasingly, people are waking up to this fact.

More than 30,000 Americans each year die of opioid overdoses, half of which involve a prescription painkiller, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

The crisis of opioid addiction has led naturopaths and chiropractors to seek an expanded role in the treatment of pain. Groups representing these practitioners are in the process of lobbying the White House and Congress to push the Veterans Affairs health system to hire alternative providers.

Natural medicine can indeed help with pain. CBD oil is one alternative, but as we reported recently, the feds are moving against it. You can reference our review article here on some other natural treatments for pain.

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2piBhcd via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2oHzCio

Momentum: Natural Solutions Increasingly Seen as Solution to Opioid Crisis

The opioid epidemic is wreaking havoc—destroying lives and families—and the only true solution is through natural alternatives.

Increasingly, people are waking up to this fact.

More than 30,000 Americans each year die of opioid overdoses, half of which involve a prescription painkiller, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

The crisis of opioid addiction has led naturopaths and chiropractors to seek an expanded role in the treatment of pain. Groups representing these practitioners are in the process of lobbying the White House and Congress to push the Veterans Affairs health system to hire alternative providers.

Natural medicine can indeed help with pain. CBD oil is one alternative, but as we reported recently, the feds are moving against it. You can reference our review article here on some other natural treatments for pain.



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2piBhcd via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2oHDrEo

Thursday, April 13, 2017

“Pesticides OK, Despite Risks,” Says EPA

Apparently, diminished brain function and reduction of children’s IQs is insufficient cause for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to overturn the approval of a chemical manufactured by one of the largest producers on the planet.

The EPA recently rejected a petition to ban the use of insecticides known as chlorpyrifos on food crops—despite the agency’s own evidence showing the harm they can cause.

These chemicals are used on citrus trees, strawberries, broccoli, and cauliflower. The EPA previously banned the spraying of chlorpyrifos indoors to get rid of household bugs.

EPA officials are, in fact, aware of evidence that found exposure to chlorpyrifos caused measurable differences in children’s brain function, on average dropping their IQs a few points. Some research has linked the pesticides to autism and other brain disorders. There’s also evidence to suggest that some children are more vulnerable to the chemicals than others due to their genetic makeup.

The problem? Chlorpyrifos are products of Dow Agrosciences, one of the largest chemical manufacturers on the planet. But this has nothing to do with the EPA’s decision to keep these chemicals on the market, right?

Read the full story here.

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2pdv8Os via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2pbrGGJ

“Pesticides OK, Despite Risks,” Says EPA

Apparently, diminished brain function and reduction of children’s IQs is insufficient cause for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to overturn the approval of a chemical manufactured by one of the largest producers on the planet.

The EPA recently rejected a petition to ban the use of insecticides known as chlorpyrifos on food crops—despite the agency’s own evidence showing the harm they can cause.

These chemicals are used on citrus trees, strawberries, broccoli, and cauliflower. The EPA previously banned the spraying of chlorpyrifos indoors to get rid of household bugs.

EPA officials are, in fact, aware of evidence that found exposure to chlorpyrifos caused measurable differences in children’s brain function, on average dropping their IQs a few points. Some research has linked the pesticides to autism and other brain disorders. There’s also evidence to suggest that some children are more vulnerable to the chemicals than others due to their genetic makeup.

The problem? Chlorpyrifos are products of Dow Agrosciences, one of the largest chemical manufacturers on the planet. But this has nothing to do with the EPA’s decision to keep these chemicals on the market, right?

Read the full story here.



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2pdv8Os via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2pb9ZY7

Wednesday, April 12, 2017

Scott Gottlieb Appointed by Trump Administration to Head FDA

President Trump’s pick for FDA commissioner, Dr. Scott Gottlieb, faced Congress recently. As you know, this nomination could prove pivotal for the future of natural health. It is important for our readers to be aware of his background.

Dr. Gottlieb is currently a practicing physician at Stamford Hospital in Connecticut, and a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute—a nonprofit, nonpartisan institution dedicated to research and education on issues ranging from government and economics to social welfare. Ideologically, the AEI would describe itself as “conservative” and “supportive of free markets.”

Dr. Gottlieb is a veteran of the FDA. From 2003–2004, he was a senior advisor to FDA Commissioner Mark McClellan and the FDA’s director of medical policy development. He then worked as a senior advisor to the administrator of Medicare and Medicaid Services. Between 2005 and 2007, Dr. Gottlieb served as FDA deputy commissioner. This was a George W. Bush appointment.

His résumé also includes editorial positions on the British Medical Journal and the Journal of the American Medical Association.

In terms of his positions on healthcare policy, we know that Dr. Gottlieb has written that the FDA, in prioritizing consumer safety, has “neglected its other key obligation, which is to guide new medical innovations to market.” This of course echoes President Trump’s own sentiment that the FDA is standing in the way of new drugs from coming on the market.

Dr. Gottlieb, like most other past FDA commissioners, has ties to the pharmaceutical industry. He serves or was recently serving on the boards of major drug makers, including GlaxoSmithKline. In his financial disclosure letter to Health and Human Services, Dr. Gottlieb disclosed financial relationships with over twenty-five entities, which included some of the largest biotech and pharmaceutical companies in the world. To alleviate justified concerns, he told Congress last week that he would recuse himself—but only for one year—from agency decisions involving companies he has worked with or invested in.

On another front, when asked by the Senate HELP (Health, Education, Labor, and Pension) Committee about President Trump’s remarks regarding the possible link between vaccines and autism, Dr. Gottlieb said that this was “one of the most exhaustively studied questions in scientific history,” and said the studies show “there is no causal link between vaccination and autism.”

It’s unclear where exactly Dr. Gottlieb stands on other issues important to natural health advocates. We’ll be watching his confirmation very closely and will keep you abreast of any important developments.

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2p6wg9c via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2opdp6N

Scott Gottlieb Appointed by Trump Administration to Head FDA

President Trump’s pick for FDA commissioner, Dr. Scott Gottlieb, faced Congress recently. As you know, this nomination could prove pivotal for the future of natural health. It is important for our readers to be aware of his background.

Dr. Gottlieb is currently a practicing physician at Stamford Hospital in Connecticut, and a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute—a nonprofit, nonpartisan institution dedicated to research and education on issues ranging from government and economics to social welfare. Ideologically, the AEI would describe itself as “conservative” and “supportive of free markets.”

Dr. Gottlieb is a veteran of the FDA. From 2003–2004, he was a senior advisor to FDA Commissioner Mark McClellan and the FDA’s director of medical policy development. He then worked as a senior advisor to the administrator of Medicare and Medicaid Services. Between 2005 and 2007, Dr. Gottlieb served as FDA deputy commissioner. This was a George W. Bush appointment.

His résumé also includes editorial positions on the British Medical Journal and the Journal of the American Medical Association.

In terms of his positions on healthcare policy, we know that Dr. Gottlieb has written that the FDA, in prioritizing consumer safety, has “neglected its other key obligation, which is to guide new medical innovations to market.” This of course echoes President Trump’s own sentiment that the FDA is standing in the way of new drugs from coming on the market.

Dr. Gottlieb, like most other past FDA commissioners, has ties to the pharmaceutical industry. He serves or was recently serving on the boards of major drug makers, including GlaxoSmithKline. In his financial disclosure letter to Health and Human Services, Dr. Gottlieb disclosed financial relationships with over twenty-five entities, which included some of the largest biotech and pharmaceutical companies in the world. To alleviate justified concerns, he told Congress last week that he would recuse himself—but only for one year—from agency decisions involving companies he has worked with or invested in.

On another front, when asked by the Senate HELP (Health, Education, Labor, and Pension) Committee about President Trump’s remarks regarding the possible link between vaccines and autism, Dr. Gottlieb said that this was “one of the most exhaustively studied questions in scientific history,” and said the studies show “there is no causal link between vaccination and autism.”

It’s unclear where exactly Dr. Gottlieb stands on other issues important to natural health advocates. We’ll be watching his confirmation very closely and will keep you abreast of any important developments.



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2p6wg9c via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2o6boKE

Tuesday, April 11, 2017

Chris Exley, PhD

This interview is taken from our upcoming documentary on the HPV vaccine (coming this summer).

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2ovGrDB via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2ppLJhk

Chris Exley, PhD

This interview is taken from our upcoming documentary on the HPV vaccine (coming this summer).



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2ovGrDB via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2ovNCvr

Employee Privacy at Risk

Want a job AND privacy? Congress is on the verge of making us choose one or the other, as it paves the way for employers to access both our private medical history and our genetic information. Action Alert!

Recently, a House committee approved a bill that would give employers more power to probe into their employees’ medical and genetic information. The bill increases the risk that employers could discriminate against employees based on their genetic makeup and their risk of disease.

HR 1313, the Preserving Employee Wellness Programs Act, undermines protections that consumers won under two earlier laws, the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Here’s how the new bill works: Obamacare incentivized the growth of workplace wellness programs, which typically involved the collection of certain medical data on employees who opt-in to the program. In exchange for their participation in these programs, employees received sizeable discounts on their insurance premiums—in some cases up to 50%.

This new bill significantly expands the information that employers can demand from their employees to take part in wellness programs and receive the insurance discounts.

For example:

  • Under the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA), employers can access only anonymous, aggregate data about their employees’ health. This new bill allows companies to ask for workers’ personal information—including the results of genetic tests.
  • GINA also stipulated that wellness programs could not ask about an employee’s family medical history. The new bill does away with that restriction for those who opt-in to workplace wellness programs.
  • The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) says employers can’t ask their employees to undergo a medical history or certain medical examinations unless that request is made through a voluntary wellness program. With the proliferation of workplace wellness programs following Obamacare, there was debate as to the legality of the collection of this data, but the new bill essentially bars legal challenges to this.

The new bill also does not explicitly rule out the application of these rules to employment candidates, nor does it provide protections for currently employed individuals who could see their careers stalled or terminated based on these results—or based on their refusal to provide their employers with the information.

Of additional concern, as our friends at the National Vaccine Information Center have pointed out, is that this bill could coerce employees in wellness programs to be vaccinated in order to receive the insurance discounts—or, ultimately, to keep their jobs.

A vaccination requirement could start with the flu shot, which contains unnecessary and dangerous ingredients such as aluminum and mercury as adjuvants. The flu vaccine is limited and unpredictable in its effectiveness, and the adjuvants may be linked to Alzheimer’s. Hospital workers are already required to get this vaccination. Before long, all employers could require it as a condition for cheaper insurance—or even for keeping your job. This is a slippery slope we don’t want to go down.

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA) was presented as something that would keep medical records private. It was a gross deception in that it allowed your records to be accessed by as many as 800,000 different parties. At least it did not include your employer among those with access! This new bill is yet another instance of government selling out private citizens to benefit large corporations. We must stop it in its tracks!

Action Alert! Write to your senators and representatives and tell them to oppose HR 1313. Please send your message immediately.

Other articles in this week’s Pulse of Natural Health:

EPA Ignores Fluoride Warnings

Animal Poop in Your Water?

An Aspirin a Day…Doubles Heart Attack Risk?

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2nZvczh via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2ovkBjt

Action Alert: Tell Congress to Protect Our Privacy!

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2nZutOS via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2ovi8FZ

Employee Privacy at Risk

Want a job AND privacy? Congress is on the verge of making us choose one or the other, as it paves the way for employers to access both our private medical history and our genetic information. Action Alert!

Recently, a House committee approved a bill that would give employers more power to probe into their employees’ medical and genetic information. The bill increases the risk that employers could discriminate against employees based on their genetic makeup and their risk of disease.

HR 1313, the Preserving Employee Wellness Programs Act, undermines protections that consumers won under two earlier laws, the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Here’s how the new bill works: Obamacare incentivized the growth of workplace wellness programs, which typically involved the collection of certain medical data on employees who opt-in to the program. In exchange for their participation in these programs, employees received sizeable discounts on their insurance premiums—in some cases up to 50%.

This new bill significantly expands the information that employers can demand from their employees to take part in wellness programs and receive the insurance discounts.

For example:

  • Under the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA), employers can access only anonymous, aggregate data about their employees’ health. This new bill allows companies to ask for workers’ personal information—including the results of genetic tests.
  • GINA also stipulated that wellness programs could not ask about an employee’s family medical history. The new bill does away with that restriction for those who opt-in to workplace wellness programs.
  • The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) says employers can’t ask their employees to undergo a medical history or certain medical examinations unless that request is made through a voluntary wellness program. With the proliferation of workplace wellness programs following Obamacare, there was debate as to the legality of the collection of this data, but the new bill essentially bars legal challenges to this.

The new bill also does not explicitly rule out the application of these rules to employment candidates, nor does it provide protections for currently employed individuals who could see their careers stalled or terminated based on these results—or based on their refusal to provide their employers with the information.

Of additional concern, as our friends at the National Vaccine Information Center have pointed out, is that this bill could coerce employees in wellness programs to be vaccinated in order to receive the insurance discounts—or, ultimately, to keep their jobs.

A vaccination requirement could start with the flu shot, which contains unnecessary and dangerous ingredients such as aluminum and mercury as adjuvants. The flu vaccine is limited and unpredictable in its effectiveness, and the adjuvants may be linked to Alzheimer’s. Hospital workers are already required to get this vaccination. Before long, all employers could require it as a condition for cheaper insurance—or even for keeping your job. This is a slippery slope we don’t want to go down.

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA) was presented as something that would keep medical records private. It was a gross deception in that it allowed your records to be accessed by as many as 800,000 different parties. At least it did not include your employer among those with access! This new bill is yet another instance of government selling out private citizens to benefit large corporations. We must stop it in its tracks!

Action Alert! Write to your senators and representatives and tell them to oppose HR 1313. Please send your message immediately.

Other articles in this week’s Pulse of Natural Health:

EPA Ignores Fluoride Warnings

Animal Poop in Your Water?

An Aspirin a Day…Doubles Heart Attack Risk?



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2nZvczh via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2p18Kuh

Action Alert: Tell Congress to Protect Our Privacy!



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2nZutOS via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2nZkCsf

Friday, April 7, 2017

EPA Ignores Fluoride Warnings

When presented with evidence that fluoride is linked to the development of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and lower IQs, the Environmental Protection Agency essentially said, “We don’t care.”

This occurred when the agency responded to a petition filed by the Organic Consumers Association (OCA), Food & Water Watch, and others, asking the agency to stop allowing the addition of fluoride into drinking water, citing scientific literature as part of their argument.

Despite pledging “careful deliberation,” the EPA rejected almost all of the evidence submitted in the petition, seemingly on arcane technical grounds.

If it were Monsanto asking, you can bet that top agency officials would do everything in their power to make the problem go away, as we saw in the recently unsealed documents in the glyphosate lawsuit.

Whom do government agencies really work for?

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2oaQz3Z via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2oNdMdE

EPA Ignores Fluoride Warnings

When presented with evidence that fluoride is linked to the development of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and lower IQs, the Environmental Protection Agency essentially said, “We don’t care.”

This occurred when the agency responded to a petition filed by the Organic Consumers Association (OCA), Food & Water Watch, and others, asking the agency to stop allowing the addition of fluoride into drinking water, citing scientific literature as part of their argument.

Despite pledging “careful deliberation,” the EPA rejected almost all of the evidence submitted in the petition, seemingly on arcane technical grounds.

If it were Monsanto asking, you can bet that top agency officials would do everything in their power to make the problem go away, as we saw in the recently unsealed documents in the glyphosate lawsuit.

Whom do government agencies really work for?



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2oaQz3Z via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/2oRlG34

Preventing and (Sometimes) Curing Cervical Cancer without Vaccinations

This content is for members only

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2o5pGwN via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2oJbrkr

The Other Side of the “Official” Vaccination Story

This content is for members only

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/2o5qmlZ via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/2oJasRi