Tuesday, February 9, 2016

Tide Turning against Ag-Gag Laws?

After last year’s landmark decision in Idaho, more ag-gag laws are being challenged in court. State-based Action Alert!

Last year, we reported that a federal district court found Idaho’s “ag-gag” law unconstitutional on First Amendment grounds.

Like similar ag-gag laws in seven other states, Idaho’s law made it a felony to document and expose illegal and cruel practices at concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) and other agricultural facilities without the owner’s permission.

Similar lawsuits are now underway in North Carolina, Wyoming, and Utah (the Utah lawsuit began in 2013).

The North Carolina challenge is particularly important given the breadth of that state’s law. It punishes whistleblowers not just at CAFOs, but in all workplaces. The North Carolina legislature, no doubt heavily influenced by the powerful hog farming industry, was able to overcome Gov. Pat McCrory’s veto to make the bill become law in June 2015. Last month, a coalition of animal protection, consumer rights, and food safety groups filed a federal lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the law, which went into effect on January 1, 2016.

Similar legal action was taken against two Wyoming bills passed in 2015 that criminalized the discovery of harmful practices and conditions on federal, state, and private property, and then communicating that evidence to federal or state authorities. You read that right: bringing evidence of criminal wrongdoing to even federal authorities is now against the law.

In Utah, the first state in which an ag-gag law was challenged, the legal challenge has dragged on since 2013. Recent developments suggest that a settlement is unlikely, and news reports suggest a trial could finally take place in late 2016.

We hope these actions will achieve similar results as in Idaho and embolden those in the remaining four states to challenge their ag-gag laws.

Let’s keep in mind why laws protecting the deplorable conditions on many agricultural facilities are dangerous as well as unconstitutional. CAFOs are responsible for foodborne illnesses like salmonella and listeria; are notorious for their overuse and misuse of antibiotics, exacerbating the “superbug” problem that is rendering many antibiotics all but useless; and ruin rural economies in a variety of ways. In addition, there is the incredibly inhumane treatment of the animals themselves.

As with the GMO issue, Americans have a right to know where their food comes from.

Action Alerts!

For Tennessee Residents! The Tennessee legislature is considering an ag-gag bill, HB 1838. Write to your legislators and urge them to oppose it. Please send your message immediately.

Take-Action

If you live in one of the seven states listed below that currently has an ag-gag law on the books, click the “Take Action” button to ask your representatives to repeal the law in order to avoid a costly lawsuit like the one in Idaho.

  • Iowa
  • North Carolina
  • North Dakota
  • Missouri
  • Montana
  • Utah
  • Wyoming

Take-Action

Other articles in this week’s Pulse of Natural Health:

Is Your State Being Targeted by a Medical Monopoly?

HSAs Should Cover Supplements!



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/1Q7wPrI via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/1TQIbQs

Action Alert: HSA’s Should Cover Supplements!

Related article: HSA’s Should Cover Supplements!

Trouble Taking Action? Click here.

.errordiv { padding:10px; margin:10px; border: 1px solid #555555;color: #000000;background-color: #f8f8f8; text-align:center; width:500px; }
var ai_iframe_width_iframe2835 = 0; var ai_iframe_height_iframe2835 = 0;var aiIsIe8=false;var aiReadyCallbacks = ( typeof aiReadyCallbacks != ‘undefined’ && aiReadyCallbacks instanceof Array ) ? aiReadyCallbacks : [];var onloadFirediframe2835 = false; function aiShowIframe() { jQuery(“#iframe2835”).css(“visibility”, “visible”);} function aiShowIframeId(id_iframe) { jQuery(id_iframe).css(“visibility”, “visible”);} function aiResizeIframeHeight(height) { aiResizeIframeHeight(height,iframe2835); } function aiResizeIframeHeightId(height,width,id) {aiResizeIframeHeightById(id,height);} http://ift.tt/20TElYGvar ifrm_iframe2835 = document.getElementById(“iframe2835”);
var hiddenTabsDoneiframe2835 = false;
function resizeCallbackiframe2835() {}

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/1SGnhV5 via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/20mMliM

Action Alert: HSA’s Should Cover Supplements!

Related article: HSA’s Should Cover Supplements!

Trouble Taking Action? Click here.



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/1SGnhV5 via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/1LeRkeE

Tuesday, February 2, 2016

Cola Better Than Water?

Read More.

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/1SCYa3B via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/1KV6Dci

Cola Better Than Water?

Read More.



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/1SCYa3B via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/1SD4Mit

War on Natural Medicine Continues

If a mainstay treatment of natural medicine doctors is shown to be safe and effective by government research, what do you do? Ban it! Action Alert!

Congress passed the Drug Quality and Security Act in response to bad medicine from a rogue compounded-drug company, which the FDA had known about and refused to shut down. The FDA, ever the opportunist, and always working for the interests of Big Pharma, followed by writing regulations that threaten patient access to everything from estriol to nutrient IVs. So far there has been a two-pronged attack: either ban the substance from being compounded, or make it so expensive that no one can use it. Prices of many compounded treatments have already doubled or tripled in some cases.

Individualized chelation medications are now on the chopping block as well.

Chelation is used by integrative physicians to remove heavy metals like lead, cadmium, and arsenic from the body. Doing so can clear up many, many health conditions and prevent worse ones from developing. The process involves injecting patients with organic chemicals—such as edetate disodium (EDTA), which is typically compounded—that bind and remove the heavy metals present in the bloodstream. In IV chelation, mineral and nutrient IVs are typically added to support the body during the detoxification process.

Think of your body as a bathtub, slowly being filled with environmental contaminants that we are constantly exposed to in the modern world—like the pesticides on your tomatoes, or the BPA in your plastic food wrap or your dentist’s seal or filling material. If your “bathtub drain” is clear, these toxins will exit the body naturally. If the drain is clogged—because of an ill-functioning system caused by genetic mutations, stress, the accumulation of many exposures, a poor diet, or other lifestyle factors—your “tub” will overflow, making every fresh chemical exposure a new assault. This is why chelation is so helpful for some—it returns the body to homeostasis by removing many of these harmful toxins.

Research has demonstrated that chelation is both safe and beneficial. The federally funded TACT (Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy) study, which included 1,708 patients across the US and Canada, showed that chelation reduced cardiovascular events in patients who were over 50 and had previously experienced a heart attack. The results of this randomized, double-blind study were even more profound for diabetic patients, who experienced a 43% reduction in death from cardiovascular events over five years.

Research based on the TACT trial also showed that concerns over the safety of EDTA were largely unwarranted. One study concluded: “The experience with 55,222 infusions of edetate disodium or placebo in TACT shows that this therapy is extremely safe when used according to the TACT safe infusion protocol.”

Surely this evidence would be enough to convince the skeptics that there is something to chelation, right? Wrong!

The medical establishment has been hostile to chelation and the doctors who perform it for decades. A few years ago we reported that doctors were not only advised to reject chelation therapy—they were asked to report on colleagues who practiced it. Continuing education conferences attended by doctors highlighted the dangers of chelation while dismissing the benefits.

The results of TACT shocked cardiologists and sent the medical mainstream into a frenzy of excuses. When the results were brought to the FDA as evidence of the viability of chelation in improving cardiovascular health, the agency asked for another study in order to approve it.

The Pharma-funded media went into attack mode. Forbes called the study “highly controversial” and said, “Most physicians and scientists have dismissed chelation therapy as lacking any evidence or rationale.” The Associated Press, in one of the most slanted, sneering, CAM-bashing pieces of “reporting” we’ve ever seen, called it “fringe medicine” despite the indisputably positive results of this government run-study.

We also know that state medical boards have a history of targeting doctors who use chelation. Three states—Oregon, Tennessee, and New Hampshire—allow chelation only for the treatment of heavy metal toxicity that is verified by a blood test. Never mind that the blood test for these metals is often unreliable.

Natural health advocates are all too familiar with this dynamic: doctors on the cutting edge of science and medicine are attacked and undermined, particularly by those who benefit from the status quo either monetarily or in career standing. If chelation is shown to improve cardiovascular health, the need for blood thinners and cholesterol-reducing pharmaceutical drugs (two of the primary methods conventional doctors use to manage cardiovascular health) is sharply reduced—more evidence that pharmaceutical interests are behind the assault on individualized medicine that would eliminate compounded EDTA, as well as the biased mainstream media coverage of the topic. Again never mind that both blood thinners and cholesterol reducing drugs are themselves dangerous and often harmful to the patient. Why worry about the patient when billions of revenue is at stake?

Efforts are currently underway to replicate the findings of the first TACT study in a second federally funded trial, “TACT 2.” If TACT 2 is positive, it will move chelation from the shadows into the light and introduce a completely new mechanism to improve cardiovascular health. TACT and TACT 2 have the potential to change cardiology by forcing the realization that environmental toxins have an effect on the heart and blood vessels and are therefore risk factors that should be taken into account when assessing patient health.

Chelation therapy has been used by many physicians and administered to thousands of patients since 1952. An informal survey of our readers revealed that body detoxification—whether through chelation, or through sauna or special dietary methods—is among their top ten most popular integrative therapies.

Unfortunately, the success of EDTA in reducing cardiovascular events could become a moot point if the FDA declares that it cannot be compounded, either making chelation almost completely unavailable or clearing the way for Big Pharma to patent an expensive chelation drug. The recent crisis in Flint, Michigan, where high levels of lead were found in the city’s water supply, underscores the desperate need for more tools to combat environmental toxins.

Action Alert! Send a message to the FDA urging them not to restrict consumer access to chelation with EDTA. Please send your message immediately.

Take-Action

Other articles in this week’s Pulse of Natural Health:

They Knew from the Beginning…

“Diet Coke Is Healthier than Water!”

 

from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/1PxbYvA via Aloe for Health




from http://ift.tt/1PSNChT

War on Natural Medicine Continues

If a mainstay treatment of natural medicine doctors is shown to be safe and effective by government research, what do you do? Ban it! Action Alert!

Congress passed the Drug Quality and Security Act in response to bad medicine from a rogue compounded-drug company, which the FDA had known about and refused to shut down. The FDA, ever the opportunist, and always working for the interests of Big Pharma, followed by writing regulations that threaten patient access to everything from estriol to nutrient IVs. So far there has been a two-pronged attack: either ban the substance from being compounded, or make it so expensive that no one can use it. Prices of many compounded treatments have already doubled or tripled in some cases.

Individualized chelation medications are now on the chopping block as well.

Chelation is used by integrative physicians to remove heavy metals like lead, cadmium, and arsenic from the body. Doing so can clear up many, many health conditions and prevent worse ones from developing. The process involves injecting patients with organic chemicals—such as edetate disodium (EDTA), which is typically compounded—that bind and remove the heavy metals present in the bloodstream. In IV chelation, mineral and nutrient IVs are typically added to support the body during the detoxification process.

Think of your body as a bathtub, slowly being filled with environmental contaminants that we are constantly exposed to in the modern world—like the pesticides on your tomatoes, or the BPA in your plastic food wrap or your dentist’s seal or filling material. If your “bathtub drain” is clear, these toxins will exit the body naturally. If the drain is clogged—because of an ill-functioning system caused by genetic mutations, stress, the accumulation of many exposures, a poor diet, or other lifestyle factors—your “tub” will overflow, making every fresh chemical exposure a new assault. This is why chelation is so helpful for some—it returns the body to homeostasis by removing many of these harmful toxins.

Research has demonstrated that chelation is both safe and beneficial. The federally funded TACT (Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy) study, which included 1,708 patients across the US and Canada, showed that chelation reduced cardiovascular events in patients who were over 50 and had previously experienced a heart attack. The results of this randomized, double-blind study were even more profound for diabetic patients, who experienced a 43% reduction in death from cardiovascular events over five years.

Research based on the TACT trial also showed that concerns over the safety of EDTA were largely unwarranted. One study concluded: “The experience with 55,222 infusions of edetate disodium or placebo in TACT shows that this therapy is extremely safe when used according to the TACT safe infusion protocol.”

Surely this evidence would be enough to convince the skeptics that there is something to chelation, right? Wrong!

The medical establishment has been hostile to chelation and the doctors who perform it for decades. A few years ago we reported that doctors were not only advised to reject chelation therapy—they were asked to report on colleagues who practiced it. Continuing education conferences attended by doctors highlighted the dangers of chelation while dismissing the benefits.

The results of TACT shocked cardiologists and sent the medical mainstream into a frenzy of excuses. When the results were brought to the FDA as evidence of the viability of chelation in improving cardiovascular health, the agency asked for another study in order to approve it.

The Pharma-funded media went into attack mode. Forbes called the study “highly controversial” and said, “Most physicians and scientists have dismissed chelation therapy as lacking any evidence or rationale.” The Associated Press, in one of the most slanted, sneering, CAM-bashing pieces of “reporting” we’ve ever seen, called it “fringe medicine” despite the indisputably positive results of this government run-study.

We also know that state medical boards have a history of targeting doctors who use chelation. Three states—Oregon, Tennessee, and New Hampshire—allow chelation only for the treatment of heavy metal toxicity that is verified by a blood test. Never mind that the blood test for these metals is often unreliable.

Natural health advocates are all too familiar with this dynamic: doctors on the cutting edge of science and medicine are attacked and undermined, particularly by those who benefit from the status quo either monetarily or in career standing. If chelation is shown to improve cardiovascular health, the need for blood thinners and cholesterol-reducing pharmaceutical drugs (two of the primary methods conventional doctors use to manage cardiovascular health) is sharply reduced—more evidence that pharmaceutical interests are behind the assault on individualized medicine that would eliminate compounded EDTA, as well as the biased mainstream media coverage of the topic. Again never mind that both blood thinners and cholesterol reducing drugs are themselves dangerous and often harmful to the patient. Why worry about the patient when billions of revenue is at stake?

Efforts are currently underway to replicate the findings of the first TACT study in a second federally funded trial, “TACT 2.” If TACT 2 is positive, it will move chelation from the shadows into the light and introduce a completely new mechanism to improve cardiovascular health. TACT and TACT 2 have the potential to change cardiology by forcing the realization that environmental toxins have an effect on the heart and blood vessels and are therefore risk factors that should be taken into account when assessing patient health.

Chelation therapy has been used by many physicians and administered to thousands of patients since 1952. An informal survey of our readers revealed that body detoxification—whether through chelation, or through sauna or special dietary methods—is among their top ten most popular integrative therapies.

Unfortunately, the success of EDTA in reducing cardiovascular events could become a moot point if the FDA declares that it cannot be compounded, either making chelation almost completely unavailable or clearing the way for Big Pharma to patent an expensive chelation drug. The recent crisis in Flint, Michigan, where high levels of lead were found in the city’s water supply, underscores the desperate need for more tools to combat environmental toxins.

Action Alert! Send a message to the FDA urging them not to restrict consumer access to chelation with EDTA. Please send your message immediately.

Take-Action

Other articles in this week’s Pulse of Natural Health:

They Knew from the Beginning…

“Diet Coke Is Healthier than Water!”

 



from The Alliance for Natural Health http://ift.tt/1PxbYvA via Aloe for Health
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/1P3LIrb